STAR TREK: Q Returns & Seven Loses Her Borg Implants In First Teaser Trailer For PICARD Season 2

STAR TREK: Q Returns & Seven Loses Her Borg Implants In First Teaser Trailer For PICARD Season 2 STAR TREK: Q Returns & Seven Loses Her Borg Implants In First Teaser Trailer For PICARD Season 2

We recently found out that Star Trek: The Next Generation fave John de Lancie was set to reprise the role of Q for the second season of Picard, and this new teaser trailer gives us a first look...

By MarkCassidy - Jun 16, 2021 10:06 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Trek

Easily the biggest announcement to come out of "First Contact Day" back in April was the imminent return of Q, with John de Lancie set to reprise the role of the near-omnipotent interdimensional being. Now, we have our first look at an older incarnation of the fan-favorite character in a new teaser trailer for the second season of Paramount+'s Picard.

We're not sure how Q will factor into the story, but we hear him welcome his old frenemy to “the very end of the road not taken,” as we see shots of the various returning cast members. Then, right at the end, Seven of Nine waked up to find her Borg implants have been removed.

Check out the promo below and see if you can figure out what's going on!

Introduced during the first season of The Next Generation, Q was initially antagonistic to the crew of the Enterprise before becoming more of an antihero-type and eventual mentor to Picard as the series progressed. He also made several appearances in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Voyager and Lower Decks.

Season 2 of Picard is expected to premiere in 2022. Rejoining Patrick Stewart as the iconic starship captain will be Alison Pill, Isa Briones, Evan Evagora, Michelle Hurd, Santiago Cabrera, Jeri Ryan, Orla Brady and Brent Spiner.

Season 5 Of STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS Will Be Its Last; Jack Quaid Shares Hope That The Show Finds A New Home
Related:

Season 5 Of STAR TREK: LOWER DECKS Will Be Its Last; Jack Quaid Shares Hope That The Show Finds A New Home

Paramount Confirmed A STAR TREK Origin Movie Is Officially In Development At CinemaCon
Recommended For You:

Paramount Confirmed A STAR TREK Origin Movie Is Officially In Development At CinemaCon

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
dracula
dracula - 6/16/2021, 11:03 AM
Too bad the show is such a disapointment.

How about getting Ronald D Moore for a Deep Space 9 revival (best star trek series), there was a plan for another season that would have picked up years later
ElricReturns
ElricReturns - 6/16/2021, 11:04 AM
@dracula - after Discovery I still haven't checked out season 1 of this. I'm worried though. Haven't heard basically anything positive.
IronGenesis
IronGenesis - 6/16/2021, 11:09 AM
Damn he looks slick!
jparr2
jparr2 - 6/16/2021, 11:10 AM
i for one am excited... DeLancie has aged well..
bobevanz
bobevanz - 6/16/2021, 11:16 AM
If you like Discovery and Picard, you're not an OG fan. Season one was absolute garbage. The writers are window lickers and the 65 producers should all be fired. Having said that, I love Q.. [frick] this up and I'm storming Paramount haha. Seriously, fix your trash CBS. Also looking forward to either a Re:View or Mr. PLINKETT episode lol
Mugens
Mugens - 6/16/2021, 11:31 AM
@bobevanz - Thanks for telling us who is and isn't a fan for everyone in the world who has ever watched a Star Trek episode, especially the original series. What B.S.
darkginger
darkginger - 6/16/2021, 12:11 PM
@bobevanz - oh do be quiet.
darkginger
darkginger - 6/16/2021, 12:13 PM
@Mugens - i found the original series to be rubbish, the films on the otherhand are great. Thing i like about Discovery is that the crew arent all "model figures" in terms of physique. Love Tilly.
Mugens
Mugens - 6/16/2021, 12:37 PM
@darkginger - Its strange. I don't know how many times I have read the suggestion that any new Trek show should be way off in the future of the timeline of TNG/DS9/Voyager. Now that Discovery has done just that, people bitch about how bad it is, which it isn't IMHO. (Yeah I love me some Tilly too!) Just can't satisfy everyone I guess.
grendelthing
grendelthing - 6/16/2021, 1:03 PM
@darkginger - I think a lot of that depends on when and how old you were watching TOS. I was a kid in the 70s and absolutely loved it but rewatching now, I can definitely see how younger generations would find it very corny.
darkginger
darkginger - 6/16/2021, 1:46 PM
@grendelthing - my 1st trek was Next Gen. Love Voyager and have been rewatching DSP, Which is fantastic.
I think 1 of the reasons why people dont like Discovery is because its "woke".....which is ironic considering that is exactly what trek has always been about.
jj2112
jj2112 - 6/16/2021, 2:07 PM
@grendelthing - Hmm, I was a kid in the 70s and I think the only good things to come out of the franchise were the films. I'm currently watching all the seasons of TNG for the first time and I'm bored to death. Of course, my love for shows that came after it like Farscape, SG1, BSG and The Expanse doesn't help.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/16/2021, 2:47 PM
@jj2112 - If you like Farscape (*high five to a fellow scaper*), then it is worth sticking with the 90's shows until you get to Deep Space 9. A lot of the Farscape crew cut their teeth on DS9, and the tone is sometimes similar.

I've got a lot of love for TNG and DS9, but they can be a slog. And the ones that aren't good are sometimes unbearable. But the good ones are sometimes quite good, especially once you've spent some time with the characters to develop a real familiarity with them.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/16/2021, 2:54 PM
@bobevanz - To be an "OG fan" of Star Trek, you'd probably have to be in your seventies. And every generation of Star Trek fan comes to the franchise for different reasons, and with different expectations.

Personally, I came to the franchise as an adult after buying into the bullshit Star Wars vs. Star Trek rivalry as a kid (and choosing Star Wars). It's always been an imperfect franchise, but every iteration I've seen has something about it that is worthwhile (and fans that deserve respect for enjoying it).

(Except maybe the Abrams movies, but I don't want to be an asshole trying to gatekeep the franchise, I just don't get the appeal on any level.)
jj2112
jj2112 - 6/16/2021, 3:12 PM
@Spock0Clock - Yeah high five! I'm just itching to be done with TNG to rewatch Farscape. It's been too long. Btw last week I finished rewatching Babylon 5, which I loved at the time, and I feel it's aged terribly. Few shows age gracefully.
madhombre
madhombre - 6/16/2021, 3:29 PM
@darkginger - The original Trek was just an adventure show.
There was nothing “woke” about it.
darkginger
darkginger - 6/16/2021, 5:05 PM
@madhombre - then youve not been paying close attention.
Spock0Clock
Spock0Clock - 6/16/2021, 5:28 PM
@darkginger - It's also true that 60's Trek was much more clearly "woke" by the standards of the 1960's, which are sometimes different than today's standards.

Absolutely Roddenberry was pushing his various agendas against racism, sexism, nationalism, greed, etc. in his own way (as he did in the 80's with TNG), but Roddenberry was also kind of a weird dude with his own eccentricities and there were TV executives meddling and so on.

The spirit of Roddenberry definitely leans toward embracing people's differences and aspiring to be our best selves to make a positive impact on the world, and that cooperation and duty are the ways to achieve that. There are certainly people across the political spectrum who don't line up with those values, but (at this moment in our culture) there are clearly a lot of people of some particular political persuasions who have embraced cynicism and division over the idealism and communitarian spirit of Roddenberry.

But to say "it's just an adventure"... uh... yeah. Agree or disagree, like it or not, Star Trek is preachy as hell.
Eli
Eli - 6/16/2021, 7:56 PM
@madhombre - The original Trek was indeed conceived as a western disguised as sci-fi. As Gene Roddenberry put it," 'Wagon Train' to the stars." But it was about as "woke" as it got for its time, though that term was not in use. The show was literally full of metaphors and dramatic choices that were transparently progressive to anyone alive at the time. Believe it or not, though it might be considered sexist today, even the use of miniskirts for female crew was a "woke" move as, at the time, the miniskirt was a symbol of female empowerment.

The show featured the first interracial kiss on television (Kirk and Uhura.) And that decision was on purpose and was moaned about at the time as being intentionally provocative in the name of "liberalisim." At the time, having a multi-racial bridge crew was seen as intentionally political, much less a bridge officer who was a black female. The use of female writers was also bemoaned, most notably D.C Fontana. Hell, it's routinely argued that the original series may not just have been "woke," but may have been the most "woke" series in the history of television.

You literally could not be more wrong saying that there was nothing "woke" about the original Star Trek.
boogiefett
boogiefett - 6/17/2021, 6:25 AM
@madhombre - aaaaand you haven't been really watching the original Treks - there were plenty of episodes that were "woke" - go back and rewatch (and get back to us) thanks
madhombre
madhombre - 7/3/2021, 1:03 PM
@boogiefett - I’ve watched the Original Trek countless times since I was a kid.
And yes they had little messages but it was never the driving factor in an episode. The first duty was to entertain-usually with action! ( Karate chops, monsters, god like creatures, etc )
Now it’s all naval gazing and hitting you over the head with woke shit.
Let me give you an example, the Kirk/Uhura kiss was just a part of an episode where they kissed and …that was it.
If that episode was made today, it would be hinted at all episode/season long and talked about to death in a preachy way afterwards.
Writers today want to badger you with a “message” before entertaining.
That’s why most Modern shows are awful, especially Nu Treks!
FinnishDude
FinnishDude - 6/16/2021, 11:20 AM
Never thought I would see the day when John de Lancie reprising Q wouldn't get me hyped, but I guess modern Trek has just broken me so badly.
KingLeonidas
KingLeonidas - 6/16/2021, 11:21 AM
Borg implants? Is that a euphemism?

lordmanKnight
lordmanKnight - 6/16/2021, 12:29 PM
@KingLeonidas - YES.
Kyos
Kyos - 6/16/2021, 11:24 AM
Well, despite the undoubtedly flawed first season I liked Picard well enough, so I'm still looking forward to S2.

What I didn't expect was Lower Decks becoming my favourite modern Star Trek show.
lordmanKnight
lordmanKnight - 6/16/2021, 12:35 PM
@Kyos - I personally hate self aware parody humor on serious franchises. I dont need everything to be serious all the time nor do i hate comedy, its just harder for me to suspend disbelief after someones been clowning on how ridiculous things are. A great comedian can even pick apart good movies, Honest Trailers and Pitch Meetings are perfect examples, so i just prefer to keep certain franchises serious. i have no interest in a parody Lord of the Rings Cartoon, or a humorous ER cartoon reboot.
1 2
View Recorder