Misspelled apocalyptic, in the last paragraph, by the way.

@PaulRom- Neither do I, but all film corporations are greedy and WB will want to cash in on the success of the movie.

@MovieMaster: Great find bro! Inception is one of my all time favorites but if WB goes on this project without Nolan it will certainly be a travesty. Infact I'd probably murder them all myself.

A sequel seems pretty unnecessary. However, there rumors a while back about Nolan being interested in making an Inception video game, and that would be the tits.

Nope. Nolan wrote Inception a long time ago, and went on record saying there would be no sequels to that film. Plus a sequel wouldn't work and Nolan is too smart a film maker to try and make it. The person who e-mailed you is a liar and a fraud and I wouldn't listen to a word he has to say going forward.

If it is about terrorists then bring it on real. It shouldnt be the middle-east, it should be the west, then it would be one big movie.

I think he has way to much Integrity as a film maker just to make a sequel for the sake of it making 100's of millions again

thats why TDKR took so long to come out

and if they make an Inception sequel without him their [frick]ing idiots

[frick] you WB! money grubbing bastards.

Obviously Nolan would have a far bigger budget and make a whole lot more out of it, but if the economy turning to civil war idea is true, it's reminiscent of a short indie film (made for 1/10th's of pennies to the dollar of Inception and you can tell of course lol) called "The Sound of Midnight" that came out recently.

http://vimeo.com/33892425

@teabag I think we're about to get shunned for not liking a Nolan movie. You better throw up some boobs to distract the nolanites

he'll have to up his game with the sequel,it will have to feature a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream within a dream.

It's an interesting concept for a movie. But one of the reasons Inception is brilliant is because it stands alone

Hope that's BS.

Inception is one of these movies that simply doesn't need sequels, it's brilliant for that it is.

Unless of course we have a tremendously, excellent new idea as shocking as the ones that made the first one soo good.

I've been watching the Matrix trilogy again some time ago and I came to the conclusion Reloaded wasn't bad. It opened more plot spaces, but revolutions was a simple, generic robots vs man sci-fi movie. No revolutionary idea. I'd expect something like a matrix contingency (matrix within matrix), in which Neo would be the first "chosen" to transcend. The movie could even stop there, with Neo being the first person to wake up in this new reality, giving us the doubt if that was the real world or just another contingency.

OK, the matrix thing is because I don't want the same to happen to Inception.

I smell BS... No way would WB piss Nolan off by toying with his ideas, he's their cash cow... and the last thing they want to do is drive away their money maker.

Im sorry but this just sounds like a terrible idea, it almost makes me cry (not literally). What people dont understand is that "Inception" was not just a great movie because of the concept of dream sharing but because of the pseudo-spy thriller backdrop and the plot and previous history with the characters. Its not just an idea that can be super imposed over any plot, all of the Characters had REAL DEPTH to them. Doing a sequel without the main characters just seems like an injustice, you mind as well just make an entirely new franchise.

Considering alot of loose ends were tied and broken at the end of "Inception" it seems kind of pointless to make a sequel. It is a single minded film for lack of better words, its about a man struggling to come to terms with his reality and accepting what has happened as he goes deeper into his own self conscience. The end of that story is Cobb coming to terms with the fact that his wife is gone, and that he did all he could to save her. Going off into another tangent seems like it defeats the purpose in that respect, after all in the end its about Dom Cobb getting a grip with his reality , which he may or may not have done depending on how you look at the ending of the film.

Final point is, its a character driven story, not just a plot point for you to superimpose of any given story line. Inception without Dicaprio, Levitt, Ellen Page, or Tom Hardy mind as well be a Superman movie without Superman.... it just defeats the purpose.