MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Responds To Producer Who Said She's Not Pretty, She Can't Act
Related:

MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney Responds To Producer Who Said "She's Not Pretty, She Can't Act"
Hollywood Producer Slams MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney: She's Not Pretty, She Can't Act
Recommended For You:

Hollywood Producer Slams MADAME WEB Star Sydney Sweeney: "She's Not Pretty, She Can't Act"
DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Do you have what it takes to write for us?
Want to contribute?
1 2
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 6/16/2020, 3:50 AM
They really should just throw characters like Jessica Drew and Julia Carpenter (and maybe even Cindy Moon too) in that female Spider-Verse spin-off to see if there really is a demand for these characters first
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 6/16/2020, 7:27 AM
@MalseMarcel - As far i know it does seem we will see Jessica and Cindy in the spin off, though i could be wrong/misremembering it.
JustALurker
JustALurker - 6/16/2020, 7:10 PM
@MalseMarcel - it would be another, Ocean's 8, Ghostbusters 2016 situation. Where the movie is bad and men are blamed for hating it due to sexism.
JDL
JDL - 6/16/2020, 4:10 AM
If these films don't make money look to Sony to get out of the biz. Spidey is their only tentpole IP remaining since they lost Bond.
Saintsinnister
Saintsinnister - 6/16/2020, 4:13 AM
Nobody wants this do they? Maybe a Spider-woman movie, although general audiences have never embraced her as a good character. I’m willing to bet these eventually get scrapped along with all the other lame spin offs that have been put to sleep in the past. Venom was a success because people know that character and love it. A spiderverse with mere Easter eggs of actual Spider-Man is lame.
JustALurker
JustALurker - 6/16/2020, 7:14 PM
@Saintsinnister - I think the only "female version of a popular character" that succeeded as it's own was BatGirl. Hopefully she-hulk too. spider-Women never felt like a B-lister, a C-lister even.
AC1
AC1 - 6/16/2020, 4:43 AM
I don't see why they won't extend their deal with Marvel Studios to other properties. Look how successful the two Spidey movies have been with Marvel Studios working on them - then compare that to Venom which was pretty much just carried by Tom Hardy's star power.

Especially with Spider-Woman, who I'm pretty sure has ties to SHIELD and was a pretty big part of the Avengers comics for a while (I may be wrong there) it'd make sense to do a joint deal with the character guaranteeing connectivity with the MCU and pretty much ensuring a higher quality movie too. And they should do that with the rest of the Spider-Centric characters too.
WeaponXCII
WeaponXCII - 6/16/2020, 4:47 AM
Just like how that Silver and Black movie ended up, right?
L0RDbuckethead
L0RDbuckethead - 6/16/2020, 6:27 AM
@WeaponXCII - This was my exact thought lol
Chewtoy
Chewtoy - 6/16/2020, 6:36 AM
“ there's been a lot of chatter online that the Madame Web movie Sony Pictures is developing will revolve around Julia Carpenter...”

“...fans remain confused as to why Sony Pictures' Universe of Marvel Characters is prioritising an elderly psychic over so many other heroes and villains they hold the rights to.”

...what? Did Julia have a sudden age spurt like Cap now?
JustALurker
JustALurker - 6/16/2020, 7:20 PM
@Chewtoy - we are talking about obscure Spiderman side-characters. Madame webs biggest appearances both had her as an elderly woman. Prolly aunt may of her universe.
KrazyForKomix
KrazyForKomix - 6/16/2020, 6:48 AM
I'm sure this is old news but how is it that Sony has the rights to Spider-Woman? I could POSSIBLY see how they have access to Julia Carpenter. But Jessica Drew?!?
eagc1995
eagc1995 - 6/16/2020, 7:31 AM
@KrazyForKomix - Obiously because of the name Spider-Woman, they own the rights to every version of Spider-Woman regardless if she's tied to Peter or not.

Its the same case as how it was with Fox before the buyout, they had the rights to every single mutant, even if the character has nothing to do with X-Men (Heck back when Perlmutter was throwing tanturms over not having the rights, they put a ban on creating new mutants characters cause they wouldn't own the rights)
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 6/16/2020, 8:28 AM
OMG.....stop. Sony, stick to animation. Y'all are killing it with the Miles stuff. Leave the live action to Marvel Studios. That just ain't your lane.
thepowerofseven
thepowerofseven - 6/16/2020, 1:35 PM
@Tonic24k - haha holy$#!t, I didn't read your entry until just now and wrote almost exactly the same thing! haha well, it's good to know someone agrees!
Tonic24k
Tonic24k - 6/18/2020, 6:21 AM
@thepowerofseven - Yeah dude. It only makes sense and everyone gets some of that Marvel pie.
itzayaboy
itzayaboy - 6/16/2020, 9:02 AM
Why do they think people actually want this? No one wants this.
TheWarThor
TheWarThor - 6/16/2020, 3:04 PM
@zachman2013 - This is what I cannot understand! Nobody asked for this movie. I hope they learn their lesson when the movie bombs.
JustALurker
JustALurker - 6/16/2020, 7:32 PM
@Kiwiavenger - @zachman2013 - the value of the company will be gradually increase with a bigger announced catalogue of movies, this is just a ploy for the investors, I don't recall silver and black being releaced.
1 2
Related Headlines
Related Headlines
Latest Headlines
Latest Headlines

Hot Headlines Hot Headlines

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Cartoons & Animated Features

Gaming

Anime & Manga

Horror

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News

Sci-Fi & Fantasy

Cartoons & Animated Features

Gaming

Anime & Manga

Horror

Action Movies & TV

Pro Wrestling & MMA News
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder