First Reviews For ABRAHAM LINCOLN: VAMPIRE HUNTER Hit

The embargo has lifted and the first reviews for Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter have hit. Does director Timur Bekmambetov (Wanted) have a hit on his hands or does the unique take on the historic figure fall flat?

Follow Josh:
By Josh Wilding - 6/19/2012
Below are the first few reviews for Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, and it would appear as if the response so far is a mixed (well, mostly negative) one. Of course, it's worth bearing in mind that the likes of Empire, Digital Spy and Total Film have yet to reveal their take, while we're also awaiting the response of various other websites and publications. Be sure to check back here tomorrow for my take on the film.


Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is a strange film, but then it was always going to be. It diverges wildly from the book and mostly for the better, adding more humour and some sense of its own ridiculousness, while also delivering some top notch action scenes. But the story is half formed and the final battle unsatisfying, while the use of the character of Lincoln never really feels essential. And you’d be well advised to catch it in 2D, if you can.


2.5/5

Source: Clickonline.com



here are a lot of amusing nods to historical events and characters that anyone with a high school diploma will find entertaining. But it’s the overall feel of the film that I loved most. Beside’s Walkers spot on Abe, it’s a very dark and violent film. Initially I was sure the studio would want to sell as many tickets as possible to a film that had vampire in the title and slap a PG-13 rating on it. However, Fox, trusting a successful R-rated director in Timur, held nothing back and the film is better for it. It’s incredibly violent and features vampires in the correct and demonic light with which they should be seen. It’s not overly campy but it’s just enough to smirk at and you’ll find yourself saying "Really?" only a few times. The action is far too much fun and grabs you from the first axe swing till the last twirl. Abe’s axe is the new bending bullet.


3.5/5

Source: Hey U Guys



Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’s heart may be in the right place -- and any film that makes people interested in reading up on the real Lincoln must be commended -- but overall the film is, ironically, bloodless, chugging along from Great Lincoln Historical Moment to carefully choreographed action set-piece without ever generating much energy or enthusiasm.


5.5/10

Source: IGN Movies






STARRING:

Benjamin Walker as Abraham Lincoln
Mary Elizabeth Winstead as Mary Todd Lincoln
Rufus Sewell as Adam
Jimmi Simpson as Josh Speed
Dominic Cooper as Henry Sturges
Anthony Mackie as William Johnson
Robin McLeavy as Nancy Lincoln
Alan Tudyk as Stephen A. Douglas
Marton Csokas as Jack Armstrong
Cameron M. Brown as Willie Lincoln

RELEASE DATE: June 22, 2012


DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
0
LIKE!
49 Comments
BlackCondor - 6/19/2012, 3:19 PM
No surprise here
deadpoolbeatsall - 6/19/2012, 3:24 PM
mmhhmm just as i expected
PaulRom - 6/19/2012, 3:25 PM
Expected average responses. Movie looks fun.
BB - 6/19/2012, 3:27 PM
lol how do these count as official theyre are from nowhere credible...lolol ign movies what a joke. i'll wait for proper reviews from total film, empire and rolling stone
DEADP0000L - 6/19/2012, 3:29 PM
so it sucked. okay then i wasn't going to see this film any way
ralfinader - 6/19/2012, 3:30 PM
These reviews sound more positive than I assumed they would.
HelaGood - 6/19/2012, 3:30 PM
figured it would suck, but i totally want to see it!!!
NOLANITE - 6/19/2012, 3:32 PM
I heard good ol team Edward makes an appearance..
The movie looks decent, I mean how much can you expect
With a title like that?
third3ye - 6/19/2012, 3:33 PM
So basically... it's a rental, ish.
myparentsaredead - 6/19/2012, 3:34 PM
I just don't understand why they decided to take the material so seriously. If it had been more tongue-in-cheek, it probably would've gone a lot better. But since it's so serious, it just comes off as ridiculous.
GreenHalJordan - 6/19/2012, 3:37 PM
It looks more like a popcorn flick: Not amazing overall, but definitely entertaining and a movie to see if you have nothing else to do.
HeadlessJensen - 6/19/2012, 3:39 PM
I predict after I see it, I'll love it. To hell with critics!
Scabsallover - 6/19/2012, 3:49 PM
This movie will still take my money. Im not going to boost Pixar's revenue further. Too much faith is placed in that company. That's a week#3 viewing
SHHH - 6/19/2012, 3:50 PM
I Wanna See It....
Scabsallover - 6/19/2012, 3:50 PM
This movie will still take my money. Im not going to boost Pixar's revenue further. Too much faith is placed in that company. That's a week#3 viewing.
marvel72 - 6/19/2012, 3:56 PM
i didn't expect 5/5,so an average movie that'll be worth watching.
BLACKTHORN - 6/19/2012, 3:57 PM
it's rubbish.
TheAmazingChrisReeve63 - 6/19/2012, 3:58 PM
Well, I guess we knew that the movie wouldn't do really well, but heck, I'll still see it. :)
TheAmazingChrisReeve63 - 6/19/2012, 3:58 PM
@72 - Exactly, dude. :)
dnno1 - 6/19/2012, 4:03 PM
BattlinMurdock - 6/19/2012, 4:13 PM
I'm still holding out hope for Lindsay Lohan: Twin Assassin.
LucasMend - 6/19/2012, 4:16 PM
Oh Well, I'm still interested, looks fun
mawilli4 - 6/19/2012, 4:18 PM
Critics are usually assholes anyways. I never trust em. Babel was horrible, and got good reviews. The Boondock Saints was fantastic and got horrible reviews.
HelaGood - 6/19/2012, 4:19 PM
@SteveRogersSon - LMAO!! i hear ya...
HelaGood - 6/19/2012, 4:20 PM
@Maximus101 - i really doubt that, but im excited about it anyway.
samsupes - 6/19/2012, 4:20 PM
Great book. But I am afraid the movie will flop. They have not emphasized in the commercial that this is based off a best selling book. Most people might not know it was already a book, so they will roll their eyes at the concept and save their money for other movies this summer.
AlexDeLarge87 - 6/19/2012, 4:33 PM
Dissapointing

