Where Have All the Good Editorials Gone and Where Are All the Gods?

Editorials should not be taken lightly. They're not just well-articulated opinion pieces, but statements that desire to ignite discussion and debate with a clear-cut, direct path. Here is an editorial about the necessity of the contents of an editorial.

Follow BattlinMurdock:
By BattlinMurdock - 8/18/2012
An editorial is one author saying to an audience, "This is my take in a logical, coherent medium, and I wish for you to take its contents into consideration, as this is not a fleeting thought, but something I find absolutely worthy of its own novel stature."

Learn the difference between a comment and an editorial. Editorials have clear directions and are often composed of more than one thought or direction. They approach a subject in a light that is meant to resonate with a specific audience. Either that, or an editorial is a constructive analysis of a specific subject, listing the elements that compose said subject and reflecting upon the pros and cons of them. It's important to understand the difference between an "opinion" and an "editorial," because an editorial is not merely a long opinion, it is an article meant to spur open-ended discussion that seems necessary in light of recent events.

For example, on CBM.com, an editorial can be made about the resonating effects of the events in a comic book movie and how they will affect future properties. An editorial should not be made about the failures of a specific movie based on personal distaste. However, an editorial talking about the failure of a specific branch of a movie (ie. Why John Carter's Marketing Team is To Blame For One of Disney's Greatest Flops) is acceptable, as long as one has plenty to contribute to said argument with valid evidence and research.



Editorials should not be used as soapboxes to preach or sway anyone in one direction; they are used to open up perceptive channels that the audience may not have thought before. Editorials are not to be used to make the authors seem to have some higher authority on a specific subject than their audience; they should be inviting.

Editorials can be written about theories, so long as the theory is taken into consideration by the author to be coherent, logical, and able to be discussed. Editorials can be written about specific directions one would like to see taken by a property, so long as that direction is clear and well-researched.

Here at CBM, we're given the gift of writing any editorial as we please; this should not be abused. There are places and tabs meant for Fan-Fiction and Reviews. Do not use the Editorial section merely to get views for your opinions if they do not fit within the criteria of an editorial. Editorials are, by definition, opinion pieces; but not every opinion piece is an editorial. I'd love to see an editorial from everyone; seeing this site transform into a place of debate instead of war using research, evidence, and clear positions is a (albeit difficult) possibility. I look forward to reading about a multitude of directions, opinions, and theories from all my comic book movie brethren in the future...

...I just hope it's something worth discussing.
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
12
LIKE!
27 Comments
Tainted87 - 8/18/2012, 9:54 PM
"Editorials should not be taken lightly. They're not just well-articulated opinion pieces, but statements that desire to ignite discussion and debate with a clear-cut, direct path."
^This. My last editorial was written over a few nights of work breaks before being proof-read.

Another tip....

Consider the purpose of your editorial. Suppose you look back on your little archive (your portfolio, if you will) in 6-10 months, maybe even a year from now. Will it still seem necessary, or necessary at the time?

I'll use BattlinMurdock's editorial last week as an example, where he gave 5 reasons why Daredevil should return back to Marvel. Within a matter of hours, it was pretty much announced that Marvel will in fact, be picking up the rights to the Man Without Fear in October. Did this announcement make his editorial useless? No, on the contrary, the announcement served to strengthen the points within the article.
CorndogBurglar - 8/18/2012, 10:11 PM
Comic critic, I disagree with every single article you write, and I think you suck.

BUT, you write good articles.

Marvelite/TeamDarkAvenger writes the worst. I've tried giving the guy advice on how to do it properly, but he just doesnt listen.

I wish I had more time to write one. I've got a few ideas rolling around. Maybe tomorrow?
CorndogBurglar - 8/18/2012, 10:12 PM
@ teamdarkavenger

You do realize this article is written about editorials like yours, right?

When you write an article, and three quarters if the comments are making fun of it, then it usually means it sucks, dude.
CorndogBurglar - 8/18/2012, 10:14 PM
@ darkavenger

I hope so, I reallh wasnt trying to be mean with it. If you write articles, your reputation is determined by them.
StormLoganSummers - 8/18/2012, 10:31 PM
I expected this to be written by that crazy fellow.
TonyChu - 8/18/2012, 11:20 PM
Could not agree anymore. And BattiilinMurdock, like Ai said earlier you have been one of the very few to actually make good editorials.
RedHood13 - 8/19/2012, 4:34 AM
ComicCritic is THE worste, but at least he puts thought in them. The worste is everyone who written a 99 reasons article and the guy who did he Avengers most overrated film things.
Ghostt - 8/19/2012, 6:06 AM
nice article...I think... I dozed off halfway through and didn't finish reading.

