COMICS: Colored Version Of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #700 Second Printing Cover

We saw a penciled version yesterday, now hit the jump to check out the colored version of Humberto Ramos' variant cover for the second printing of the controversial Amazing Spider-Man #700.

Follow Paul:
By Paul Romano - 12/28/2012
Yesterday, we saw a penciled version of Humberto Ramos' cover for the second printing of Dan Slott's very controversial Amazing Spider-Man #700, which sees Doctor Octopus taking Peter Parker's place as Spider-Man. The cover is a tribute to Todd McFarlane's cover for Amazing Spider-Man #300. Now, thanks to MTV Geek, we have the colored version of the variant for the final issue in the Marvel Comics series which began in 1963.



AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #700
Written By:
Dan Slott
Art By:
Humberto Ramos










Source: MTV Geek
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and "safe harbor" provisions. CBM will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. You may also learn more about our copyright and trademark policies HERE.
3
LIKE!
29 Comments
brf8879 - 12/28/2012, 6:30 AM
cover is stupid looks like kindergarten animation...oh and first
UltimaRex - 12/28/2012, 6:38 AM
Yeah sure, rub their noses in it.
mgeoff88 - 12/28/2012, 6:39 AM
OMG... just when I thought this couldn't look any worse, they color it smh.
1stgoat - 12/28/2012, 6:46 AM
If this is what Marvel is going to allow to happen to Spider Man, I hope they never get the movie rights back
ralfinader - 12/28/2012, 6:49 AM
1stgoat - 12/28/2012, 6:46 AM
Report Comment
If this is what Marvel is going to allow to happen to Spider Man, I hope they never get the movie rights back

Could not agree more. Very glad Alonso and his retarded crew aren't involved with the movies.
astromerc - 12/28/2012, 6:57 AM
JohnnyKrypton - 12/28/2012, 7:00 AM
For me that's the best Ock has looked since Slott started crapping all over him. I'll take what I can get
edmundo - 12/28/2012, 7:03 AM
Pass
ATrueHero1987 - 12/28/2012, 7:04 AM
@1stgoat I think that's one of the reason why they're doing that to Spider-Man
Dynamo - 12/28/2012, 7:05 AM
What an unceremonious end to a great line of comics and a great character...
SpiderBat209 - 12/28/2012, 7:09 AM
I would have embraced the idea of Peter being replaced by Miguel O'Hara (Spiderman 2099), but this sh*t? :(

Now I did read in a thread that someone speculates that Peter Parker's mind is STILL inside his own body, just that it has been overrun by Ock's memories and thus Pete's mind lies dormant, and in time MAY wake up!

If that's the case, then a psychitzo Spidey may be interesting to read about, but I'll wait and see...
Nivekian - 12/28/2012, 7:25 AM
Wow, great way to poke that sleeping bear with a stick, Marvel.
jimpinto24 - 12/28/2012, 7:27 AM
The artwork is decent. Could be a lot better.
KaneVonDoom - 12/28/2012, 7:32 AM
Where the hell are those arms coming from? Clockwise from the top:

1. Apparently from the back of his thigh under his chin. And at least twice as long as the others.

2. This one actually continues past his ankle to the other side and comes out of [frick]ing nowhere.

3. Ummm. I have no idea where the third is coming from... Middle Earth?

4. His Ass.

Liefeld would be proud.
lapress - 12/28/2012, 7:45 AM
Doctor Asstupus
mob7medina - 12/28/2012, 8:53 AM
Marvel has truly lost its way the last few years and this is the worst by far and now a lackluster cover variant,with wack art to rub in the wound,geez!l mean how can ol murderous doc ock be spidey?And wait didnt he date aunt may before?lol this is weird and disgusting Mj is going to be sleeping with an old pervert `:0|
Fray - 12/28/2012, 9:03 AM
I'm not worried about this "shocking plot twist". As soon as sales start to slip they'll bring Peter back somehow, just like every other Marvel character that they've "killed off". Ock will figure out some way to transfer Peter's memories into a clone or something. Who the hell knows. If this storyline lasts more than a year I'll be SHOCKED.
KaneVonDoom - 12/28/2012, 9:18 AM
@monkeyballs3 Yeah, just noticed that. I opened up the link at work and it took me a while to read it and comment.
DTor91 - 12/28/2012, 9:42 AM
@u84l582
Comments like this is how I know a lot of people talk out of their a** on this site, especially in terms of art. You clearly don't understand perspective. How is it terrible when there's nothing that would put Ock in perspective? And by saying that, you're also saying that about McFarlane's #300 cover. This is clearly paying homage. I get the majority is pissed about what's going on with Spider-Man, I am too, but there's a difference between art and what's going on in the story. This is Liefeld worthy? You guys are something else I swear.
DTor91 - 12/28/2012, 10:03 AM
@monkeyballs3
Awkward placement and bad art are two totally different things.

This is good art, but look at where Batman's head is. Awkward placement yes, but that doesn't make the art bad.
CaptainObvious - 12/28/2012, 10:28 AM
Here is how Ramos draws Mary Jane:
DTor91 - 12/28/2012, 10:39 AM
@monkeyballs3
Ok I can see where you come from with that. Thanks for that, although I'll have to respectfully disagree. See I always see people here calling artwork bad or whatever without even saying why they feel it's bad, and I get frustrated with that being an aspiring comic artist myself. I get from most people that they say just to say it. And I'm not saying I'll always require some explanation (I'm a nobody here I don't deserve special treatment or anything lol, I don't think I come across that way though), I would just like to see legitimate criticism instead of just 'it's bad" or "it sucks." So seriously, thank you. But yeah as for the JL #6, I get the message in it, but that's what is called a tangent. As one of my teachers say, "Avoid contact with the crotch area when drawing." Haha.

@CaptainObvious
Oh, I've heard about this Mary Jane, this is my first time seeing it. Yeah that's poorly drawn. Eyes aren't on the same level, her nose looks crooked, same with her mouth but I guess that can be argued. She doesn't look feminine at all in that first panel. Spidey looks cool though.
DTor91 - 12/28/2012, 10:53 AM
@monkeyballs3

Yeah I'm the same way. In terms of art in comics at the moment I think Greg Land on Iron Man is the worst offender.
fanboy03191 - 12/28/2012, 11:04 AM
... But... No, I just can't do this anymore.
Nilphoenix - 12/28/2012, 11:15 AM
Crappy looking cover for a horrible last issue. What sits wrong with me isn't Peter Parker dying. These days, that happens a lot in comics, and I'm pretty sure they'll bring him back. The thing that makes me livid is that they killed him in the last issue of ASM, a book that has been published for over 50 years. What dipstick editors at Marvel thought that the best way to end ASM's run would be with Peter Parker finally failing and losing?
#screwMarvelComics
Kyos - 12/28/2012, 1:01 PM
Simply ugly.
AmazingFantasy - 12/28/2012, 3:54 PM
Just...

Puss [frick]ing poor.

Marvel doesn't give a fck.

Slott and Ramos should be out on the street begging for spare change.

Disgrace.
AmazingFantasy - 12/28/2012, 3:55 PM
Where the [frick] are his arms coming out, is he wearing mouth mask or does Ramos not know how to draw a mouth?

I can do better than Ramos.
AUSSYACE - 12/28/2012, 10:21 PM

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.