SPIDER-HAM Among The Characters Sony Can't Use In Future SPIDER-MAN Movies

SPIDER-HAM Among The Characters Sony Can't Use In Future SPIDER-MAN Movies

The "Sony Hack" scandal is showing no signs of slowing down, and now a spreadsheet has apparently found its way online full of the characters Sony are unable to use in future movies and those Marvel have "frozen" to keep off the big screen. Hit the jump for a selection of some of the best...

By JoshWilding - Dec 16, 2014 08:12 PM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: Business Insider

Business Insider have been searching through the various Sony files released online over the weekend by hackers, and claim to have come across spreadsheets revealing negotiations between Sony and Marvel over the rights to hundreds of characters from the Spider-Man corner of the comic book universe. As we already know, rights issues tend to be very complicated, and just because Sony can't use them doesn't necessarily mean that Marvel can. Hopefully the full list surfaces at some point as the site have prioritised many of the more humorous sounding characters on the list rather than those fans might one day hope to see as part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Santa Claus Burglar made a single appearance in an '80s comic book, but he was still on a 2011 document titled "Disputed Characters List". Bag-Man, aka The Amazing Bag-Man, aka The Bombastic Bag-Man (Spider-Man in a Fantastic Four costume with a paper bag over his head) has been "frozen", something which seemingly means he can't be used by anyone. Also mentioned are Xandu the Unspeakable,Thermo the Thermatronic Man aka The Street StalkerThe Black Abbot (who Sony stated "We don't care about this character"), Agent 003 (another they have zero interest in), Mother Inferior, and Tordenkakerlakk aka The Thunder Cockroach.
 
However, perhaps most interesting is the mention of Spider-Ham a.k.a Peter Porker, a character some have speculated might have been the focus of the animated movie Sony want Phil Lord and Chris Miller to helm. According to the site, "Marvel informed Sony in 2011 that the character had been frozen." It appears as if he and some of the others mentioned here may not have been included in the original deal which saw Sony acquire the Spider-Man film rights, but being "frozen" likely means Marvel have no way to use him either. What do you guys think?
About The Author:
JoshWilding
Member Since 3/13/2009
Comic Book Reader. Film Lover. WWE and F1 Fan. Rotten Tomatoes-approved critic and ComicBookMovie.com's #1 contributor.
SPIDER-MAN Just Killed [SPOILER] In One Of The Most Heartbreaking Moments In Marvel Comics History
Related:

SPIDER-MAN Just Killed [SPOILER] In One Of The Most Heartbreaking Moments In Marvel Comics History

[SPOILER] Finally Makes Their Triumphant Return To New York In An Unexpected Way In MILES MORALES SPIDER-MAN
Recommended For You:

[SPOILER] Finally Makes Their Triumphant Return To New York In An Unexpected Way In MILES MORALES SPIDER-MAN

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

View Recorder