The HIGHLANDER Star Henry Cavill Teases The Amazing Swordplay That Will Be Featured In The Reboot
Related:

The HIGHLANDER Star Henry Cavill Teases The Amazing Swordplay That Will Be Featured In The Reboot

Delroy Lindo And Jack O'Connell Board Ryan Coogler And Michael B. Jordan's Untitled Supernatural Movie
Recommended For You:

Delroy Lindo And Jack O'Connell Board Ryan Coogler And Michael B. Jordan's Untitled Supernatural Movie

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Mashpataters
Mashpataters - 12/4/2013, 5:46 PM
This movie will own. First? never done that before so I'll get it out of the way.
Mashpataters
Mashpataters - 12/4/2013, 5:53 PM
Quit your bitching, but I'm glad you won't be in the theater dragging everybody else down with your negativity.
ajizzle4658
ajizzle4658 - 12/4/2013, 5:56 PM
This movie looks sooo much better than the first one.

Also as Benedict Cumberbatch said at the premiere; "How anyone could have made just two films or one film? One film would have been a travesty. It is so rich. I think what he's extrapolated from the appendix and stuff that Tolkien lead in in separate editions is masterful. Because he did that an order to lure people in to this folklore. This huge world of detail, this wealth of alternative reality that is Middle Earth that gets expanded upon in Lord of The Rings. Having made Lord of The Rings, you can't just come to The Hobbit and just do the bare bones. I think that they are there. It honors the book and it honors everything that's in the book. It just carries it another dimension as well."
Mashpataters
Mashpataters - 12/4/2013, 6:13 PM
I definitely agree. it would be a crime to make just one or even two..I don't see why people complain about it being overlong, if you don't like it you don't have to go see it. But for people who like their films to breathe, this is exactly how it's done.
Mashpataters
Mashpataters - 12/4/2013, 7:13 PM
your statement doesn't make much sense.
HAILHYDRA
HAILHYDRA - 12/4/2013, 9:17 PM
The idea of making three movies out of the Hobbit is very indulgent of the fanboys like us, which is great. But, needless to say, it doesn't go over well with the general audience who sat and watched a 3 hr movie that contains no resolution. This is why critical reviews for the Hobbit were so rough compared to the LOTR trilogy. I'm not complaining. Three movies is great for us, but like I said, bad for everyone else who just wants a sprinkling of Tolkien.
HAILHYDRA
HAILHYDRA - 12/4/2013, 9:19 PM
Also, it comes across as a money grab. Worse than Harry Potter 7.1 and 7.2.
Mashpataters
Mashpataters - 12/4/2013, 10:35 PM
@HAILHYDRA

Yeahh, but aren't most blockbuster movies with big budgets in it to make money? Besides, what defines a money grab?..To me it is a movie or set of movies that consistently cheats the audience out of their money..I never feel cheated by the Hobbit because of its high production values, cast, story etc...A good example would be something like twilight; churning out shits on an assembly line with no care in the world whether it's good or not so long as they make a buck.
Kyos
Kyos - 12/5/2013, 3:38 AM
Well, The Hobbit is one of my favourite books ever since I was a kid, and I don't like how they take elements from other sources or just make something up and stuff it into this to make it three movies.

I wasn't overly fond of the first movie, but I was completely willing to embrace the other two and the trilogy as a whole. For this to happen I had two demands - don't [frick] up characters A and B. So far it looks like A is quite good, but B... damn, no.
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder