SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Director Ron Howard Weighs In On The Movie Not Meeting Expectations

SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Director Ron Howard Weighs In On The Movie Not Meeting Expectations SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY Director Ron Howard Weighs In On The Movie Not Meeting Expectations

Ron Howard wasn't faced with an easy task when he was hired to take charge of Solo: A Star Wars Story and now the filmmaker has taken to social media to share his thoughts on its disappointing opening.

By JoshWilding - May 28, 2018 01:05 AM EST
Filed Under: Star Wars
Taking charge of Solo: A Star Wars Story was never going to be an easy feat, especially as original directors Phil Lord and Chris Miller were fired halfway through production and most of what they shot seemingly couldn't be used. Ron Howard did a great job of bringing everything together, though, and so it's a shame his hard work hasn't paid off after the spinoff's dismal opening weekend worldwide.

Now, Howard has taken to Twitter to comment on Solo not living up to expectations and while he's clearly disappointed, he does note that the movie's box office debut still marks a personal best for him.

That's unlikely to be much comfort to Disney and Lucasfilm, however, especially as box office analysts are already predicting that the movie will fail to crack $500 million by the time all is said and done. 

No one seems quite sure what went wrong as of right now but expect this to be talked about for a long time to come because Solo: A Star Wars Story is shaping up to be the first Star Wars flop and that's bound to change how Disney approaches these companion stories moving forward. Thoughts?


STAR WARS: THE PHANTOM MENACE Returns To Theaters And Find Surprise Box Office Success For 25th Anniversary
Related:

STAR WARS: THE PHANTOM MENACE Returns To Theaters And Find Surprise Box Office Success For 25th Anniversary

STAR WARS: DARK EMPIRE's Luke Skywalker And THE PHANTOM MENACE's Darth Maul Get New Hot Toys Figures
Recommended For You:

STAR WARS: DARK EMPIRE's Luke Skywalker And THE PHANTOM MENACE's Darth Maul Get New Hot Toys Figures

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/28/2018, 2:00 AM
Exceeded my expectations as I thought it'd be as bad as TLJ. Hopefully it does well once its box office run is over.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/28/2018, 11:42 AM
@Deodorant - Except for the fact that The Last Jedi wasn't bad. It was actually a very good movie, but the crybabies on this site are upset because it doesn't follow the same predictable Star Wars trilogy mold, "it's like poetry it rhymes."

You babies all had your own little visions for Episode 8 and when none of them came true you just pout and cry just like the whiners who still shout, "George Lucas raped my childhood" regarding the prequels.

Grow up and learn to move forward. You're not always going to get your way.
boiling
boiling - 5/28/2018, 12:45 PM
@411IDSigo - TLJ is a very VERY bad movie doesn‘t matter if Star Wars labeled or not it just is a bad movie. [frick] that „crybabies/childhood rape“ [frick] arguments because it literally is a [frick]ed up movie. There’s no denying mate I‘m sry.
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/28/2018, 1:14 PM
@411IDSigo - Nope I had no vision for what TLJ would be like, it just sucked as a film.
DavidMullich
DavidMullich - 5/28/2018, 4:23 PM
@boiling - How can a movie that received universal acclaim by movie critics and an "A" grade by average moviegoers be considered "VERY bad"? TLJ is simply a movie that you didn't like, and that's fine.
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/28/2018, 4:43 PM
@DavidMullich - IMDB and RT shows audience response which you wouldn't consider A grade, even BO numbers backs those ratings up whether or not they're bots. It made no where near as much as TFA which is the only movie we should compare it to since its part of the main SW saga and not a 'spin off'.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/28/2018, 5:50 PM
@boiling - You invalidated your entire argument and point because you couldn't do it without cursing.

If you can't argue your point intelligently....then you have no point.....mate
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/28/2018, 5:57 PM
@Deodorant - You know what other Star Wars sequel didn't make near as much as the original?.....Empire Strikes Back.

DOMESTIC
Star Wars: $307,263,857
ESB: $209,398,025

Empire made 32% LESS than Star Wars

The Force Awakens: $936,662,225
The Last Jedi: $620,181,382

TLJ made 34% less than TFA

So the drop off between both first and second movies is virtually the same.

Therefore, by your argument Empire Strikes Back was a "VERY bad" movie as well.


A2ron
A2ron - 5/28/2018, 6:30 PM
@DavidMullich - The Last Jedi haters like to go on and on and on about how 'bad' of a film it is. It's so tiring. I personally loved the Last Jedi cause it was different.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/28/2018, 6:50 PM
@A2ron - Exactly!! It broke away from the predictable Star Wars mold.
boiling
boiling - 5/29/2018, 12:33 AM
@DavidMullich - Oh come on I don’t need bought „movie critics“ to tell me that a movie is a masterpiece when it clearly is pure shit. I’d rather make up my own mind but look at the audience score, it seems I am not alone with that. Won’t go into detail there is enough content from dudes who do this better than me on the internet. But ok if you like it, good for you!
boiling
boiling - 5/29/2018, 12:36 AM
@411IDSigo - oh sry that I hurt your feelings .. MATE ..
boiling
boiling - 5/29/2018, 12:38 AM
@A2ron - lol and the pretenders clearly don’t hahaHA
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/29/2018, 2:20 AM
@411IDSigo - While ESB and even ROTJ performed less in the BO than ANH, people still rated them equal to ANH.
Peoples ratings rule over BO in determining how well a movie has been received by the audience, the BO numbers were used just merely to justify the lower response from the audience compared with TFA, as people also claimed bots.
History shows a high profile movie sequel can be subpar (via user ratings) but make more money in the BO, than be good (via user ratings) and make less in the BO. E.g. transformers > ROTF, X2 > X3, Matrix>Revolutions, iron man > Ironman 2 just to name a few

It's ok, you enjoyed TLJ, but majority seem to say its not as good as the previous film, i thought it was bad, with me watching it twice to try and like it but that's my subjective feeling and that's fine. It's like me loving GOTG2 more than GOTG1, While GOTG2 performed abit better than the first, majority of people still rated 1 over 2, you can't win every time, and that's fine. I think you're too worried about others not thinking the same way as you, just remember opinions are like assholes, everyones got one ;)
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 4:43 AM
@boiling - It takes a lot more than that to hurt my feelings mate.

You’re just showing how childish and immature you are.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 5:08 AM
@Deodorant - Your theory sounds nice but they didn’t have “audience ratings” when the original trilogy first came out.
The “audience ratings” back then was called box office.

Even the audience ratings today are not 100% accurate because there are no filters for quality. Any moron can submit an audience review for a movie and that leaves far too much room for biased subjectivity.

Some may hate the movie simply because Luke died. Some may not have liked the flying Princess Leia. But how many audience reviews take into account the full story, structure, character development and cinematography? How many take into account the ENTIRE film? Very few.
And that’s not even including the trolls.

You base your “majority” comment on an RT score but if you consider the far more accurate Cinemascore which polls only people who SAW the movie, The Last Jedi had an A rating. How can that be if, as you say the MAJORITY hated the movie?

And even now, after the release on home video IMBD fan reviewers who are normally more serious film reviewers rate TLH at 7.3 out of 10. That’s a majority of people who liked it once again.

Or perhaps you were referring to the babies on this site as your alleged “majority”. This site is filled with lemming children who want to think like everyone else to feel included or important.
And those who dare speak logic or oppose the views of the fraternity of regulars are often shouted down or attacked.

Either way it seems as if your conclusion is wrong. Your “majorities” are based on skewed data.

Unlike you I dont care who thinks like me, but I do like to point out where people are wrong and why. In the case of this site it’s because most of the TLJ haters are babies who didn’t get their way. I’m sure they would have preferred the same old tired “It’s poetry it rhymes” plot.
And since this took the franchise in a fresh direction...now they are whining. That or they just want to fit in so they areliked by their peers on this site.

That being said....on all points....you are wrong.
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/29/2018, 7:31 AM
@411IDSigo -
Wrong. Cinemascore ratings have fewer numbers and is in the USA ONLY, thus itself is far from your claims of "far more accurate", cus the whole world doesn't matter right?. IMDB and RT are global scores, the majority.

Right. Regarding home viewers being more serious than film goers, which really rules out your cinemascore above. While 7.3 on IMDB is decent, my claims of the majority is in comparison to TFA, you will notice how I always compare it to TFA, and while I personally found the film to be bad, I never claimed the majority also find it bad, just that they didn't resonate with it as well as TFA.
Home viewers may also explain why ESB and ROTJ have very similar ratings to ANH yet performed lower in the BO. I wasn't around at the time of the release so context might have got something to do with the performance. Similar examples of context helping BO performance: Black Panther and wonder woman.

Wrong. If you didn't care you wouldn't have aimed your first comment on just a specific part of my opinion (my OP). And then bringing in the hard guns of childish name calling e.g. 'crybabies'. How exactly can you point out that someones opinion is wrong?. If you're referring to my third post with the BO numbers, that was used nothing more than to backup audience ratings (RT and IMDB), as stated previously and i stand by it, audience ratings rule over BO performance.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 8:00 AM
@Deodorant - Audience ratings Are much easier to dole out. Everybody has an opinion. But people won’t spend their money on a bad film. Yet worldwide TLJ earned $1.33 Billion.
That had to come from repeat viewings of the movie as well. And even AFTER your alleged negative fan reviews of the movie the box office continued to grow.
So your theory, your opinion that the majority of people did not like the movie does not hold water.

I was around for the original release of the original trilogy so I can speak from experience. ESB was darker and a bit more off putting but the lines were around the block and continually sold out as it was for ROTJ.
But at that time ESB was in maybe one cinema while ROTJ was in a few cinemas when multi-plexes came to fruition.

Either way people still waited hours for tickets and spent their money, which was far less then than tickets are today. In addition the movies were out for a year at times and rereleased in theaters before release on home video.

I call people crybabies because the shoe fits. They whine and complain endlessly because TLJ didn’t line up with their fan fiction or You Tube theories.
So now they throw endless tantrums and make up statistics or make assumptions like you are doing no matter how incorrect they are.

Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/29/2018, 1:24 PM
@411IDSigo - Again you take things out of context, my claims regarding audience feedback is and has always been in comparison to TFA, which took in over $2billion. So yes my theory of the film not resonating as well as TFA to the majority of people does in fact hold up based on BO numbers alone., are you not reading my posts properly or are you reading what you want to read?
If ESB was darker then explains the lower BO office, though regarding your experience, that unfortunately doesn't hold water in the great context of things as thats your experience and area alone. Both times i watched TLJ the cinemas was also close to packed, felt more than tie times I watched TFA, yet TFA made more in its run.
So no, i ain't cry babying and I aint making up statistics out of my rear.
boiling
boiling - 5/29/2018, 1:24 PM
@411IDSigo - ouch that really got me and I thought we were mates mate?!

VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 3:14 PM
@Deodorant - And you take it back to my original point. Since the box office numbers were lower for TLJ than for TFA and you say it is because the audience was not happy with the movie or did not like the movie..... then your theory must apply to Empire Strikes Back and by your definition THAT too should be considered a terrible movie.

So let's confirm for the record, as I stated previously, that YOU think that The Empire Strikes Back is a terrible movie based simply on its box office underperforming the original Star Wars.

And since Return of the Jedi made $252,583,617 which is nearly $50 Million more than ESB, that would mean ROTJ was more fan preferred than ESB and therefore the better movie.

Star Wars: $307,263,857
ESB: $209,398,025
ROTJ: $252,583,617

Glad we have all of that sorted out. Got it.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 3:16 PM
@boiling - Ahh gifs. The last resort for an immature child who can't win an argument.

Bye bye cupcake.
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/29/2018, 4:40 PM
@411IDSigo - And you take it back to what I've said previously, I always compared it to TLJ. TFA was indeed not welcomed by the majority of people in COMPARISON to TFA, not terrible, but not at THE SAME LEVEL as TFA. When I claim a film to be bad, that is my personal opinion not the overall audience which I've never claimed or mentioned anywhere above. Hopefully we've cleared that up.
It's clear you're not reading or fully understanding the point I am making. BO performance alone is a horrible way in deciding how well audience find a movie. As I previously mentioned, audience ratings rule over BO performance alone. Re: ESB I loved that film, probably found it the best, and audience ratings show that. Sure BO performance showed people at the time did not welcome it in COMPARISON to ANH, and I never believed you should base a film based off BO performance alone as I've said multiple times, but you even said it was darker, the overall context might have been a reason for that. As you also said home viewers are more serious in their rating schemes, this has pushed ESB and ROTJ rating to same levels as ANH on IMDB and RT. Glad thats been cleared that up, or are you gonna try throw words in my mouth again eh?
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 6:12 PM
@Deodorant -
5/29/18, 4:$0 PM - "When I claim a film to be bad, that is my personal opinion not the overall audience which I've never claimed or mentioned anywhere above."

5/29/2018, 2:20 AM - "It's ok, you enjoyed TLJ, but majority seem to say its not as good as the previous film."

You can't even keep your own argument straight.

And you keep moving the goalpost.
So you want to invalidate ANY rating because it doesn't agree with your beloved Rotten Tomatoes score.

