TOTAL RECALL: Movie Review

TOTAL RECALL: Movie Review

My thoughts on the recent "Total Recall" remake starring Colin Farrel. Is it better than the original Arnie movie? Is it even worth your time? Will you see nipples?

Total Recall is visually stunning, you shouldn't need any other reason to go see it. The city looks far from original, in fact it is very reminiscent of Blade Runner, but it is is so much grander than Blade Runner that it is easily forgivable. Basically, anyone hoping to see Ridley Scott and his great "world building" take a stab at another Blade Runner with today's technology should give up that hope, this movie will never be outdone in the "Believable World Building" department. When the world goes to hell and humanity really has no other options but to start building "up" to survive in the few habitable parts of Earth we will look back at the Total Recall remake and say that it was more realistic.

The second best part of the movie is obviously that it has very attractive female stars. The director payed special attention to making sure that Kate Beckinsale's white cotton panty clad butt did not accidentally get left out of her one skin scene in the movie, despite the scene being relatively serious. Even fully clothed Beckinsale is extremely hot when she is pissed off and rampaging. Jessica Biel, often cast as "the sexy one" these days seemed dressed down and plain compared to Beckinsale, maybe it was intentional. In fact Biel only smiles once that I can remember in the whole film, but it definitely perked up a rather dreary scene.

The homages to the original movie are pretty well done. We do see three nipples, I know that it is a spoiler, but some people don't see movies without nipple in them, and this one has three! I thought that we were just going to get triple cleavage based on the trailer and comic con, but I was pleasantly surprised. There are some other homages that are pretty iconic that I wont spoil, but I think that most will appreciate.

Now it is time for criticism. The big picture problem in this movie starts out very good; I'm talking about the new equivalent to Mars being without oxygen. After the introduction of the problem the interesting-ness quickly starts to fade as they start adding on aspects of other movies that are just so extremely obvious. If you are seeing this movie, then you've most likely seen those other movies, and the plot points that they use weren't the most original in those other movies. When the climax finally hits, again, it is ripped from another movie.

The big problem that I think everyone will notice in the first 30 seconds of the movie is that they killed one of the most important plot points of the original movie right off the bat. They try to play ambiguous later on, but unless you are really slow you aren't going to fall for it as an audience member; it's believable to the characters though. There is a little cheap laugh at the end that kind of has fun with it though.

As unoriginal as the story is I found it easy to let it slide. Whenever my hopes for something original were dashed the story kept on running smoothly. The story is nothing new, but it still flows smoothly and works well.

I say that it is a must see simply for the visuals, consider the story a bonus.
Posted By:
Member Since 11/20/2008
Filed Under "Sci-Fi" 8/3/2012
DISCLAIMER: is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]
Moakynubs - 8/3/2012, 10:37 PM
I stopped reading after "hot chicks". Never when I see a movie do I go "Wow, this is great because the girls are all really good looking", but hey maybe that's just me.
HarrisonBergeron - 8/3/2012, 11:19 PM
I'm confused, did you not read the first paragraph where I stated that the main reason to see it is the visuals?

I go to see movies for the story. This story is incredibly unoriginal, so I chose to highlight the movie's strong points first as I believe that it is worth seeing despite its flaws.

HarrisonBergeron - 8/3/2012, 11:24 PM
I'll break it down like this, reasons to see this movie:

90% visual effects
5% Attractive stars
5% Easter eggs from original movie
HarloweThrombey - 8/3/2012, 11:58 PM
We are in the 21st century with unlimited CGI and virtual 3D effects. Visual Effects are NO REASON AT ALL to see a movie anymore. If that's all it has going for it, then it doesn't deserve to be seen. With the internet, there's a library of over a million FREE and GOOD streaming movies. There's no time left in our lives, for crappy stories. Just no time left. All movies from this point in history forward seen by our human eyes, should be GREAT. Or else we should just watch something else from the past, that we haven't caught up on yet, on the internet or on cable. If we need a night out and there are no good movies playing at the local theater, then go to an art theater. Or see a play. Or stay home. Crappy movies do not deserve our money. They are an insult to our Age of Information, and to our Intelligence as individuals, and as a species.

Thank you for your review; I now know to not see this awful movie.

HarrisonBergeron - 8/4/2012, 12:18 AM
The highest grossing film of all time was a rehash of a rehash of a rehash story wise, yet it set a record that will likely stand for decades. People did not see Avatar because they were Sam Worthington fans, they saw it because of it's stunning visuals that pushed the limits of modern technology.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.