EDITORIAL: Spider-Man Casting. Could They Have Picked an Even Better One?

EDITORIAL: Spider-Man Casting. Could They Have Picked an Even Better One?

Did Mark Webb make a mistake by casting a 27 year old Spider-Man for the reboot? Could this 16 year old have been the perfect hidden gem for the role?

Back in July it was Annouced that Andrew Garfield was our new Spider-Man. Although many fans have now warmed up to the casting decision, it was initially met with mixed reactions. The main reason for some of the negative reactions was Garfield's age. This up and coming British actor is 27, hardly a high-school student like the character Peter Parker, a.k.a. Spider-Man, is suppose to be. Garfield has undoubtedly proven his acting abilities by his performances in The Social Network and The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. Still, fans were a little on the edge, due to his age, and were wondering whether or not he had all the right qualities for a good Spider-Man.

My question is: could the studio have picked a younger, even more unknown, actor with some qualities closer to the Peter Parker character? My opinion, if they looked a little closer, yes. Enter sixteen year old Callan McAuliffe.

Born January 24, 1995 in Sydney, Australia, Callan McAuliffe starred in the 2010 film Flipped, and more recently, in the 2011 film I Am Number Four. Despite it's dismal reception, I personally quite enjoyed I Am Number Four, and felt McAuliffe was definitely one of the highlights of the film.

McAuliffe's resemblance to Peter Parker is truly uncanny. Looking at his performance in Number 4, he has all the qualities for a young Parker. He has great comedic timing, and wonderful wit. And I feel he could pull off the more serious aspects of the character as well. I felt his time in the film was used well, but I still wanted to see more. He has a very Peter Parker feel to him, and we'd get to see plenty of that in a Spider-Man film with him in the lead. He seems like, for someone so young, he would be extremely dedicated to a part such as this, and would work toward the physical demands of the role as well. He would definitely take the role seriously, and would give us a Parker to be truly proud of.

Don't get me wrong, Andrew Garfield is a wonderful actor, and will do the character justice, but McAuliffe just has many more of the qualities that I feel perfect for the role. He is exactly what the character is to me, and he certainly would be convincing as a young, new-to-the-business Spider-Man. At sixteen, he is the appropriate age for a still in high-school Peter, something I feel is very important. He is young and able to mature with the character, as opposed to him outgrowing it.

But, the die has been cast, and Garfield is Peter Parker. But I will still always think about Callan McAuliffe, and how we could have had a perfect Spider-Man. But, I suppose a good Spider-Man will have to do.

Thanks for reading! Please, leave your thoughts below!

Posted By:
Member Since 4/5/2010
Filed Under "Fan Fic" 2/26/2011 Source: ComicBookMovie.com
DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]
Exiles - 2/26/2011, 3:55 AM
He's a good choice, he was good in I am Number Four, but garfields a class actor, the only thing the reboot MIGHT have done wrong was casting him as a teen peter parker, because the dude looks the older spidey the one in his early 20's. But I am not going to complain garfield is class actor, his performaces in social network does not compare to the one he gave in Boy A. One hell of a film and it all hangs on garfields shoulder.
RyanLantern77 - 2/26/2011, 5:38 AM
Garfield is a great actor, I am happy the way the movie seems to be going. I won't say they mad any mistakes until I see the movie
ager - 2/26/2011, 6:54 AM
that always bugs me when an adult plays a child. esp when it calls for sequels im 29 and can pass for very young as well but in 5 years, like Garfield, well have wrinkles and at 35 wont lokk like were 18 0r 19. by the third Spiderman everyone sain Toby looked way too old, i agree. see, even if the sequel comes out three years later you gotta figure in movie time it isnt supposed to be 3 years passed. Garfields a quality actor tho so who knows either way but i wouldve liked to see it happen
WeekendAvenger - 2/26/2011, 8:04 AM
honestly if peter parker came right off the page to play spider-man people would still want someone else

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.