HARRY POTTER Author J.K. Rowling Fires Back At Daniel Radcliffe & Emma Watson For Trans-Rights Support
Related:

HARRY POTTER Author J.K. Rowling Fires Back At Daniel Radcliffe & Emma Watson For Trans-Rights Support

HARRY POTTER Author J.K. Rowling Calls For Her Own Arrest In Protest Of New Hate Crime Laws
Recommended For You:

HARRY POTTER Author J.K. Rowling Calls For Her Own Arrest In Protest Of New Hate Crime Laws

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

dracula
dracula - 11/7/2019, 2:46 AM
Hopefully its good and doesn't prove that JK is the new George Lucas.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 11/7/2019, 4:14 AM
@dracula - atleast Lucas’ stories were actual movie stories unlike Rowling’s book like stories on screen. And yes, I will defend the prequels till the day I die
dracula
dracula - 11/7/2019, 4:25 AM
@MalseMarcel - yeah I enjoy the prequels as well, main problem is some of the dialogue and effects. Say what you will about them, but at least they were original, unlike the sequels.
Nightwing1015
Nightwing1015 - 11/7/2019, 4:26 AM
VicSage
VicSage - 11/7/2019, 2:52 AM
If they're really committed, might as well take another year or two, and write the script for the fourth and fifth one and shoot these films back to back LOTR style. Release them a year apart.
bkmeijer2
bkmeijer2 - 11/7/2019, 4:16 AM
I was just wondering, since I didn’t watch the crimes of grindelwald, if these movies still about the fantastic beasts
MrDandy
MrDandy - 11/7/2019, 7:16 AM
I actually enjoyed the first one quite a bit, but the second was a sloppy mess. Hopefully this third one can right the ship and they can still put out a good series overall.
shadowspider9
shadowspider9 - 11/7/2019, 8:32 AM
Where can you really go with this concept now though?
The first one was just a one and done movie of Newt trying to fix his own mistakes and recapture the beasts that got lost.
Sure that can have sequels, but they wouldn't really be connected sequels. They would play out more like episodes of a tv show Newt about traveling and catching beasts in different lands.

The second movie, however, tried to be this epic war movie. That's a plot that should revolve around Dumbledore. And the movie proves this by having to jump through hoops to keep Dumbledore out of the fight and justify Newt being involved at all.
TheUnworthyThor
TheUnworthyThor - 11/7/2019, 9:20 AM
I just don’t get it. A movie makes 650 million dollars and people are surprised they are moving forward with the series? The same reaction to both this and Ant-man. You know how many big budget movies would kill to have a worldwide box office of 650 million dollars? Most of them.
MovieMonster
MovieMonster - 11/7/2019, 9:54 AM
More focus on Dumbledore and Grindelwald please. I don't find Newt to be an interesting character to begin with.
BlackIceJoe
BlackIceJoe - 11/7/2019, 10:04 AM
So can we officially say Ezra Miller won't be returning as Barry Allen? Because if so, maybe this time WB can find an actor that can pull off Barry and Flash. I'm not trying to say Ezra Miller is a bad actor, not at all, but he is a bad Flash and Barry Allen.
4thMaster
4thMaster - 11/7/2019, 2:19 PM
This is good, after the last one just felt like set-up for the other 3 this one needs to stand on it's own more. I hope the franchise finds it's footing and ends up being great.
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder