I wonder how many hours are left until another Millar-related article pops up.

Mark Millar please stop talking your full of shit.

in Singer we trust.

Well he is right about some of the things that went wrong in those X-Men movies. I agree, I think X2 is a great movie(I'm actually surprised people put FC over X2 but hey..)

Mark Miller sure has been doing a lot of talking lately. For his sake, The Wolverine better be a masterpiece...

Will it have Sentinels?? Will the costumes look good? I hope so. Here are a few things I want to see in the x-Men films.
1. Sentinels
2. Apocalypse
3. Mr. Sinister & Archangel
4. Omega Red
5. The Brood

@KamenRiderJ22 Exactly!

I thought the same thing about Blade lol.

Damn I miss Blade, we need a new one and a new DD but I don't know how the hell that's gonna turn out with Disney/Marvel, there gonna end up a PG-13.

Well i'm glad about that now bring on Marvel Knights.

Disney has CONTROL of Marvel.

1) Days of Future Past is synonymous with Sentinels, just as God Loves, Man Kills is with Stryker, the Dark Phoenix Saga is with Jean. You will get them in some form, I am certain.

2) If you had Sentinels from the very beginning, things would get confused. Why are there giant hunter-killers abducting/killing mutants in modern America? What kind of government would approve that? Sentinels represent a holocaust. You need a set-up for that, and if you began with Days of Future Past, then the future franchise would find ways to call back and use elements of that plot, just as they have with Stryker. Can't start off with time travel. Star Trek did it by accident, not design, and it wasn't exactly new to the series in 2009, now, was it?

3) Millar has some great points here that we seem to be ignoring out of spite.

a) X-Men DID rejuvenate CBMs after the 90s. Blade was an R-rated super-violent bloody action/horror flick, and I'm going to be so bold as to say that Blade was and still is an obscure character in comics. What has Blade been doing lately? Who knew about Blade before Wesley Snipes? Maybe those who saw the Spider-man cartoon, but apart from that, he's just as obscure as Captain Britain... more so, actually.

b) Singer may not be on my list of favorites, but even I give credit where it is due. He essentially made a Star Trek movie (he's a big trekkie) with the same number of characters that would appear in an episode, and sold it to audiences consisting of fans, non-fans, and casual comic book browsers. An ensemble of characters who had been changed over and over again for a decade by two handfuls of writers, and not only introduced them, but made them (mostly) relevant.

c) Singer has spoiled us. Again, still not his number one fan, especially after Superman Returns, but let's face it - every fan felt they were entitled to have what they wanted, because he was competent enough to bring not just one, but at least a dozen Marvel characters to the big screen in one sitting. We all wanted more, and we got more. And more. Just remember that originally, there were only five (or six) X-Men suited up in the first movie.

WYLEEJAY@ If they reboot via time travel then it just means they have to diverge from the timestream before the Emma Frost in First Class is born. That way, any charcter can be born earlier than they usually would. Within reason.

blade didn't do shit 99% of GA didn't even know blade was a comic book movie

Tainted@ You're so right. That is exactly what I couldn't be assed to say. Props.

Could Alexander, Del Toro and Miller disappear for 2 weeks please!

Just give me CYCLOPS or any other Summers, you Scottish prick!

I mean Millar's going on about not trying to do too much, up there? Well, doing X-Men 4 and X-Men - First Class 2 in one movie is too much in my opinion.