Who exactly owns Deadpool's film rights may become the next big "wait, what?!" moment in the ongoing hell of piecing together what Marvel's brass were doing in Hollywood for the last six decades.

@dracula - As long as Marvel can keep making solo Spidey films then I'm okay with it. It seems like the Marvel films will be utilizing less popular villains (Vulture and Mysterio for instance) and I think that's actually very cool. It keeps it fresh. I would be lying if I said I don't want Norman Osbourne and a proper Green Goblin in the MCU though. He could set up a big storyline with Dark Avengers....

Hulk and Namor can stay they way they are in my opinion. I've never been much of a Hulk fan. His solo comics can only do so much, mostly dealing with his dual personality and being on the run from the military. I think they have done a fine job of telling stories with him in other characters' films.

Namor. He's similar. I like him. But he's also a gigantic dick head in the comics. And to be honest, his solo comics have never been that great or interesting. He's also best used as either an ally to the FF and X-Men, or as a villain. The perfect way to use him would be to introduce him in a film that has him bringing Atlantis to the surface to battle a strong world power. That makes Black Panther and Wakanda a perfect target. I say introduce him in a Black Panther film. Have a war between Atlantis and Wakanda. Then maybe bring him into other big Infinity War-lkke stories. But he usually keeps to himself in Atlantis. He may have strong ties with the FF, but only so many films can be made. The FF have so many more characters/villains that we have been dying to see in the MCU that a Namor-centric FF film seems like a waste. Plus, any solo Namor film would come off as an Aquaman RIP off, even though Namor was created before Aquaman...

@Battabing - Sony owns film and animation, marvel owns toys for spidey.

@Doomsday8888 - And Josh be like

@Pantherpool - Man Chadwick Boseman is never hyped lol