Green Lantern: Emerald Knights Review (Spoiler Free)

Does the movie breathe new life into DC's animation front or does is it more of the same old same old?

Follow Mark:
By Mark Julian - 6/8/2011



Thank's to my cable subscription, I was able to see Green Lantern: Emerald Knights a day early. I must admit, I had some reservations based on DC's earlier forays into animation (cough...cough....Superman:Doomsday)but I decided to roll the dice and give this a shot. Let me get straight to the point. This film will probably beat your expectations but it still missed some opportunities to be truly special.







If you're a Hal Jordan lover, you may be a little miffed as he isn't really the main focus of the story. Instead, Hal is the narrator, retelling historical events of the Core's past to a new recruit and does so with the back-drop of an impending galactic catastrophe on the horizon. If your familiar with the Core then these stories aren't all that new to you and some of the slight tweaks will probably irk you a little; however, if you are new to the mythos these stories will be very informative and can serve as a prep for the upcoming movie. Now to the action.


The story starts out with a big bang that gets you excited but then sort of loses steam as we go into story-telling mode.I would say these scenes are akin to 2008's Batman: Gotham Knight but lack that film's cohesion. In the side-stories, we get the tales of the First Lantern, Kilowog's first battle, Laira's first solo mission, Mogo vs Balfunga, and lastly an Abin Sur tale.There are tons of easter eggs in the 5 tales that will cause hardcore fans to geek out and really makes the movie purchase worth it.

Now for the bad. The voice attacking really suffers at times. Henry Rollins often plays tough guys on screen but as Kilowog he sounds like a pubescent Disney mouseketeer (I'm exaggerating but he was that bad). However, Fillion is great as Hal and Elisabeth Moss (Mad Men) is spot on as Arisia. The animation is really top-knotch but we are treated to the Jon Stewart JLU approach of firing light rays and not actually building constructs. Speaking of Jon, can a brother get some spotlight. Or Guy or Kyle, or heck even Alan Scott. My last drawback is that this film is stand-alone and is in no way connected to Green Lantern: First Flight. Seeing as how Hal is schooling a rookie, seems like it would have made more sense to have the two films be connected.




Overall, the film is good not great. Watch it for the easter eggs and cameos of lesser DC figures not for a great story. I would give it 3.5 stars out of 5.

Enjoy the Stills!



























DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
1
LIKE!
6 Comments
sonofsamadams - 6/8/2011, 2:30 PM
He didn't like Kilo's voice, eh?

Oh well, good review. I kinda want to see this movie. It looks better than first flight.
Gattsu - 6/8/2011, 8:51 PM
Great review, yeah Graphic your pretty much on point with this one. I would have given it at least a 4 out of five, but I definately understant the 3 1/2. Yeah the voice acting was a bit miscasted imo, and I stand by comment I made before on another trend about Chris Meloni being a better Hal than Nathan Fillion, but besides that, Jason Isaacs just didn't seem right as Sinestro and Henry Rollins actually supprised me as Kilowog (the scenes with him and his drill sergeant are classic lol).

But the two biggest upsets to me in this film were as stated above....there was not enough constructs used in the film and not enough Hal Jordan, which is why I can see why someone mentioned before that they actually liked GL: First Flight better than this one.

One thing that REALLY impressed me was the animation. They keep getting better and better with these animated films!! It's like american animation with a touch of anime with just the right amount of cgi and it's to the point to where I don't even wanna watch them on regular dvd....strictly Blu Ray baby lol!!!
DetBullock - 6/9/2011, 12:23 AM
It's "Corps" and not "Core", "Bolfunga" and not "Balfunga", "John" and not "Jon" and I think Alan Scott would have been complicated to explain (and superfluous in a non continuity-related direct-to-video cartoon).
But I had a short "preview" and agree about Kilowog, Madsen was way better in First Flight.
Peteyparker - 6/9/2011, 2:03 PM
Yea i saw the whole thing. Kilo's voice was very distracting but other than that i believe it was great movie giving alot of life to some of the other lantern's and some great history as well. I think this movie is a movie that should be watched before the real movie comes out.
soundwave129 - 6/9/2011, 5:47 PM
Since they made it quite clear that this in no way connected to First Flight (Great movie, by the way.), then why did they decide to do it in the EXACT SAME ANIMATION STYLE? DC's animated movies are great, but they need to put a bit more work in their development.
marvel72 - 6/11/2011, 5:59 PM
i thought it was good,some stories were better than others but overall not bad at all.

3/5 definetly worth the £7.99 blu-ray i paid for it.

the next animated green lantern should be the sinestro corp war.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.