EDITORIAL: The Avengers Line Up!

I just wanted to put my 2 cents in on what I think of The Avengers Movie line up and get your opinions in the process.

Follow Hawksblueyes:
By Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010


For months now the speculation regarding the upcoming film The Avengers, has been cause for debate among over expectant comic fans everywhere. Who's going to make up the roster? Is it going to follow The Ultimates? Who will they face? Speculation about Edward Norton portraying Bruce Banner has fueled many an argument. The Pyms have fanned other hot debates. The studio can't make an Avengers movie without so and so. If they do have a part in the movie, what actor will they get for the character. And so on and so on and so on.

Everyone has known for sure that Captain America, Iron Man and Thor would be featured in the film, and that is where the opinions start to go in every direction imaginable. Some people want to see the original line up from 1963 and will accept nothing short of that. Other people want to see The Ultimates and can't envision anything else being adaptable to the big screen.

Now, before I go any further, let me tell you what I would have wanted. I am an Avenger nutcase. I have always loved comics but without a doubt I would trade any other comic or all other comics for The Avengers. Other people have their own favorite but The Avengers are mine, by far. It's not even close. I have been reading The Avengers since the late 70's so I'm pretty up on all things Avengers, discounting the crap they tried to pass off as good comics in the 90's. That stuff almost killed the title permanently.

Knowing that, you could probably guess that I would love to see the original line up. Well evidently, that's not going to happen. The line up that has been announced is Captain America, Iron Man, Thor, The Hulk, Hawkeye and The Black Widow (and no I don't count Nick Fury as an Avenger). Is it possible that there will be more characters introduced in the movie that have yet to be announced? Yes, it is completely possible but not likely and I'm OK with that. Here is why you should be also.

The Avengers as we all know, have been around for almost 50 years. After the first four or five years the line up began to look like a revolving door with the proverbial who's who of the Marvel Universe walking in and out every four or five issues. Marvel always used The Avengers to promote their up and coming or completely new characters that they really could not place in a self titled comic. The Fantastic Four had a closed roster, The X-Men was a private party (mutants only) and none of Marvels other group titles lasted long enough for them to promote anything new. So, outside of a stint on The Avengers a relatively unknown hero may have Marvel Two in One or Marvel team Up to look forward to but it was going to be a one shot deal.

During this in and out, merry go round roster ride there have been some constants from early on. Discounting the original five, I would consider Hawkeye, The Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, Hercules, The Black Panther, The Vision, The Beast, Wonderman, Mrs. Marvel and The Falcon to be these constants. The Black Widow could be placed in this group also. Even though she was not a member until much later, she was in and around the team much earlier than others in this group.

Other heroes came and went but if you place the original five on a list with these others you will find The Avengers line up has always consisted of at least two of these people and one of them is always the leader.

Out of this group Hawkeye and The Vision may as well be considered The Avengers staples for the simple reason that they have never had anywhere else to go. Sure they have worked with other heroes and teams but they absolutely don't fit in anywhere else. They are each in their own way a product of The Avengers in the same manner that Martian Manhunter is a product of The JLA.

Now in recent years, marvel has tried the reverse of it's previous promotional tactic to bring The Avenger titles back to where they belong as Marvels premier comic books. Instead of using the title to promote its individual characters, Marvel has used it's prominent heroes such as Spider Man, Luke Cage and Wolverine to boost Avengers sales, and it worked.

Which brings me back to the topic of who should be in the movie. I have already stated that I thought it should be the original team but thats not going to happen. For whatever reason, Marvel has decided to leave The Pyms out of the movie (as far as we know). Well if you are going to replace these two classic characters, it should be with two other classic characters, which takes us back to the second list.

The two that stand out as true blue, through and through Avengers on that list are Hawkeye and The Vision, for reasons that I already stated. Alright, so Hawkeye is a shoe in, what about The Vision? He can under no circumstances, be used for this movie. WHY, you ask? If Hank Pym has not been introduced you can't use the most famous creation of his most famous creation without severely angering the fan base. You have to go with your next logical choice.

The movie needs a woman in the fold to replace The Wasp and offset all the flying testosterone. The Scarlet Witch would be perfect. However, she won't work without her famous brother being close by and it's entirely possible that she is off limits because she is a mutant and Freakin Fox has the rights to Marvels mutants.

This leaves us with The Black Widow, who not only has been around the team almost since the beginning but has ties to almost every character in the Marvel Universe. She can be used fluidly in almost any film Marvel wants to shoot in the future. Like it or not, she is actually a better catalyst, or glue to hold Marvels plans together than The Wasp could have ever been.

