Martha! - BATMAN v SUPERMAN Hot Toys Figure Faithfully Recreates Ben Affleck's Armored Batman
Related:

"Martha!" - BATMAN v SUPERMAN Hot Toys Figure Faithfully Recreates Ben Affleck's Armored Batman

JUSTICE LEAGUE Director Zack Snyder Reveals Why He Set Out To Avoid Pure Propaganda Of Superman And Batman
Recommended For You:

JUSTICE LEAGUE Director Zack Snyder Reveals Why He Set Out To Avoid "Pure Propaganda" Of Superman And Batman

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

DCMarvelFreshman
DCMarvelFreshman - 1/10/2014, 1:19 PM
I'm sorry you put so much effort into this, but the original article was deleted for a reason. However, because of the effort you put into this, I can change it to an editorial instead of deleting. Your call.
McNyagano
McNyagano - 1/10/2014, 1:26 PM
So this is why my original article was deleted?
Emblemmaniac
Emblemmaniac - 1/10/2014, 1:29 PM
It would be a bit suprising if he is working on Batman vs Superman, since we all know that he loves to work in the dark and this producer reveals a bit to much to what is known of Warners way to handle things.
DCMarvelFreshman
DCMarvelFreshman - 1/10/2014, 1:32 PM
@McNyagano what Nailbiter said.

Considering we've had to delete at least 7 articles about this, I'm willing to leave this one up, but make it an editorial.
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 1/10/2014, 2:01 PM
So once more this is not much of a story then? Just some insight into a Twitter user, with some wishful thinking?

GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 1/10/2014, 2:07 PM
People should stop believing what this dude says, he's worked *with* WB a few times, so what? If he were leaking legitimate information about the movie WB/DC would have his head.
McNyagano
McNyagano - 1/10/2014, 3:38 PM
@nailbiter111

I understand but didn't Josh Wilding make an article about Wonder Woman and Doomsday using this guy as a source?
staypuffed
staypuffed - 1/10/2014, 3:50 PM
McNyagano
Josh can do whatever the hell he wants. Whether that's a good or bad thing depends.
McNyagano
McNyagano - 1/10/2014, 3:53 PM
@staypuffed

I see. Hey I have no problem with my article taken down, I just found it a bit odd that's all.
Klone
Klone - 1/10/2014, 4:58 PM
Doomsday for JL origin? Okay. They can either play this card really, really safe or really, really stupid.
Klone
Klone - 1/10/2014, 4:59 PM
@Jollem

Lol, whatever. I forget you were the foreseer of the future and Fact Bringer of the Could've Been and Should've Been Realm Lord.
yonny616
yonny616 - 1/10/2014, 5:15 PM
@McN Because you have no power. They are romans, and we are their Gladiators. lol
staypuffed
staypuffed - 1/10/2014, 7:47 PM
McNyagano
I find it really irratating when Josh or other editors take articles down. Some of them are inappropriate, or have been reported before - or in the case of the leaked Amazing Spider-Man relaunch cover, companies have asked to take them down - which is valid, but sometimes they do it for no apparent reason and then don't explain anything.

I once posted an article featuring a new Alex Ross variant for a Fantastic Four issue and a few hours later my article was deleted. I gave a source, and it wasn't much of an article, just showing off the cover. No explanation was given as to why it was taken down. It's really frustrating.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 1/10/2014, 8:47 PM
@SotoJuiceMan I didn't see his tweets concerning Wonder Woman so I can't comment on that. But the tired and weary Batman thing has been pretty much a given since Comic-Con, so I don't think that really lends credibility to anything he says. I think people have the misconception that he's actually a producer on the movie, whereas he's really just a producer who's worked with WB a few times. He probably knows a few people in the business and is told things a few days before they're announced, simple as that.
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 1/10/2014, 9:04 PM
@Spidey5194 - that's right. Odds are, he could of just been stating the characters description of The Dark Knight Returns, since they used a quote from that graphic novel to announce Batman's involvement.

@staypuffed - I got my article recently deleted as well without reason, until I had to inquire as to why. It was a Stan Lee cameos list, but they deleted because I didn't embed the scenes, and they gave me that please read the guidelines to posting an article. However nowhere in that does it state, you must embed videos or it will be deleted. Rather there is much talk of copyright stuff that makes me slightly leery to even do that. Plus I didn't know how.
MightyZeus
MightyZeus - 1/11/2014, 9:23 AM
No i dont think it'll be titled Justice League. It's too soon. Wonder Woman is the only confirmed character to appear and she'll be a cameo. The Flash is rumored and Green Lantern is rumored. Not forgetting the banner is the Superman logo over the Batman logo.

I think the title should just be "Superman/Batman World's Finest".
NovaCorpsFan
NovaCorpsFan - 1/11/2014, 10:29 AM
We should all tweet stuff and see if the other comic book news sites grope at it as news.
GreenLantern519
GreenLantern519 - 1/11/2014, 12:30 PM
I just refuse to believe that Doomsday is going to be in this movie. It's way too early, and I doubt WB wants to blow their load this early on in the cinematic universe. That's like if they had Thanos appear in Iron Man 2...
BenjiWest
BenjiWest - 1/11/2014, 11:03 PM
Not really, doomsday is more of a superman villain than anything. They should go for it anyways, who knows how many opportunities they'll have.
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder