New X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Images With Hugh Jackman & Jennifer Lawrence

New X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Images With Hugh Jackman & Jennifer Lawrence

The latest issue of Total Film magazine has a nice batch of new X-Men: Days of Future Past images, with Hugh Jackman, James McAvoy, Ian McKellen, and Jennifer Lawrence. Check it out.

Special thanks to AidarSM

The ultimate X-Men ensemble fights a war for the survival of the species across two time periods in X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST. The beloved characters from the original “X-Men” film trilogy join forces with their younger selves from “X-Men: First Class,” in an epic battle that must change the past – to save our future.

X-Men: Days Of Future Past will be directed by Bryan Singer ("Usual Suspects"). The cast includes: Hugh Jackman, James McAvoy, Ian McKellen, Jennifer Lawrence, Halle Berry, Peter Dinklage, Nicholas Hoult, Ellen Page, Shawn Ashmore, Lucas Till, Evan Peters, Daniel Cudmore, Booboo Stewart, Omar Sy, Fan Bingbing, Evan Jonigkeit, Adan Canto and Josh Helman, X-Men: Days Of Future Past hits UK cinemas on May 22 and US cinemas the following day.
Posted By:
Member Since 7/12/2010
Filed Under "X-Men" 2/12/2014 Source: AidarSM
DISCLAIMER: is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]
1 2 3
Rogers - 2/12/2014, 8:38 AM
XelCorp - 2/12/2014, 8:41 AM
Why don't you give us
the new [Frick]ing trailer
GizmoEl - 2/12/2014, 8:42 AM
Nails on a roll today
Jollem - 2/12/2014, 8:44 AM
must has new trailer
Pasto - 2/12/2014, 8:45 AM
Nail is on a roll, DAMMIT!
Pasto - 2/12/2014, 8:45 AM
Damn you Gizmo, damn you!
Pasto - 2/12/2014, 8:45 AM
I hear reports that Zauri has just entered the building.
JJJameson - 2/12/2014, 8:51 AM
That actually looks cool.
TopCat89 - 2/12/2014, 8:51 AM
Comes out in May, and all we've had is 1 trailer....
Wildaniel - 2/12/2014, 8:54 AM
I still dont understand how young Charles is able to stand and walk, lol.
Wildaniel - 2/12/2014, 8:56 AM
Jennifer Lawrence can push me up against a wall whenever she wants, lol.
TheWolverine08 - 2/12/2014, 8:56 AM
Looking very nice if I say so myself.
JoeMomma29 - 2/12/2014, 8:57 AM
Well he is walking because he is Lt. Dan from Forest Gump!
MexicanSexyman - 2/12/2014, 8:57 AM
This movie is going to own.
Wildaniel - 2/12/2014, 8:58 AM
Wolverine is the one who goes back in time right? Cause him having his bone and metal claws confuses me too, lol.
drunkenjunk - 2/12/2014, 8:59 AM
I had no idea wolverine was in this.
Patrick2274 - 2/12/2014, 9:04 AM
Damn Jackman, i'm not gay but what a body that Hugh has.
SuperCat - 2/12/2014, 9:04 AM
i can see Wolverine's nipples.
Lancer1 - 2/12/2014, 9:06 AM
Shit movie jackman is wasting his talents and his amazing body in this crap
ElDarkside - 2/12/2014, 9:07 AM
Who's wolverine? I thought kitty pride went back in time? Or was it bishop? Xavier walks around?

See.. I can do that too. And It's not funny when I do it either...

This movie is going to kill. They are going to advertise the shit out of this, like avengers... Especially with all the oscar noms/winners in the cast. That is one things the avengers doesn't have on this cast... Academy Award winning actors. Not that it needs them...
MercwithMouth - 2/12/2014, 9:07 AM
Can't wait! Movie looks awesome.

Still don't like Jen Lawrence as Mystique. She's a great Raven, but bad Mystique.

This is better...

Than this...

Jollem - 2/12/2014, 9:11 AM
@DukeNukem - iJackWoodleyGate
newhire13 - 2/12/2014, 9:18 AM
Looks like when Wolverine wakes up in the past he's in the middle of a stand off. And going by the trailer it looks like he offs everyone in the room. Love it :)
WarmAndGushy - 2/12/2014, 9:19 AM
With a budget of 225million it has to double that at the box office to earn its money back,so I think if DOFP earns 500 million they would be happy,Looking forward to this film.I just hope it is as good as X-Men First Class.
m0th3r - 2/12/2014, 9:26 AM
500 million is 100m MORE then Wolverine......and 225 == 550 for even break. Also consider all the money invested and potential return on that investment if it was invested in other projects instead of one that costs 200m and breaks even. Its about percentages of profit on investment and this film will be seriously challenged to do that..
TheGreenRanger - 2/12/2014, 9:27 AM
Singer deserves to be a smear under the Dragon Zord's foot. Shit movie.
WarmAndGushy - 2/12/2014, 9:29 AM
I thought that a film had to earn double its budget to earn its money back,since cinemas take just under a third of the revenue from a film generated at the cinema,that's what the guys at AMC say and they work for cinemas?
m0th3r - 2/12/2014, 9:29 AM
Outside of the money discussion...which is a real issue..

Where is the trailer?!? We have 2.5 Months till this i the only one that thinks they are hiding footage? The reason wolverine made less then all the other big CBMs last year wasnt quality(we can debate the 2nd half..) was the lack of marketing until the last minute...
m0th3r - 2/12/2014, 9:32 AM
Totall..thats the equation i understand... x2 TOTAL costs...thats production + marketing...

SO Fox claims 225 (its probably 250-260...they alway lie some)...that means 500 to break even on production costs alone..not marketing...They are running a pretty ineffective marketing campaign, but its expensive (20+ covers).

Wolverine did 414m. I personally dont think you will have a bigger audience the the last one. There is NOTHING to indicate the Domestic return will be good since it has been pretty bad in recent years. Wolverine did 100m vs 200+ done by Xmen 15+ years ago domestically.

Bottom line..this movie will lose money...this is why Fox has NOT signed Singer for next part yet....
Happy11 - 2/12/2014, 9:34 AM
I see bone claws!
blkchi - 2/12/2014, 9:37 AM
Yeah ad long as its an esemble piece im in ..jackman can have his solo moment at the tonys..great fights with some of the greatest actors alive..patrick stewart has been a godsend je understands his role and never mails in the performance hell both magnetos have acting chops ditto page and berry so u now they can carry the script.
MercwithMouth - 2/12/2014, 9:39 AM

I would argue that The Wolverine didn't make alot of money because of the stigma of the last Wolverine solo film. We all know how bad Origins was. I know even some users on here skipped it purely because of Origins.
NorseGod - 2/12/2014, 9:41 AM
"A time-skipping tale that brings together the cast from X-Men and its sequels and prequel"

That's funny! It's like they really want you to forget about X-Men Origins Wolverine!
m0th3r - 2/12/2014, 9:46 AM
@Merc Maybe, Origins was pretty bad...but look at those domestic numbers on Box Office Mojo..they Rose to X3...then have consistently fallen since. we will know by weekend two...If the movie doesn't open ~100m it totally toast...Wolverine did 53...IM 3 did 175, Thor2 did 85 MoS did 116m....Thats a Monster Delta..

Never got an answer the other day from a Fan..if this doesn't turn a profit what would you want to happen? Reboot at Fox? They wont do another at ALL if it doesnt turn any profit at all..
TheClemster - 2/12/2014, 9:47 AM
@ whysoserious


wtf??? too funny
TheClemster - 2/12/2014, 9:48 AM
@ Supercat

lol that's what you got from the picture???? :)
MercwithMouth - 2/12/2014, 9:53 AM

Not sure what should happen if it doesn't run a profit. I would like to see it revert and have MS lease it to Sony for a specific number of films or years. With what Sony has done with Spidey, I trust them with the X-Men. I need DOFP to make at least $600 million though. Otherwise I have to rock a Superman avi for 2 months!

What's up @Clem!!

RRA - 2/12/2014, 9:56 AM
MercwithMouth - Shockingly, most folks don't want to pay to see a sequel to a movie they didn't like.

Still TW got decent reviews (and Oscar-worthy reviews at least compared to the hate that W:XMO got), an A- Cinemascore, and helped restore luster to the X-Men series like FIRST CLASS did.

NorseGod - Everybody wants to forget W:XMO. Do you blame us? Uggh.
RRA - 2/12/2014, 9:58 AM
"With what Sony has done with Spidey, I trust them with the X-Men."

MercwithMouth - yes I trust the studio who gave us SPIDER-MAN 3. *sarcasm*
MercwithMouth - 2/12/2014, 10:03 AM

No shit. That's what I said about Wolverine. It made less than it should've because of the negative stigma caused by Origins.

How about the studio that made SM1 and SM2? And TASM if that's your cup of tea.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.