THE FANTASTIC FOUR: 4 Things You Need To Know About Marvel Studios Rumored New Take On Galactus
Related:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: 4 Things You Need To Know About Marvel Studios Rumored New Take On Galactus

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: Marvel Studios May Have Some VERY Unique Plans For Galactus - Possible SPOILERS
Recommended For You:

THE FANTASTIC FOUR: Marvel Studios May Have Some VERY Unique Plans For Galactus - Possible SPOILERS

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5
Kevwebsz
Kevwebsz - 7/31/2015, 2:38 AM
eeeh
GentleGiant
GentleGiant - 7/31/2015, 2:38 AM
Still cnot feeling it yet
alibaba3317
alibaba3317 - 7/31/2015, 2:40 AM
the dialogue sounds so camp
kylo0607
kylo0607 - 7/31/2015, 2:40 AM
Looks very bad.. And the CGI in those spots was awful.
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 2:55 AM
There's an embargo on reviews until 1 day before the film arrives. lol. Clear sign of a crappy film.
pepe
pepe - 7/31/2015, 3:01 AM
Im groot
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 3:05 AM
@Doopie: Name the movies.
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 3:11 AM
@Doopie: Every MCU film had reviews well in advance. Non MCU films generally sucked. Get ready to be disappointed.
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 3:33 AM
@Jeight: Reviews from sweaty nerds do not count.
SteamBlust
SteamBlust - 7/31/2015, 3:44 AM
@Luminus: Mad Max and Jurassic World had an embargo until day 1. Just sayin.
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 3:55 AM
@SteamBlust: Jurassic World sucked, apparently. The fact that it made so much money is the same reason Transformers movies continue to make so much money. As for Mad Max, there's always an exception to the rule. I haven't seen either movie.
DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 7/31/2015, 3:57 AM
@SteamBlust

Both Mad Max and Jurassic World had early reviews/reactions of the movies 10-15 days, maybe more, before they were released

And, the reactions were more than, one word, (i.e "amazing") they actually talked about performances in the movies and specifics, to let the audience know what to expect

Just saying
Tetrahedron
Tetrahedron - 7/31/2015, 4:01 AM
NO MORE FANSHITIC FOUR

DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 7/31/2015, 4:02 AM
@SteamBlust

For Mad Max there was buzz way early on.... They screened the movie a year in advance!

"Even though Mad Max: Fury Road isn't hitting theaters until May 2015, there's apparently a good enough version of it out there to screen for fans - and even start a huge mega-buzz for George Miller's over-budget production."

Reactions from that screening....

"Just came from a year in advance screening of "Mad Max Fury Road". Weird to not see Gibson as Max but Tom Hardy holds it down just fine. Great action sequences and amazing post apocalyptic vehicles and costuming with awesome makeup."

“This movie feels like thirty years of Miller holding in passion for a world that he built so long ago, exploding on the screen… You want groovy cars? By the car-carrier load! You want auto combat? Parts strewn for miles! You want practical f/x and stunts? I wonder how many on the stunt team died making this madness?!"

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/05/01/mad-max-fury-road-gets-strong-early-screening-reactions
thunderforce
thunderforce - 7/31/2015, 4:31 AM
shit movie
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 4:35 AM
@Jeight: Another bad sign is what the marketing team is doing. The first trailer was all about science and discovery. It looked like the trailer for Interstellar. Now, suddenly, the trailers are all about power and Kanye West music, which is SOOOO out of left field for a movie like this it's not even funny. It would be like having an Avengers trailer playing "Empire State of Mind" by Jay-Z featuring Alicia Keys.
Mikeg1965
Mikeg1965 - 7/31/2015, 5:02 AM
No "Marvel Produced" Film ever had an embargo placed on it, Marvel actually likes the Word of Mouth Buzz' it's Films get. So', this doesn't look good for FOX.
GetsugaTensho22
GetsugaTensho22 - 7/31/2015, 5:16 AM
Typical fan-boys finding stupid reasons to justify their own blind hate.
Look, movies have review embargo's. End of story. This is a standard practice. There's no great conspiracy here. Nobody's trying to hide anything!

This movie could be crap, true. But there's literally no obvious reasons for you to assume that yet. If you donj't like it, be honest to yourself and everybody by saying it. Don't justify it by blaming an outside factor. Don't come up with false BS.
chriskrispy
chriskrispy - 7/31/2015, 5:19 AM
Whenever MS movies got Twitter buzz, it's usually indicitave of the final product. Like for Ultron, "It's good, but the first is better." Ant-Man "It gets better as it goes along." Whenever a film gets "Wow what a fantastic fantastic film this is boy is it gonna turn heads wow what a great cast" you probably screened your movie to employees. Or Mad Max happened to be on the projecter and nobody changed it.
grif
grif - 7/31/2015, 5:21 AM
cant wait for this movie to burn in hell
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 7/31/2015, 5:30 AM
Most major films have an embargo on reviews these days... The point being to hold things back and then flood the press with news about the film at the most opportune time for marketing purposes. For the average film that is usually early in the week before release. For example, contrary to what was claimed above, this summer's Mad Max opened on May 15th yet the first 30+ reviews for it were published on May 11th, with a steadily increasing amount throughout the week.

Keeping the embargo on reviews going all the way until the film actually starts playing is usually a sign that the marketing team thinks the flood of reviews can only hurt a film instead of build word for it. Even mediocre films don't usually do this, with the thought being that most people don't really weigh reviews all that heavily for popcorn fare, and that the scattering of positive reviews will at least help bring in the people on the fence who see those ones.

There is a level of "embargo" that's an even worse sign, of course... That's not screening a film for critics at all. That means that each critic has to wait until the film is playing, buy a ticket, watch the film, then go write their review and get it in their paper or on their site, thereby keeping most critics from bothering to review it at all and having those that do not get word out until a day or two after the film starts playing.

In this case, I have to feel that the studio is looking at good tracking going into opening weekend, and really don't want to trip that up by risking bad reviews knowing that the online community has been waiting to pounce on this film for a year or more, and will therefore trumpet any suggestion that the film sucks far and wide.
jj72
jj72 - 7/31/2015, 5:47 AM
Other movies this year with a similar embargo to FF are Aloha and Pixels. Not good company. Fox wants reviews held back so it doesn't impact advance ticket sales. Other studios do the same when they know the movie isn't that great.
Mankzin2
Mankzin2 - 7/31/2015, 5:54 AM
If this movie beats Ant-Man by 1 million, i will call it a huge success. The FF needs to stay at Fox so It doesn't get the kiddy friendly Disney treatment, because Doom is one of the top villain at Marvel. Plus I doubt it will revert back to Marvel, Fox will just through them into other X-Men movies in order to keep all the characters. It's the smart thing to do and the right thing to do. I will be seeing this next Friday.
Mankzin2
Mankzin2 - 7/31/2015, 5:58 AM
Just because there is embargo doesn't mean its crap. Most movies don't even put on the critic review commercial until the second week, plus this movie looks really good as it is being set in the X-Men universe.
Mankzin2
Mankzin2 - 7/31/2015, 6:01 AM
Doom looks bad ass in these spots.
dfresh
dfresh - 7/31/2015, 6:04 AM
This community is filled with marketing experts. @chewtoy gave the only well-rationed statement here.
DrKinsolving
DrKinsolving - 7/31/2015, 6:08 AM
@dfresh

I listed straight up facts....

But, you get bonus points for your Three Amigos avatar, haha
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2015, 6:10 AM
@GetsugaTensho22

@Mankzin2

Ahem:

At 28:29:



It's not just musings from "fanboys" as you defenders are claiming.

@dfresh: chewtoy agrees with us.
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 7/31/2015, 6:20 AM
@Luminus

@Doopie

What is the point of the review embargo? If the people will say that is too good or too bad, only if the movie is solid shit is that at less 50 % of the reviews will say it is and that never happen.

Jurassic World is a good action movie, but is the story have so many things going on and dont have the same good message of the first two.

Terminator Genisys is a bad movie, that irrespect the first two movies and try to erase the last two, only to become deep shit.

Even Ant Man is one of that movies that is not great, is not even the best Marvel could have done with this character, if only Darren Cross would have been more evil and make human experiments, only if Scott would have been a real criminal and not a robin hood and only if the movie would have been some cool original soundtrack...

Mad Max: Fury Road is that kind of movie that deserves more of what it gets.

What is Fantastic Four?

I dont know, i dont really know, the same crap of always? Maybe because i dont know what more they can do with the origin story of this characters, maybe be more original?
AleSir19
AleSir19 - 7/31/2015, 6:24 AM
@Luminus

@Doopie

Maybe is time to erase Dr. Doom of the next origin story? I dont know Fantastic Four is that kind of characters that i dont know if Marvel could use, the same with X-Men, because they alredy change everything around that side of their universe.
xcan
xcan - 7/31/2015, 6:25 AM
near day of review embargo + NO 3D on a CBM = NO confidence from studio on the project.

last night's "reviews" were simply from the Mikey b Jordan circle jerk assoc. (est. 1999) and 5 of @King Patel aliases.

nothing to see here folks with this dump of a movie, move along...
1 2 3 4 5
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder