Chris Pine Talks STAR TREK 2 Anticipation, Filming With IMAX And More

The actor behind Capt. James T. Kirk in J.J. Abrams's Star Trek discusses the upcoming sequel, the pressure caused by its high anticipation, filming with "big and loud" IMAX Cameras and more.

Follow Paul:
By Paul Romano - 6/17/2012


Talking with Collider while promoting his new movie People Like Us, Chris Pine talks about the highly anticipated sequel to J.J. Abrams' Star Trek. He discusses the pressure that the cast feels since the sequel's anticipation is so high, while also dishing on Abrams mashing a character driven story with plenty of action. Pine also shares his thoughts on filming with IMAX cameras (it was recently confirmed that the film will be released in IMAX 3D, and that key scenes were shot in IMAX).

On Having Big Action In A Character Driven Story:
Those big films are scary things. There’s so much money behind those things. There’s that hype. You enter a machine. I’m just happy that the people behind it were such good, welcoming types. J.J. [Abrams] runs that ship. J.J. is a wonderful guy. What they bring to this kind of film is a small character-driven story, matched with robots or aliens or spaceships. That’s a very hard thing to do, and a lot of people don’t pay attention to that. It’s really interesting that, in The Avengers, the character that people relate to is The Hulk, and I think the reason why they relate to The Hulk is because he’s fragile and human and fault



On The Pressure From Star Trek 2's High Anticipation:
Generally speaking, the more money that’s involved in anything, the more people are expecting and hoping that it’s not going to fail. If you’re a part of that process of whether it’s going to fail or succeed, you’re only human and you hope that it does well. But, there’s only so much, as an actor, that you can do. People are either going to respond to it or not, and I would drive myself crazy if I tried to control it anymore than that, other than a really fervent desire that people come and watch it and like it. We at least tried to do a really good job. Critics think we try to make bad films. They think we want to spend five months of our lives making something bad. We always go out with the best of intentions, whether it’s fluffy comedy or a drama. It’s always in the effort of, “Please come, like it, enjoy it, take something away!”


On Filming With "Loud" IMAX Cameras:
They are big cameras. They are big, loud cameras! And the things take forever to reload. It’s literally 20 minutes to reload a camera. I think the first thing that I saw on IMAX was The Avengers. The scope and the size of it are pretty neat, I will say that. I think J.J. did a good job of knowing which scenes to marry with the IMAX and which scenes would really pop, like they did with Mission Impossible. When Tom [Cruise] is on that huge building, it made all the sense in the world to do it in IMAX.

With J.J. and company – Alex, Bob and Damon included – what they’re really, really good at and what sets them apart is that they know how to do the action, and they know that if you don’t give them the small character-driven drama, you can blow up anything you want and no one cares. People will leave the theater because we’ve all seen it, a million ways. With the second one, people will find that it’s the mythic structure, done really well. The character journeys are just perfect mythic structures. They do it so well. The journeys with the characters will be really great, and the explosions and set pieces are going to knock people out of their seats.


The currently untitled Star Trek sequel (which also stars Zachary Quinto, Benedict Cumberbatch, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, Simon Pegg and Alice Eve) is set to hit theaters May 17th, 2013.









Source: Collider
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
2
LIKE!
33 Comments
95 - 6/17/2012, 11:48 AM
I doubt this sequel will fail. Glad they didn't rush to make this. And I don't think Pine is too knowledgable on IMAX technology.
AlanWarlock - 6/17/2012, 11:50 AM
Right. Because, after all, he hasn't been in a movie filmed in IMAX.
cmay13 - 6/17/2012, 11:51 AM
he never saw the dark knight on imax? Or MI4?
InfiniteMonkey - 6/17/2012, 11:59 AM
Glad he thinks that way and we appreciate the effort but seriously, this one took so long to bloody make. Opening hour can't get here fast enough.
95 - 6/17/2012, 12:09 PM
So, Chris missed Ghost Protocol in IMAX? For a guy working with the read deal, you would of thought his first IMAX experience is one actually filmed in IMAX, not a DMR (The Avengers).
NOLANITE - 6/17/2012, 12:18 PM
I think he's bluffing.
He saw MI4. he's trying to
Get whedon happy.

The avengers has no IMAX footage!
Hudson3D - 6/17/2012, 12:21 PM
@3D.. I wouldn't worry to much about Pines knowledge of IMAX.. I don't think he is directing it...
jj2112 - 6/17/2012, 12:25 PM
"They know that if you don’t give them the small character-driven drama, you can blow up anything you want and no one cares"... Yeah, just like Prometheus, Damon Lindelof did a great job with it and the piss-poor characters.
GingerBird - 6/17/2012, 12:32 PM
Ya this dude needs a little history lesson on The Dark Knight/TDKR
GingerBird - 6/17/2012, 12:35 PM
And I really liked the first Abrams Star Trek, but I didn't love it and I didn't think it was that big of a smash to make this sequel have "super crazy high anticipation"...
Hudson3D - 6/17/2012, 12:43 PM
@GingerBird.. Compared to the previous Star Trek film, Nemisis, the 2009 film one was awesome. And I have been a fan of Next Gen since the 80's. I wasn't looking forward to the reboot after seeing the series Star trek Enterprise fail as I didn't think going backwards was a good idea.

To me, a new series should have moved even further into the future. But I was sold after the movie with Pine..

And I know the sequel will be better...
TheBigBoss917 - 6/17/2012, 12:47 PM
I think they'll be fine, didnt the first one have crazy anticipation being a reboot and all? Loved the first one and i cant wait for the sequel.
RobJigga - 6/17/2012, 12:49 PM
KHAN!!!!!!
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:00 PM
@Hudson3D @AlanWarlock

Referencing a DMR is irrelevant. That's it, that's my point. Sad you two couldn't understand.
Ranger14 - 6/17/2012, 1:08 PM
The thing is, and this was my point that some didn't figure out on another article, most people go to IMAX for an overall better and more grand viewing experience. I really don't think the average film-goer pays that much attention to how the actual IMAX film is filmed, as the experience is better than watching it in a normal theater regardless. I could be wrong, but most people I know don't have a clue what DMR or being filmed in IMAX is. They just want to see the film on a bigger screen.
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:14 PM
@Ranger14

Yeah, and my point was: people will know the difference soon enough. Studios are using this as a niche market.
Fabius - 6/17/2012, 1:15 PM
He was just OK in the first movie, Quinto and Hemsworth were very better ! just my feeling. Ryan Gosling should be A better choice.
Ranger14 - 6/17/2012, 1:16 PM
3D@ Some will know and some will care. I think you are right in saying that is a niche market. Your average housewife taking her kids to a movie isn't going to care. Geeks like we are may. :-P
Hudson3D - 6/17/2012, 1:33 PM
@3d, and my point is, he isn't directing it...
so what does it matter what his comments are about the way it is being filmed.
The truth is, you are just nitpicking because he mentioned avengers!
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:37 PM
@Hudson3D

What's the point of stating your first IMAX movie as a DMR? Should of just stuck with the MI4 comparison. From the same studio and distributor. Anyway, he must be mistaken, I'm sure JJ screened MI4 in IMAX to the cast before production. My point was simple and not worth this back-and-forth.
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:42 PM
@Hudson3D

Oh, so you're just mad because you think I'm criticizing The Avengers. I have no problem with DMRs or post-converted 3D. Marvel does it best. All that matters is Chris Pine's performance in front of the camera. But this is interview is as bad as Michael Bay turning to James Cameron to find out the name of the camera he filmed TF3 with.
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:43 PM
@IM53

He would be a good Nova.
And Cumberpatch would be a good Dr. Strange.
darkmetal - 6/17/2012, 1:48 PM
The Kirk character wasn't written very well in the reboot. Kirk shouldve had a harder road to the Captains seat.
It came across as a Trek universe with lower standards the the original Trek universe. They took bits of info about Kirks past and misused it. Kirk said in Trek 2 he altered the test so he could win. This guy altered it to win.
This Kirk never had to prove he was worthy of Starfleet or command. He broke rules but was supposed to be the cool rebel guy. When he did accomplish something it was the always the hard way and usually just some physical feat.
The character was written in a way that he was presumed so great and Starfleet was so lucky to get him, he has his own set of rules.
A writer can control a story and have things work out in the end and give the idea that such a character is a cool badass. When in reality, he wouldn't get far with that attitude, unless his Dad was his boss.
Pine fits the part of the not so smart, unruly guy who's hung up on himself. But when hes made Captain he makes a Captain look like a joke.
Pine is the new Casper Van Dien.
95 - 6/17/2012, 1:57 PM
@darkmetal

I agree to some degree, because I liked this Kirk. Mainly because Abrams' directing saved this from being a dumb blockbuster with fun characters, all-too convenient situations, and rushed character development pacing.
BooYah - 6/17/2012, 2:27 PM
Cant wait for the sequel. The first one awesome.
preacher - 6/17/2012, 3:17 PM
Jesus, really? This was a REBOOT. It's not supposed to be JUST LIKE the original. And, correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not a Trekkie so I apologize beforehand with this question if I sound idiotic, but did the originals (tv series included) show Kirk's time in the Academy? If not, then who's to say HOW he behaved before he became Captain?

I for one enjoyed this very much! I did grow up with the tv series (as the came out, not reruns) and enjoyed the films. I wasn't a fan of Pickard's Star Trek but to each his own. Anyways, Pine's Kirk, as I watch it and with subsequent viewings, really does remind me of Shatner's. Different mannerisms, ect.

If anything, I felt that Spock's backstory, his anger and all of that (he's pretty damn vicious. definitely a candidate for anger management!) was the most tinkered with.

Let it begin....
darkmetal - 6/17/2012, 3:21 PM
@3D It wasn't a crappy movie and it was nice to see non green screen sets. But the role of the Captain is pivotal.
Ive worked jobs where promotions were much harder to come by.
A Captain needs to know quite a bit about the ship and its positions and should serve under a Captain as 1st officer and be schooled by that Captain.
Also you have the back biting and the people who get pissed when one is promoted. And it would be made worse in that situation.
To expect people to follow him, they can't just say "Hes your Captain like it or not." They have to know he will be capable to act in various situations and that the crew sees that.
Being that a writer is in control, it will somehow workout. But in reality he would be set up for failure.
Durf - 6/17/2012, 3:42 PM
Really enjoyed the first movie, so definitely looking forward to the second!

@IM53: I'm with you, more of a SW guy, but still loved this movie.

Also, agree on Pine for Nova!
95 - 6/17/2012, 4:03 PM
@darkmetal

I didn't say it was a "crappy movie". Orci and Kurtzman write dumbed-down blockbusters— and JJ directed this one into smart and epic territory. And now I'm misunderstanding your point about Kirk being Captain so easily(?).
theomegasanction - 6/17/2012, 4:57 PM
thought the first movie was a great reboot. only two things i would have changed: kirk chased by animals on ice planet reminded me of the phantom menace underwater chase scene and the transporting onto the enterprise and scotty getting stuck in the water tube, seemed unnecessary and childish. minor choices aside it was overall a great movie and think
timotey - 6/18/2012, 1:41 AM
What's with all the Chris Pine bashing? So he mentioned The Avengers and not TDK! But he actually saw it and MI4, be it in IMAX or not. How many actors can actually say that? See Patrick Stewart and his comments on XMFC, he couldn't even be bothered to go and see the movie that featured his own character as a young guy!

Also, Chris Pine is NOT obligated to like Nolan's Batman and swoon about it. TDK is not a golden idol that everybody needs to bow to. I'm not saying he does NOT like it, just that you're overreacting, people.
ralfinader - 6/18/2012, 4:52 AM
Looking forward to ST2, the Star Trek reboot was a damn fun movie, and ranks so much higher on my list than the Star Wars prequels (which sucked, overall). Chris Pine was an inspired choice to play Kirk, and I liked his responses above.
wildbillyb - 6/18/2012, 5:22 AM
I thought Pine fit in nicely with the Kirk mythology. He was always the guy who gets the girl and punches the bad guy, while possibly giving the finger to the Man. I definitely left the first movie wanting to see what this whole crew would be up to next. Can't wait for ST2.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.