See Michael Shannon Display His Villainous Skills In New Trailer For THE ICEMAN

badass

The Ice Man interviews on HBO were crazy, hope this'll be a good flick.

Did you read the article?

my uncle met kuklinski in prison , said he was nice enough and quite

AMAZING I have to support the General on this one

Michael Shannon's star is on the rise.
Only a matter of time before he gets his just desserts.

Michael Shannon is the least of my worries in Man of Steel.

@ InfiniteMonkey - I think that's why he took on a job like Superman, a bad/boring Superman movie without 3D/IMAX still made $400 Million. Imagine how well a good, if not great, Superman movie could make with Zack Snyder at the helm.

Zod made Terrence Stamp a household name, Shannon is probably going to enjoy the same from the same character.

I think that's why he accepted the role, if he does a great job at Zod he could be the hottest thing in Hollywood. Kind of like how Heath Ledger, had he not died, would've been Hollywood's most sought-after actors in the world or how RDJ's career became revived with Iron Man or Nolan's directorship became more considered legendary after The Dark Knight.

Nah I'm gonna be reporting them from now on. As editors we answer to one man - the owner of the site. I've been doing thsi long enough not to have to put up with people questioning me about articles..if you don't like it, lump it!

Hey, if it is a new qualification for articles to make the site and main, I have no challenge with it. If you prevent users from putting up similar articles, which has been done before, it's called a double standard. Perhaps you aren't familiar with that term.

The guy's called Iceman. Same as the guy from X-Men. There's the comicbook qualification to be on this website lol.

I remember watching his interviews on HBO when I was a kid. The stuff he said he did while having a straight face as he's telling it is chilling. Gave the ten year old me (or however old I was lol) nightmares. It's on YouTube if any of you want to check it out.

Shannon should play Agent 47 in another Hitman movie (reboot, obviously). When he's talking to Franco's character especially, with that suit he's wearing too, he looks EXACTLY like the Agent 47 that I know from the games (minus the bald head though).

@ Ror and Ranger - Are you seriously having an argument over this?

Guys,
Here are the rules. And MY word is law.

1. Articles on the main must be about comic book movies OR have some relevance to comic book movies that our users would find interesting. I LEAVE THAT TO THE EDITORS TO DECIDE.

2. Are there some exceptions for slow news days, etc? YES. I LEAVE THAT TO THE EDITORS TO DECIDE. THAT IS WHAT BEING AN EDITOR IS ALL ABOUT.

3. Are there some cases where the editors (or users who vote something on the main) make the wrong the decision? YES. AND AS THE EDITOR-IN-CHIEF I ALONE MAKE THAT CALL. I AM THE FINAL SAY ON EVERYTHING. IT IS MY SITE. SO HARASSING THE EDITORS IS SILLY. DON'T CONFUSE ONE OF MY HELPERS AS HAVING THE SAME POWER THAT I DO.

4. Is there a double-standard? HELL YES! When I give someone privileges to be an editor of the site, they are acting on my behalf. They EARNED greater trust and YES, PREFERENCE on the site. DUH! But before you cry "INJUSTICE," realize that ANYONE can earn these same privileges who wants them. I am ALWAYS on the lookout for users that want to HELP the site, and who I can trust with greater responsibility.

5. Have editors been booted for abusing their power. YES! Ask around, some are still here. Editors are just elevated users LIKE YOU. They are not perfect.

6. Do some users on this site get booted for being too whiny about this internal stuff? YES THEY DO. ESPECIALLY THE ONES WHO TROLL EDITORS. If you have a problem, bring it to me (see below).

Here endeth the lesson.

Love, Galactus

P.S., And if anyone has legitimate complaints, send me an email: Galactus(at)ComicBookMovie.com. I am NOT appreciative when comments sections get clogged up with this complaining crapola. If I see too much of it--especially from the same people, they will lose their accounts.

P.P.S., Every Sunday night I have instituted a "meet the management" chat in our chatroom for these kinds of complaints and questions about how we do things around here. Hopefully, that will get rid of some of this in the comments sections. Check the calendar to see dates and times.

Ranger, nah, a good 90% of your posts that I see are moans and complaints. And you're also wrong about the so called "abuse" of power. You don't think the thumbs up system can also be abused? We had countless articles appearing on main that the author had asked for the thumbs up on, which we would then remove - as I said, for good reason (either badly written, sloppy, irrelevant etc), but if the article was salvageable with some work we'd mail the user and explain what they needed to change to get it back on main. So by all means keep complaining..but I know, most other people know, and I think deep down you know that you're complaining about nothing.

Ranger,
Have you even written an article for the site? It seems all you do is comment on here. So, unless you've had first hand experience with this "abuse of power," you should probably not assume that you understand what is going on behind-the-scenes. Also, it is probably worth noting that having seen how much trash talk there is about the editors on this site, I think everybody should realize that embittered ex-contributors may not be the best sources or have all the facts.

all over that shit. when????

People really do complain too much on here, I have been saying that for months now. Can't just be grateful of all the mazing movies we keep getting but it really is just the same old people that complain.

Fair enough, I guess people missed the part where I have no issue with this type of article as long as volunteer contributors are also allowed the same liberty, which is promoted by the site. Time will tell, but Galactus makes the rules and if he decides editors have more flexibility to do so, that is his call.

Ror@ I would say that it is more accurate to say 90% of my complaints are directed to some of your pulling of articles off of main. I would say perhaps a half a dozen articles I have commented on this over the past year, if you see that as excessive, oh well. There are plenty of others who have called you on it as well.

MagicPuppy@ I wrote one article a long time ago, when I had time to do so. I run a business and don't have time to write articles, but it doesn't mean I haven't witnessed articles that have been moved off of main that I feel the author has done a good job, but that is my opinion. I appreciate the efforts of those who do put in the time to write articles and are trying to make the main page, do so and then get the article yanked. If I were to go into all the details, I would be labeled by some as more of a complainer.

For those who have been around here for a long time, they know that I am not a "complainer" and if I do have a challenge with a subject or film, I am respectful but direct about it, rather than name-calling, etc. I have never been reported here for anything, at least as far as I know. That may have changed today, I guess. :-P

"For those who have been around here for a long time, they know that I am not a "complainer" and if I do have a challenge with a subject or film, I am respectful but direct about it, rather than name-calling, etc. I have never been reported here for anything, at least as far as I know. That may have changed today, I guess. :-P"

No worries Ranger14, I know you are not one of the troublemakers who constantly stalk and harass the editors, which is why you get a pass from my wrath.;) Just understand that these guys get a helluvalotta undeserved crapola from users who ASSUME some things incorrectly. For instance, only I take things off the main. And anytime an editor wants to, they have to run it by me first.