WONDER WOMAN 1984 Director Patty Jenkins Comments On "Body Swap" Backlash - SPOILERS

WONDER WOMAN 1984 Director Patty Jenkins Comments On "Body Swap" Backlash - SPOILERS WONDER WOMAN 1984 Director Patty Jenkins Comments On "Body Swap" Backlash - SPOILERS

One of the more controversial aspects of Wonder Woman 1984 was the "body swap", and director Patty Jenkins has now responded to a fan's Tweet, seemingly laughing off one highly problematic plot point...

By MarkCassidy - Jan 02, 2021 09:01 AM EST
Filed Under: Wonder Woman 1984

Wonder Woman 1984 has proved to be divisive for a number of reasons, but one plot point, in particular, has come in for quite a lot of backlash.

In the DC Comics sequel, Diana (Gal Gadot) uses a magic wish stone to will her deceased lover Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) back to life in the body of some random dude (Kristoffer Polaha). The two then have sex, and... well, you can see why this might be viewed as more than a little problematic!

A fan Tweeted a (pretty lame) defence of the body swap to director Patty Jenkins, which suggests that it doesn't really matter that Diana sleeps with Steve while he's in the body of, let's say, an oblivious and unwilling participant, because it all gets erased when she takes back her wish.

Jenkins' response is not exactly in-depth, but she does seem to agree.

Some feel too much has been made of this and that many people are blowing it out of proportion, but whatever side of the debate you happen to land on, it is difficult to fathom why Jenkins and co. felt the need to go all Quantum Leap with Trevor's return and not simply reintroduce the character.

What to you make of WW84's controversial body swap and Jenkins' response? Drop us a comment down below.

WW84 Director On Sequel's Third Anniversary: I Love That You Are Thinking Of It As A Christmas Movie Now
Related:

WW84 Director On Sequel's Third Anniversary: "I Love That You Are Thinking Of It As A Christmas Movie Now"

Gal Gadot Is Expected To Appear As WONDER WOMAN In Several Upcoming DC Comics Movies
Recommended For You:

Gal Gadot Is Expected To Appear As WONDER WOMAN In Several Upcoming DC Comics Movies

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 1/2/2021, 9:02 AM
He was literally Steve Trevor when that happened. The other dude's soul didn't even exist at the time.
InfinitePunches
InfinitePunches - 1/2/2021, 9:03 AM
, Your Honor.
Rosraf
Rosraf - 1/2/2021, 9:24 AM
@InfinitePunches - So he was lacking consciousness and has no memory of it, you say?
aresww3
aresww3 - 1/2/2021, 9:04 AM
anyone complaing about this has too much time on their hand.




Rosraf
Rosraf - 1/2/2021, 9:11 AM
@aresww3 - It's a fair criticism because Diana is portrayed as a deeply moral, ethical standard bearer. Yet she seemingly never spends 2 seconds thinking about the moral and ethical implications of Steve inhabiting another person's body (and yes, having sex with it). Seems like Diana has quite the moral/ethical blindspots.
aresww3
aresww3 - 1/2/2021, 9:27 AM
@Rosraf - So you think that's what this movie needed. Diana philosophizing about whether she just raped a fictional character, who is more of a prop than a 3 dimensional fleshed out person? You think that would have helped an already bloated movie?

The fact as I've mentioned is this cannot happen in real life, so really Diana isn't setting any kind of example for reality. This could never happen in real life, so judging it from the POV of world where such things can't happen is difficult or even impossible to do. It goes into unnecessary metaphysical arguments of who owns our body? Whoevers mind inhabits a body could be argued is the owner and only sensible owner of the body. Also the experience of rape is only unpleasant in so far as we experience the violation of our body. We suffer long term trauma. Our bodies aren't independently conscious, so without our mind, there really is no violation of our person. It's like saying if I owned a car, then someone else now owns and uses it in away I don't approve of, I can't claim its still mine, so they can only drive it the way I want them to.

The man was Steve. The body belonged to Steve so long as Steve inhabited it.

Also, this is clear a tactic for those who hated the movie even before it came out (those who were claiming it was an attack on Trump. Pure BS) when that criticism wouldn't hold, because clearly Max Lord wasn't, they then had to attack the film some other way. Its muchado about nothing.
aresww3
aresww3 - 1/2/2021, 9:30 AM
@Rosraf - also, diana did show concern. she said to steve while they were in bed, we need to find out why you're inhabiting the body.
Rosraf
Rosraf - 1/2/2021, 9:41 AM
@aresww3 - What I think is more interesting than the sex part is that Diana didn't seemed concerned that another person lost their existence so that Steve could baby huey around in 1984, and she didn't seem to consider rescinding her wish until she started noticeably losing her own powers. -What was her original plan? -Keep Steve around and have the other guy lose his existence forever?
aresww3
aresww3 - 1/2/2021, 9:59 AM
@Rosraf - she was supposed to be being selfish. that was the point. I don't think in the first half of the movie she even knew what was happening. She was discovering what was going on. Then by the time she discovered what was going on she was blinded by love, so she probably couldn't even consider that at that moment. The scene where clearly she says we have to find out why you're in someone else's body, was her showing concern and the fact she gave up Steve, was not just to get her powers back and save the world. It was for everything including getting the mans life back. But at the time clearly the more pressing issue was not a singular mans life, but what Max was doing with this powerful artifact that could destroy the world. I mean realistically how would they have even discussed that? There was one scene when before the Whitehouse where she realized she could renounce her wish. Then after the whitehouse scene, she sees the full consequences of what can happen and learns her lesson.

If there was anything at all I liked about the movie it was them showing that Diana caught in a morally impossible situation can be imperfect and do the wrong thing. It made her human and vulnerable. Again, the whole point of bringing Steve back was to show her weakness and vulnerability, while not compromising her overall nobility. That was the same theme as her cheating in the beginning of the film. She was a noble girl who wanted to win and be the best warrior so much that she took a short cut. Yet ultimately she learns her lesson when she came out of the other side and became a better warrior or hero for finally recognizing the TRUTH.

Honestly the film could have executed it better, but it was beautifully performed by the little girl and Gal Gadot. I especially like that Gal pulled the same face as the little girl after she lost the race (lilly aspel I believe) when she realized she'd have to give up Steve in the Whitehouse. I won't commend Gal for much in WW84 but the scene where Cheetah asked Diana "what do you have to give up?" And it dawned on Diana how wrong what everything she was doing was, was incredibly well done. I wondered where this Gal Gadot was the whole rest of the movie.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ...
View Recorder