Now that you've got that out of your system, get back to writing your usual fantastic editorials.
6of13 - 8/19/2012, 8:34 AM
I am glad BattlinMurdock wrote this article. Tainted's last editorial is a fantastic example of of a well-written editorial. And by that I am not only referring to the fact that his grammar, spelling and layout were correct, but also that he rationalised his points and included examples to support his argument. Actually, BattlinMurdock's article echoes exactly what I just said above about Tainted's article.


It annoys me that people seem to celebrate mediocrity this days. I see above the word "great" being used to describe Comic's articles. Synonyms for the word "great" include "excellent" and "skillful". "Fantastic", "brilliant" and "admirable" are also synonyms. I am quite simply astonished to see the word "great" being used here. When the majority of comments responding to an article smack of derision, scorn and contempt, there is nothing admirable about the article. I would reciprocate with "feeble". I could also use the word "banal", but it would be an exaggeration.




UniBeam11 - 8/19/2012, 10:13 AM
is it totally gay that this title made me think of that song "where have all the cowboys gone"? ahhh, the 90s. Good write up friend! I had given up on reading most editorials because they are not coherent, they are extremely biased and not well articulated. Usually when i read an editorial within the first few sentences i can see if it is going in the wrong direction i write it off and dont bother with reading the rest. Battlin, you are a gem on this site! hope i can gain a respectable reputation on here the way you have! haha
BizarroGrif - 8/19/2012, 10:13 AM
So an article that was intended to encourage us to write editorials that will spark lively debate has sparked nothing more than everone bashing each others attempts at editorials. Funny.

@BattlinMurdock good points. I agree completely but not everyone is a skilled writer and while there is no reason not to encourage users to improve their writing, they cannot do that unless they put it into practise. I say listen up people but don't be put off. You got as much right to contribute to this site as anyone else
Joslezio85 - 8/19/2012, 10:55 AM
Screw all this, ill take shaman and hawk over you guys anyday
GoILL - 8/19/2012, 11:14 AM
Good shit Battlin.
Equivocal - 8/19/2012, 11:23 AM
it wouldn't be too many VERY BAD EDITORIALS

IF

the staff don't let 'em publish !
most of them are painful to read if not below mediocre....

*sigh*
darkmetal - 8/19/2012, 11:29 AM
@Equivocal There are persons abusing the power of being able to create Editorials here. What they don't realize is that if we some of us begin reading some very biased and childish look at a movie or comic we simply stop reading.
Like the "99 things wrong with Dark Knight Rises".
I didn't bother to read that fanboy rant.
deadpoolbeatsall - 8/19/2012, 11:45 AM
@DarkAvenger anyone who says they write the best editorials I noticed write shitty ones. I'm making you as an example.
inky - 8/19/2012, 12:01 PM
some are worthy of note.
redsonjustin - 8/19/2012, 1:06 PM
Love the title of this and the song it's inspired by.
jaewest215 - 8/19/2012, 2:18 PM
This was written by a professional. Some of these "editorals" are nothing but opinions. Most of the people on here have an agenda and nothing intelligent to say.

I would love to do an editorial on the influence of The Batman series on comic book movies but I don't know how to do it intelligently. One day I will make it happen.
Geektality - 8/19/2012, 2:44 PM
Go to my site & you'll see real editorials that took me days to write. Yes. Days. Unlike the dozens of moronic, poorly thought-out drivel that floods the Editorial Section of CBM every day. I take days to write my articles. Either think before you type up a two-paragraph whine-fest, or don't post articles on CBM. Nuff said.
NostalgicYouth - 8/19/2012, 5:55 PM
I like stupid editorials because there is so much bickering afterwards, its like looking at two sexy girls fight except your reading it and it involves comic books, and movies
inky - 8/20/2012, 2:47 AM
i feel any fair editorial is in its self the start to a good debate, a poor editorial forces debate and disagreement subject matter is paramount, but all sides need to be reached and commented on fairly, no one wins when they degenerate the debate to slagging matches or what ever.
dezdigi - 8/20/2012, 7:59 AM
Well said. Hopefully, people listen and improve their articles.
CorndogBurglar - 8/20/2012, 9:41 AM
Well at least Comic Critic and TeamDarkAvenger/TheMarvelite got banned. No more of their nonsense anymore!
CorndogBurglar - 8/20/2012, 9:42 AM
@ Hybrid

I don't really agree with your editorials most of the time, but I can't say they are low quality. Thats all taht really matters. People don't have to agree with what your saying for it to be a quality article. :)
CorndogBurglar - 8/20/2012, 7:37 PM
@ hybrid

Yeah man, I've 3 or 4 very original ideas brewing, I just dont have the time between family and work. I'll get to them soon though.
ThunderKat - 8/22/2012, 7:30 PM
The problem is that the people who need to follow this advice, probably won't read this one. They are mired in their myopic opines regarding loving or hating a character or movie. Their editorials are more rants than comments.

I agree with you except that editorials are to be persuasive. It's okay to be a little one-sided as long your writing is well articulated.

Bravo!

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.