Shailene Woodley Seems Pretty Sure That She Won't Be Back For THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 3

Despite saying that "anything can happen", Shailene Woodley seems confident that her commitments to Divergent and the fact that she's heard nothing from the studio means that she won't be returning as 'Mary Jane Watson' in The Amazing Spider-Man 3. Check it out!

Follow Josh:
By Josh Wilding - 1/20/2014


For those of you unable to watch the video, the actress says: "Andrew kills it. I don't know anything, but seeing as how they picked up the next two Divergent films, I don't know how I'd keep my sanity with two big action films in one year. But, anything can happen, so..." What do you guys think? Be sure to let us know your thoughts in the comment section below!






In The Amazing Spider-Man™ 2, for Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield), life is busy – between taking out the bad guys as Spider-Man and spending time with the person he loves, Gwen (Emma Stone), high school graduation can’t come quickly enough. Peter hasn’t forgotten about the promise he made to Gwen’s father to protect her by staying away – but that’s a promise he just can’t keep. Things will change for Peter when a new villain, Electro (Jamie Foxx), emerges, an old friend, Harry Osborn (Dane DeHaan), returns, and Peter uncovers new clues about his past.


STARRING:

Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker/Spider-Man
Emma Stone as Gwen Stacy
Shailene Woodley as Mary Jane Watson
Jamie Foxx as Max Dillon/Electro
Sally Fields as Aunt May

RELEASE DATE: May 2nd, 2014.
Source: MTV News
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and "safe harbor" provisions. CBM will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. You may also learn more about our copyright and trademark policies HERE.
3
LIKE!
171 Comments
1 2 3 4 5
Jollem - 1/20/2014, 8:28 AM
i'd still like to see woodley as mary jane
Jollem - 1/20/2014, 8:28 AM
she's a cutie
marvel72 - 1/20/2014, 8:32 AM
she ain't that bad looking,not really mary jane quality but i would still give her a length of my man meat.
JJJameson - 1/20/2014, 8:37 AM
I think she is a talented actress, but I do think she was miscast as Mary Jane. It's better for both parties if she doesn't come back. There are a lot of talented actresses out there that would suit the part of MJ better IMHO, and I feel it was for the best that the character MJ didn't show up in TASM2, especially if they are going to follow Gwen Stacy's 616 storyline.
Jollem - 1/20/2014, 8:38 AM
Jollem - 1/20/2014, 8:39 AM
anthonyEstark - 1/20/2014, 8:39 AM
Please come Back Shailene! Don't leave us!

M3T4LL0 - 1/20/2014, 8:40 AM
I still think that the big uproar on this site which led to that dumbass "satire" piece on her played a bit of a role to her being cut. Webb & Co. would never admit it, but I'm sure it was a factor.
GreenLantern519 - 1/20/2014, 8:42 AM
I'd like to see her scenes, maybe as an extra on the blu-ray or something. I'm sure she would've done well in the part.
GreenLantern519 - 1/20/2014, 8:43 AM
@MEtallo I really don't think that Marc Webb and Co. give two shits about a comicbookmovie forum site
GodzillaKart - 1/20/2014, 8:44 AM
Cute girl. Don't think she was right for MJ, but who knows?
RetroFit - 1/20/2014, 8:44 AM
Good riddance, Woofley!




Now bring on Jane Levy!

Jollem - 1/20/2014, 8:46 AM
Ror's satire piece was just fine. it's the dumb shit that followed afterward that was [frick]ing ridiculous

anyway, i wouldn't give websites any credit to why things did or did not happen
marvel72 - 1/20/2014, 8:49 AM
the users on this site criticizing the way she looks probably haven't a girlfriend or even been near a woman.
Ranger14 - 1/20/2014, 8:50 AM