To wrap up a long story, I am not at all dissatisfied with the line up Marvel has announced. I think it gives them a very solid platform to build any and all movies they have planned in their future.

As for the Pyms, I am sure they will show up in an Avengers movie soon enough. There are too many possibilities out there that are directly tied to them for Marvel to ignore them.

To all the other purists out there that are disappointed with this line up, I say sit back and give it a chance. It looks like it could be one Hell of a film.

As usual, let your opinion be heard below.
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
15
LIKE!
75 Comments
1 2
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 5:07 PM
;)
skullboy - 7/25/2010, 5:23 PM
We can do without Black Widow especially if she's played by Scarlett Johansson. I want Wasp and Hank Pym instead.
LEEE777 - 7/25/2010, 5:26 PM
skullboy @ HANK & JAN a must!!! : P

comicbookjerk - 7/25/2010, 5:26 PM
I want to See Jackson Say something Like " Im Tired of all These Mother F**** Snakes on this Mother F****** Hammer!"
skullboy - 7/25/2010, 5:29 PM
Exactly LEEE777. They were the founders of the group and I prefer they stick with how it really started rather that them giving it that Ultimates flavor to it since I never picked up any Ultimates comics. I just didn't see any point to it. I prefer they stick to the source rather than making it too flashy.
16ddh1 - 7/25/2010, 5:30 PM
weeres hulk
ElHefe1981 - 7/25/2010, 5:30 PM
I'm with hawks, i'm a purist and would love ALL cbms to be faithful to the comic they're based on, but fact of the matter is, it doesn't always transfer to the media of the silver screen well. I have the utmost faith in Mr. Whedon, he's done a lot of very good things, and until proven otherwise, i'll think he's the right man for this job.
grog - 7/25/2010, 5:30 PM
Well thought out and with factual reasons behind your oppinion. Well done. Oh by the way, I agree
JoshWilding - 7/25/2010, 5:32 PM
Brilliant editorial HAWKS! :) I'm now pretty sure that they're saving Hank and Jan for The Avengers 2 after they're introduced in the Ant-Man movie! I do hope that Whedon will use this oppurtnity to introduce a pile of new characters like Ms. Marvel and Wonder Man so they can be developed in future Marvel Studios movies and then become a part of the team later on!

I think that the team we have at the moment is good especially as The Avengers will surely focus on setting up the team. The big three alongside Hawkeye and Black Widow sounds pretty great IMO! However, I cant deny that I wish they'd used movies like Iron Man 2, Thor and Captain America to set up the Pym's so they could have eventually been a part of the team. Hulk vs. Giant Man would have been EPIC...
LEEE777 - 7/25/2010, 5:33 PM
SKULLBOY @ Me too dude!!!

Really don't care who plays them now, as long as their in it! H8 Ultimates lol!



[frick]ing BLACK WIDOW is not needed and HAWKEYE cameo only ready for AVENGERS 2!
Twenty23Three - 7/25/2010, 5:35 PM
I don't mind them mixing it up a bit for the cinematic universe. I mean could you imagine if they stuck to the origins of avengers rigidly? We wouldn't have captain america, well not the first film anyway
cashsteele - 7/25/2010, 5:41 PM
Ultimates version is written all over this from the moment they created Ultimate Nick Fury in the Samuel Jackson mold, people should've realized that this was the way it was heading, Ant-Man & Wasp (The Pyms) are from Ultimates though and it would've been great to have them in the movie even as scientist but they are getting solo Ant-Man movie... So while they aren't in Avenger eventually they may join later on and simply adding them to a line-up that is already packed with heroes that have already had solo movies would be a disservice to them as they would merely be in the background...
InTylerWeTrust - 7/25/2010, 5:51 PM
I was kind of pissed about the lack of Pym's, but I really don't mind anymore. I love the inclusion of Hawkeye and Renner playing him has pretty much made me forget about the Pym's.
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 5:52 PM
Thanks everyone. I not only see this line up as not being a let down but as pretty damn good. It sure could have ended up being alot worse considering how many characters have been Avengers through the years.
iSiT - 7/25/2010, 5:52 PM
I'm wondering where this fits in: http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l651o6jEow1qzniqdo1_500.jpg
Ranger14 - 7/25/2010, 6:00 PM
dannyrand@ My sentiments exactly.

Films are also made for the mainstream public and not just the minority of viewers who are CB fans. Mainstream public doesn't have a clue who Hand and Janet are. The film has enough to take care of in developing the chemistry between the established and lead characters. So many times we hear complaining here about CBM's taking on too many characters where they can't lend justice to the development of the characters, which weakens the overall story. I can see this happening if Hank and Janet are added in and play a key role. If there was a separate movie released first, it would be a different story. That's why I am okay if Hank and Jan are not in the first movie.
twiztied - 7/25/2010, 6:01 PM
Agreed Danny. To many characters means less screen time for others. They should use this as a spring board for other characters like antman or the black panther (he's one of my favorites) See if there liked enough on the screen to warrent there own movies. Now we all know Wheddon likes to kill of ppl like there's no tomm. so I'm expecting an opening or two for avengers 2 and who's to say Tonys going to stay he's a loner by nature with an already established movie series with more to go I'm sure.
Gab - 7/25/2010, 6:03 PM
First off this is The Ultimates version don't you see the ultimates Black Nick Fury? Don't you see Caps helmet with no wings on it and brown boots? I think it's a big mistake not to have Ant-Man and Wasp, Marvel owes alot of this new success to the Ultimate Avengers cartoon movie and Comic Book! They should have some respect and use those characters!
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 6:09 PM
Gab: You don't suppose that The Ultimates owe any respect to the 40 years of groundwork the original laid for the title to be able to handle exploring a completely seperate Universe do you?

Like it or not this is a mixture of the two universes. There is not one thing owed to The Ultimates that is not already visible in this movie.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 6:10 PM
@Gab I agree, they do owe their newly found success to the cartoon! And the comic book was amazing! How could you not add those two characters to the Movie? They would do nothing but add more exictment and deliver great scenes to the movie! Let's get it together Marvel! We want to see them in the movie!
hush - 7/25/2010, 6:12 PM
As much as Ant-Man and Wasp are part of the Avengers mythos, I can't see where you would put them in the movie. We've all seen what happens when you have too many characters on screen; you never know what is going on and the whole thing becomes a mess (I present to you exhibit A, my copy of Spider-Man 3). I just don't see the point of including them.

And if they were being considered for the sequel, I'd sooner include Quicksilver and Scarlett Witch over 'The Pyms'.
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 6:23 PM
tea: I agree. Although Stark has more of an Ultimate personality, Iron Man and Thor look mainstream marvel. This is going to be an amalgam of the two universes for sure.

Regardless, it's looking promising.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 6:29 PM
I heard Joe Johnston say that Captian America and the Avengers would be based off of the newer comics. The black nick fury, caps outfit, and the modern settings screams Ultimates! They just didn't put it in the title! Tell me how Hawkeye is a better fit than Ant-Man and Wasp. Do you know what the Hulk will do to his bow and arrows, name one character Hawkeye can beat in the Marvel Universe... good or bad? Him and Wasp should have to fight for the last spot. Lol
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 6:33 PM
FirstLady: Have you ever read any Avenger books besides the Ultimates? Hawkeye has kicked the crap out of cosmic characters, put down time travelers and been the last one standing to save the rest of The Avengers asses many, many times.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 6:37 PM
@Hawksblueyes yeah I bet!!!!! He's a fake ass Robin Hood. He was the last one standing cause after he finished hiding then he came out when the fight was over. I like the DC version better of the guy with the Bow and Arrow... HawkEye and his pink boots.
WireySpindell - 7/25/2010, 6:39 PM
WELL SAID.
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 6:46 PM
FirstLady: Thats one Hell of an arguement there. Have some information before you spout off about something cluelessly.

Read this. LOL

Gab - 7/25/2010, 6:55 PM
@Hawsblueyes anwer the Ladies question! Name one person in the Marvel Universe that HawkEye can beat! Do you know what would happen if The Hulk caught him aiming his bow and arrow at him? He couldn't shit for a week. P.S. Back in 1962 when that comic book was made I'm sure Hawk Eye had it going on before people carried handguns I beat you he was the shit!
twiztied - 7/25/2010, 6:55 PM
Hawkeye is the shit. He's marvels Batman and Green Arrow in one guy. The first one in the last ine out. Read some material before u run it.
Ven0m - 7/25/2010, 6:57 PM
I like LEEs pick for Hank and Jan! Seriously why is black widow in this! Hank and Jan are a must! Redeem your selves with the shitty banner cast please marvel!
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 7:02 PM
Gab: I'm not about to make a list for someone who not only doesn't really care and has their mind made up, but only asked the question in order to be a smart ass and derogative.

As for guns making you a badass and untouchable, we are dealing in a complete fantasy world here my man and if a man called Captain america can charge you behind his shield while you empty your gun at him, and then kick your ass, why can't a man with a bow shoot you before you can pop a cap in his ass.