However once again i judge when i see it myself.
8thDynasty - 6/19/2012, 4:36 PM
This is going to be the cause to a lot of failing history reports.
TexasAvenger - 6/19/2012, 4:40 PM
The idea of the whole thing is just stupid. People actually wanna see this crap? Wow...
JokerFanHAhaHA - 6/19/2012, 5:00 PM
@Mawilli- BOONDOCK SAINTS GOT BAD REVIEWS?!?! May the saints preserve us indeed!
I rarely trust critics either. Lots of fan fav movies got horrible reviews.
Bartman87 - 6/19/2012, 5:17 PM
The comments on here are the reason that Hollywood puts out the same SH17 because when they take the chance to do something different people complain it does poorlyand then we go back to the same old routine of remakes and re-imaginings
alekesam - 6/19/2012, 5:20 PM
My friends>critics=not missing as many possible entertaining movies.
HarrisonBergeron - 6/19/2012, 6:03 PM
It seems like a lot of folks here don't seem to understand that it is based on a rather popular book.

I still plan to see "Seeking a Friend" first, but I will see this for the axe-play if for nothing else. I didn't realize that it was rated R, that actually boosts my expectations a bit.
WesleyGibson - 6/19/2012, 6:03 PM
I find it difficult to take this film seriously.
Sourpatch64 - 6/19/2012, 7:04 PM
I just got back from the press screening here in Orlando and it is exactly as expected. Mindless popcorn action flick that almost makes you think "Could this have really happened?" They sync it up with historical events so well that at the end I just thought "I wish this actually WAS the history I was taught." No real character development, and no exceptional acting to speak of, but it was still a lot of fun
Marxman12 - 6/19/2012, 7:25 PM
I think if anything, this movie will get younger audiences interested in historical figures. Personally, I cannot wait for this movie. I loved the book and the reviews are saying the action and humor are well placed. Good enough for me!
SUPERBATSPIDERMAN - 6/19/2012, 8:05 PM
Why can't people go to the movies for some good ole fun anymore? Everything has to be an Oscar winning movie with huge critical acclaim. I love fun movies and I definitely want to see this.
AraxisHT - 6/19/2012, 8:22 PM
It looked sucky. Reviews say it's sucky. It's probably sucky.
I'll probably rent the DVD.
Kovacs - 6/19/2012, 9:38 PM
same old story, book is alway better. It looks like a "fun" film rather than a good one
SuperSomething616 - 6/20/2012, 4:58 AM
Still going to see it!!!
Sourpatch64 - 6/20/2012, 5:10 AM
A FUN film is a GOOD film. Do you go to the movies to be bored? Is that what makes a good film? In my opinion if you go to the movies and enjoy yourself, then you watched a good movie. The whole purpose of film is to entertain, otherwise you would be watching a documentary
nucleargroundhog - 6/20/2012, 5:59 AM
Hell still gonna go see this film. The book was awesome.
SuperFrost - 6/20/2012, 6:59 AM
leave your brain at the door kinda movie.....
LtAnarchy - 6/20/2012, 7:27 AM
@yoss it looks like you need a good slap to the tush. this show looks better than the avengers.
SCURVYDOG619 - 6/20/2012, 8:56 AM
This is from the guy who wrote Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.

He just came out with a new book re-imagining the Three Wise Men as masquerading assassins who wind up
becoming the protectors of baby Jesus. lol

You want to talk about an uproar if THAT book ever gets greenlighted as a movie?

Shadowelfz - 6/20/2012, 11:02 AM
So this film is a comedy, right? It doesnt take itself seriously? If it doesn't it might be worth a watch for a good laugh.
GUNSMITH - 6/20/2012, 12:48 PM
ITS FUN...ROLL WITH IT
CBArtist - 6/20/2012, 1:51 PM
This doesn't even make it on to my "might rent someday" list.
jokerZwild - 6/20/2012, 4:31 PM
I NEVER LISTEN TO CRITICS> THEY HAVE NO CLUE WHAT A REAL MOVIE TRULY IS!!!

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.