Which heroes/villains deserve to be in The Avengers 2 and 3?

wolverine and the sentinels

heroes

-hank pym(yellow jacket)
-wasp
-vision
-scarlet witch
-wonder man
-ms.marvel
-black panther
-captain marvel
-sentry

villains

-ultron
-kang
-masters of evil
-thanos

if contracts didnt get in the way dark avengers in avengers 3 or 4 once their done with thanos

agreed

Actually the super skrull is the only skrull exclusively owned by the FF people. Everything else is shared property

Cool! I dig many of the choices. Ant-Man and Vision I think are shoe-ins, we're getting them whether we want them or not(most want them :P). One thing I want to rant on though... I want somebody to give me 1 good reason why Coulson can't be Vision, and personal preference DOES NOT COUNT lol. Personally, I'd rather we never have Vision if we have to go through all the Wonder Man shit. I don't even care if Clark plays Vision or not, but Agent Coulson should be the one and easily fits the bill as the person whose brainwave algorithms are used to give Vision personality. It's already there, it's set up and sooo logical and so much easier. I honestly feel like those against it are objecting purely on a fanboy basis. Prove me wrong, gimme 1 logical reason why not, just 1 and I'll shut up about it.

So many thing allude to it anyway that I think it's a forgone conclusion. They went out of their way to toss in some foreshadowing to Coulson becoming Vision, my favorite being the reference to his cellist girlfriend. And yes there was a med team on site the moment Fury stepped back from his body, go watch it again if you don't believe it. I strongly get the idea that Pym (with Ultron and Vision) is part of Phase 2 and that Ultron will be the reason the Avengers separate themselves from SHIELD.

Heroes I'd like to see in the MCU (not just Avengers Roster) by the 3rd flic:
Black Panther
Dr. Strange
Namor
Luke Cage and Iron Fist
Ms. Marvel
Vision
Nova
Inhumans

Villains:
Ultron
Enchantress
Taskmaster***
return of Red Skull
AIM
Hydra

hmmmmmm.... MightyMoHawk didn't know the Namor is licensed by Sony..
Anyway... I'm not sure if all the characters MightMoHawks said should get solo movies.. I think TV or Cable movies and then place the character in an Avengers sequel.. The saturation of these characters in the thearters would be a bad mistake. The thing is these movies are a driving force in the economy.. The quality has to stay great. And hopefully D.C. Comics puts out quality films as well.
...........................

Black Panther should be in Capt America's movie sequel possibly in flashback scenes.. And I still say a joint effort should be done to share licensed characters held by Sony & Fox with Disney/Marvel should be done for future Marvel movies..
But greed will get in the way..

i disagree with some of your conclusions on who would need a solo film and who would not.

Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, Pym and Wasp could all be introduced through other characters movies and could be part of a greater story line (i.e secret invasion).

Captain Marvel's human alias could be introduced during one of the upcoming IM, Cap, or Avengers movie. So too, could Carol Danvers and the Pyms. Their origins somewhat tie into the larger story and add to it as they are introduced, thus making the characters more intriguing and important to the genreal viewing audience.

Solo movies to introduced characters should be saved for "larger" characters like Black Panther. But none of these chracters should just be dropped in your lap; they all need and deserve their setup from the larger Marvel properties currently in the MCU.

i pretty much agree with u, JokerFanHAhaHA, since they used alien invasion, i'd rather see the Skrulls saved for one of the FF movies.
the points for having them appear in Avengers 2 or 3 are that first, they are pretty radically different in their shape changing ability. i don't think it'd be hordes of Skrulls flying down on New York, it might have more of a smaller, paranoid, horror movie type tone to it, as they began to discover who the Skrulls had already gotten to.
and then secondly, if u look at the original Star Wars, the big armies in each film were Stormtroopers, just dressed a little different. not a perfect example becuz they all covered a pretty unified story arc. but still, it shows that it's really the bad guys pulling the strings that make it work or not.
(i don't think they got away with pulling the Death Star out twice, tho. i mean, there's something sort of cool and pulpy about how simple it was, but they're lucky that worked out ok)
Skrulls like Scarlet Witch and Quicksilver are things that i remember Feige, i think, saying were shared property. but for Wanda and Pietro, Marvel couldn't mention anything about mutants and Fox couldn't mention them being Avengers.

a oerfect reason for COULSON NOT BEING VISION? they (shield) WOULD NOT save coulsons brain algorithms. FOR YRS ON THE OFF CHANCE THEY MAY BE VALUABLE

it IS only a pipedream prolonged by "fanboys" like you no offense

good i truly meant it with all due respect but as i stated; you wanted a GOOD reason, and thats a beaut!

easy for audiences to understand he's "PYM" but not any more! which is ripe for existential analysis in A3

my ideas are copyrighted too lol i'll straight up sue MARVEL if they copy my ideas

I'm pretty excited to see what Phase 2 will encompass.

character NO story YES lol learn legality

there is DOCUMENTATION; you understand that? ;)