Just to humor you though: Kang, Ultron, The Collector and Kronos in a Marvel DC crossover but the list can go on forever.

Read some original Avengers comics, you may find you like them.
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 7:12 PM
Badassery: My new favorite word. Thanks tea! ;}

Badassery!!!
Negrodamus - 7/25/2010, 7:14 PM
,You guys shouldn't forget Eva Longoria.. she could very well play an additional character in the universe..
D1Puck1T - 7/25/2010, 7:36 PM
The original Avengers lineup was 4 guys and one girl.

This upcoming blockbuster has considerably increased the number of heroes we'll be seeing - we'll have Hulk, Thor, Iron Man, as well as Captain America, Nick Fury, Hawkeye, and even War Machine (according to Cheadle's contract, at least). And, oh, yes, Black Widow.

Seven male heroes, one woman, and the only gal that was there in the comics at the start has been cut. And this has Joss Whedon, of all people, at the helm.

Pretty lame, and I think it goes to show just how used people are to the deeply ingrained sexism in comics that nobody seems to be commenting it.
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 7:49 PM
D1Puck1T: Cheadle said he didn't know if he would be in The Avengers and I would say it's a good guess that Hulk will not be a functioning member for long. that leaves 4 guys and 1 girl. :)
Ranger14 - 7/25/2010, 8:08 PM
"Alot can happen..maybe Whedon drops dead from a heart attack and somebody else comes in for director/writer and says.."I want my Pyms Dammit"..keep the faith my friend.>)"

Do you really think the Pyms not being in the Avengers will come down to a Whedon decision over what Marvel wants? If Marvel wants the Pyms we will see the Pyms. If they don't, then we won't see them. To blame it on Whedon is ridiculous.

It seems pretty clear that FirstLady hasn't read much for the Avengers comics.
D1Puck1T - 7/25/2010, 8:08 PM
No, that would leave 5 men - I'm counting heroes in the movie, not just "Avengers" which means including Fury (one of the main characters, according to Zack Penn). And whether or not Hulk is a "functioning member" for long, he'll likely have a prominent role in the movie. As opposed to the various Avengers heroines that, y'know... won't be in the movie at all. So it's more like 6 male heroes to one woman, provided Cheadle's not in it.
Gab - 7/25/2010, 8:09 PM
@Hawksblueyes just having fun with you bro. I like Hawkeye, but he will just be a role character. Trust me we know who will be the big dogs in this movie. I feel FirstLady too though I'm sure she was looking foward to seeing Wasp and Ant-Man in the movie. Nice article check out my write ups too. 1 Luv
Hawksblueyes - 7/25/2010, 8:15 PM
Gab: Not a problem. That's what makes The avengers so cool, the fact that there are mere men fighting beside Gods and superpowered men in armor. They are all role players that make up one hell of an ass kicking team.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 8:34 PM

First of all Gab you are right I just wanted to see them in the movie like I see them in the Comics now! I have no idea why all these assholes are trying to make it seem like I am the only one that wants this. @Ranger14 you don't know what I have read, I know that Wasp and Ant-Man founded the Avengers and that is a big reason why I would expect them to be in the movie. You should read the comics. Is it because I am a woman that I can't have an opinion? The only reason they won't be in the movie is because their special effects would send the budget too high, and they wouldn't have enough because of all the other characters special effects. Or they might just have bigger plans for them in another movie. Either way look at the rest of the comments and see how many people want HANK AND JANET!
skidz - 7/25/2010, 8:50 PM
DannyRand401: Finally an objective take on the Avengers! Yes, it's probably a smashup of both versions. The ONLY concrete references to the Ultimates are Samuel L. Jackson as Nick Fury and Steve Rogers Captain America uniform. Though you did forget the classic Iron Man villains, IronMonger and Whiplash. Chances are the only uniform(at this point, I don't think the word 'costume' applies) update they could go for is Clint Barton/Hawkeye. I wouldn't be surprised to see him looking like the Ultimates version. The classic Avengers look for Hawkeye may work on paper, but it may need a little tweaking for a wider audience.
113 - 7/25/2010, 9:26 PM
mmm Morena Baccarin is hot, i like here (hot in V too)
Ranger14 - 7/25/2010, 9:35 PM
FirstLady@ My comment to you is based strictly on your comments as far as Hawkeye goes. I should have made that clearer, so my apology. If you have read the comics you would not question how tough he is. I have probably been reading comics since you have been a twinkle in your parents eyes, so I wouldn't go that route with me. I would make the same comment whether it were a female or male saying that Hawkeye couldn't beat anyone in the Marvel Universe. The comics clearly illustrate that isn't the case.