My post seems to have fallen in the abyss. This is great news as far as I am concerned. Too plain jane for Mary Jane.
SirTNZ - 1/20/2014, 8:50 AM
She wasn't a good choice for Many Jane by any means but, AlphaFlexx grow the [frick] up.
CaptainAmerica31 - 1/20/2014, 8:55 AM
Nooooo I was looking forward to it. Oh well idk no who will take her place. Probably some bimbo with no acting experience like you assholes wanted
TelaVizion - 1/20/2014, 8:55 AM
She was 100x better choice than Kirsten Dunst... plus she's cuter than Emma
santoanderson - 1/20/2014, 8:56 AM
She looks quite beautiful in the Divergent trailer, but I will agree that she looked really frumpy on the set of Spider-man. I'm not one who normally criticizes an actress' appearance, but yeah, there were lots of spy shots of Shailene walking to set looking like she had just rolled out of bed.
SuperCat - 1/20/2014, 8:58 AM
She looks good to me.
newhire13 - 1/20/2014, 8:58 AM
@Alphaflexxxko let's see how you look!
Maxi91291 - 1/20/2014, 8:58 AM
Whats done is done .. now lets get ready for TASM2, movie looks awesome, cant wait. Also the amazing spider-man game was a rare thing because it was actually very good, cant wait for the next one.
Giznad - 1/20/2014, 9:00 AM
i'm pretty sure the dudes who say she's ugly prolly have girlfriends that look like Violator from Spawn.
JasonGrayson77 - 1/20/2014, 9:00 AM
@TelaVision
Correction. No one is cuter than Emma.
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:02 AM
okei... that sucks!

Just DON'T cast Jane Levy as Mary Jane!!

She is basically Emma Stone's twin.
They look waaay to similar.
DamienA - 1/20/2014, 9:02 AM
Some of you dickhead's need to get a life instead of calling some one ugly from your mother's basement. Get a life,get a girlfriend.
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:04 AM
Mary Elizabeth Winstead
TheBaroness89 - 1/20/2014, 9:04 AM
Ok so a group of nerds won that battle and pretty much convinced Sony to drop their choice for Mary Jane....that being said why is this sort of tactic not working when it comes to Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman ?
TheBaroness89 - 1/20/2014, 9:05 AM
I do agree though Woodley is CUTE but Mary Jane Watson really should be SMOKING HOT. Like Alexandra Daddario hot.
Mysterion - 1/20/2014, 9:06 AM
what about Deborah Ann Woll?
Deborah ann woll photo: deborah ann woll deborahannwoll.jpg
HulkDraxGroot - 1/20/2014, 9:07 AM
she is cute but she sure aint in mj's league.
theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:09 AM
MrFridayNights

"You [frick]ing virgin"

are you thirteen years old?? haha, Who's a big boy!?
Kyos - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
She's a talented actress, and really cute. Not sure about her as MJ, though.
CaptainJugular77 - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
Whether the fan uproar had a part in it or not, it's a shame that people gave this girl so much shit based on photos of her GOING TO THE SET. Probably after having just woken up. You just can't go by those - set photos made Mila Kunis look ugly. The girl is pretty, as seen in any other pictures/films she was in. Regardless, the fact that people made such a big deal out of it is stupid. Fans need to choose whether they want some eye candy model/Megan Fox type who can't act their way out of a paper bag, or an actual actress who would do the character justice. And simply put, Shailene Woodley can act.
MsDarkPhoenix - 1/20/2014, 9:13 AM
Gusto wants Miley for MJ but I think Bieber would be better to play her.
superan - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
That's unfortunate...she's such a charming, charismatic actress. Hopefully she stays in the franchise.
DraculaX - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
Ah Woodley gate, such a crazy time.


theowl - 1/20/2014, 9:14 AM
MrFridayNights

haha, okay
Nomis - 1/20/2014, 9:15 AM
@ TheOwl - Exactly!

DraculaX - 1/20/2014, 9:15 AM
I don't know which casting had the most uproar this year. MJ/Woodley, Gadot/WW or Batfleck. I guess Batfleck.
1 2 3 4 5

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.