I prefer Anck-Su-Namun

Just can't take this seriously with Tom Cruise starring. I don't know why though, so i guess that's my problem. Also using Russel Crowe's Jekyll/Hyde as a 'Fury in the MCU' type fashion to connect the films just seems try-hard and cheesy. This is the same reason DC failed at copying marvel's formula. They lack marvel's patience and focus on character. Iron Man was made to be an Iron Man movie. The prospect of a shared universe was a notion, a hope. This is made specifically to be part of a franchise. They clearly don't have a love for the characters and a creative vision as their motivation. They have a big old dollar sign.

They've got execs and producers piecing together movies before theyve even released their first, and they're gonna end up with a frankenstein's monster of a franchise that's ugly and doesn't belong. I mean dwayne johnson for the wolfman? I [frick]ing love the rock, but that's a superhero movie. I want a monster movie.

This film looks like a flavourless piece of shit. The 90s Mummy was a cheese fest but it was brilliant. Because it was creative, with well done characters, and it was unique and had its own style. And it was made solely for the purpose of making a mummy movie. Not an 8-picture tom cruise franchise. Ugh. Hate where movies are at these days. Everything just feels like a product.

The best thing about the first mummy for me:

Also this may be the 200th show or movie I've seen in which someone uses the line 'there are worse fates than death'. Generic [frick]ing movie.