I want the Pyms in the first Avengers film, but only if they can do the character development justice. This isn't just about CBM fans, it is about marketing a film to the mainstream public. I get that and no matter how much of fanboys and fangirls we are, you have to look at things practically from a studio viewpoint. The last thing they want to do is cram in a bunch of characters and not be able to make them work into the scheme of things. I have said a while back that Hank and Wasp are going to be more difficult to portray on the big screen and that may be part of the hesitation. It is too early for us to jump to any conclusions. We don't know for a fact that they won't be in the first film. If they aren't, I will live with it. Not much of any other choice if that is the case.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 9:46 PM
@Ranger14 It's obvious you are a Hawkeye fan and you would be upset if he wasn't in the movie so why can't i be upset that the people i want in it aren't????? Yea your right I shouldn't go there with you, I am young, but I am not a 55 year old blad lonely man with a Hawkeye tramp stamp! That reads comics while sitting at the kitchen table eating Peanut butter and jelly sandwhiches and a glass of warm milk. Get over it you got your way, just my opinion that the Pyms needed to be in it! Hope you sleep good tonight in your Hawkeye nighties!!!!! LMAO
Upupandaway - 7/25/2010, 9:54 PM
@Ranger14- It's also about getting movie fans into the comic shops. I see these movies as comics evangelism. If I wanted things just like the comics, I would just read the comics (which I do). Marvel is bringing these characters to the screen. I can see the movies and read the comics and visualize those characters occupying the same space. They're not exactly the same, but they are putting a lot of effort toward putting these comic book legacies on the silver screen.

@DannyRand401- What you said.
ckal - 7/25/2010, 10:38 PM
@firstlady

Relax troll. Who do you think a guy that shrinks to an inch can beat? Yeah didn't think so. Hawkeye is awesome. He and his equipment are both insanely useful to the Avengers.

If you people who are so set on Pym actually want them to be in a film with an ensemble cast without being properly introduced first, you don't truly like the character that much. They wouldn't be able to do them justice without them being intro'd in a movie first, like every other single memeber of the Avengers movie so far except Hawkeye (who can be introduced fairly easily since his origins can be made as pretty much anything they need).
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 10:42 PM
@ckal I am sure you know everything about these movies. WOW what would we do without you. Go buy a cup of coffee with your 2 cents.
AsianAvenger - 7/25/2010, 10:46 PM
Great article and I am also satisfied with the The Avengers line up. The only thing that disappoints me is of course no Antman or Wasp (as of yet) but as long as it includes the big 3 of Thor, Ironman, and Captain America I'll be happy with it.

Jensen Ackles for Antman!!!
Evangeline Lilly for The Wasp!!!
Ranger14 - 7/25/2010, 10:51 PM
First Lady@ I apologize for not making my comment to you clearer and I point out that I was only referring to how you reference Hawkeye as not being able to beat anyone in the Marvel Universe and you translate that into me being a Hawkeye fanboy and then make disrespectful comments to me? Not very lady like. Not once did I say I was glad that Hawkeye was cast and the Pyms weren't. Reread my post. Actually, I am not a Hawkeye fan, but I know older comics well and will point out when someone states a mistruth as a number of others have pointed out to you as well. Truth be told I would rather see Hank and Janet in the movie than Hawkeye, but I am not going to have a tizzy over the decision the powers at be have made. Add in the fact we still don't know if the Pyms are definitely not going to be in the film. Perhaps a little patience and let's wait and see before people freak out too much more?

Upupandaway@ I get that it is marketing for Marvel and DC, though I think most movie viewers know that they are never going to see many films that are completely true to source material and it is more about the cash in at the theater, action figures, etc. I don't think selling comic books is high on their priority list, but I may be wrong in regard to that. Thanks for pointing it out.
FirstLady - 7/25/2010, 10:56 PM
Hold up you all are trying to blast me and Gab was talking shit too! Ain't nobody jump down his throat, You started kissing his ass. I know why... cause he is a man, that is terrible! @ckal you didn't see his comments did you? Yeah I bet, you liked him since he wrote his first article on Chris Evans. and @Hawksblueyes you are a coward, You talked about me explaining yourself to Gab and he got on Hawk eye too! Man this unbelievable, I got you alot of pub tonight. Your welcome cause this article sucked and you know it. 80% of these comments was to me!
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.