Cinemascore in which the audience gave it an "A":
"Cinemascore ratings have fewer numbers and is in the USA ONLY, thus itself is far from your claims of "far more accurate", cus the whole world doesn't matter right?"

IMDB viewers give it a 7.3/10 and you now say, "home viewers are more serious in their rating schemes, this has pushed ESB and ROTJ rating to same levels as ANH on IMDB and RT." Then you try to claim that I made that comment...which I did not.

So two out of three audience surveys show that TLJ was not horrible even though you said the "MAJORITY" said it was not as good.
But you want to discredit the two that disagree with your RT score which does not require people actually SEE the movie before reviewing it.

Your argument does not hold water. You can't even keep your own points straight.

You really are just wasting my time at this point.
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/29/2018, 9:09 PM
@411IDSigo - Nope now you're the one that's placing words in my mouth. How does my quote of "the majority seem to say its not as good as the previous film" imply that the audience found it bad or terrible?

I invalidated Cinemascore ONLY because you claimed it to be "far more accurate". Cinemascore does NOT take into account all other countries. You're too busy thinking the USA IS the entire world!
I never even claimed you made that comment, the only comment you made was "And even now, after the release on home video IMBD fan reviewers who are normally more serious film reviewers rate TLH at 7.3 out of 10" have you forgotten what you said?
Again i never claimed the majority of the audeince found it "terrible" as you constantly seem to shove down my throat. I've always used RT AND IMDB rating. Re-read my posts, you keep implying im only using RT as my main score. I've ALWAYS used RT and IMDB. Cinemascore being such low numbers is a horrible rating scheme which is USA only!
Stop wasting my time, you need to learn how to read.
I found TLJ a bad film, id rate it 6/10 tops. But NEVER have i said the AUDEINCE found the film bad, only that it was "NOT AS GOOD" as TFA, that does not imply the audience found it bad or terrible. Take that as you will mate, but unfortunately you're reading my posts in a totally different way, and making assumptions as to what im 'supposedly' saying!
boiling
boiling - 5/30/2018, 4:06 AM
@411IDSigo - Naaw no byebye, I can go on forever dumpling! You like gifs, look here I found one of yourself
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/30/2018, 5:01 AM
@Deodorant - What part of “you’re wasting my time”’ did you not understand?
Deodorant
Deodorant - 5/30/2018, 2:13 PM
@411IDSigo - Obviously the part of ALL my posts which you understood...... none of it! Adios!
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/30/2018, 3:51 PM
@Deodorant - Oh I understood you, but all of your theories and arguments are wrong and I spelled that out quite clearly. You just can't handle that.

And since you can't learn...you are wasting my time.
I'm done with you now.
bcom
bcom - 5/28/2018, 2:01 AM
Personally, I think Ron did a fantastic job on this film considering how late he was brought in. I really enjoyed this film.
boiling
boiling - 5/29/2018, 12:42 AM
@bcom - WORD
DeadClunge
DeadClunge - 5/28/2018, 2:03 AM
I didnt hate TLJ...but solo left me excited for a sequel and TLJ didn't.
AwesomePromoz
AwesomePromoz - 5/28/2018, 3:01 AM
@ClungePool - Really? I'm very intrigued to see how they wrap up the main trilogy? Kylo is the main man now, and I want to see what his tyranny has wrought on the galaxy.
DeadClunge
DeadClunge - 5/28/2018, 4:07 AM
@TheFamousJMC - i just never got kylo...he just seems like a brat to me and his halfway evil nature just seems quite annoying. I feel like they're just retreading vaders story line and kylo will eventually redeem himself just before he dies (like vader did).
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/28/2018, 8:11 PM
@ClungePool - And so many others like you thought you knew was going to happen in E8....and you were all wrong and now are upset.
E8 was FAR from predictable which one of the things that made it so great.
DeadClunge
DeadClunge - 5/28/2018, 11:48 PM
@411IDSigo - you shouldn't assume.....I'm not one of the people who hate TLJ and i didnt make any fan theories because i like to see where the writers and director take the story.....i just dont like emo ren the big brat.
VictorKrueger
VictorKrueger - 5/29/2018, 4:40 AM
@ClungePool - Then I’m assuming you hated The Force Awakens as well?
DeadClunge
DeadClunge - 5/29/2018, 6:21 AM
@411IDSigo - lol i didn't hate either of them, i just feel kylo is a bit of a brat..but that isn't enough to ruin the film for me.
1 2 3 4
View Recorder