First Wave Of Reviews For TOTAL RECALL

First Wave Of Reviews For TOTAL RECALL

A collection of reviews for Len Wiseman's remake of Total Recall. Is the new film better than the original that starred Arnold Schwarzenegger? Click the jump to find out.

By nailbiter111 - Aug 02, 2012 12:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Sci-Fi



IGN
While it has a few nods to the 1990 film, this Total Recall brings nothing new to the table, no clever spin or unique take on the story's premise. Love it or hate it, the original movie at least had personality thanks to its absurd sense of humor. It was a truly excessive movie – not the least of all in its violence – but this Total Recall is like a declawed animal. Anything that could have made this version distinct simply isn’t present.

That’s a shame, too, given the vulnerability and much-needed humanity Farrell brings to the proceedings. He’s the best thing in the film besides the practical sets that keep it from being yet another genre film with an entirely CG environment. Beckinsale appears to be enjoying herself as the film’s villainess -- a role that essentially combines the Sharon Stone and Michael Ironside characters from the original film -- but she’s just mere eye candy and a cipher. Also lacking in dimension but blessed with beauty is Biel's Melina, while Cranston's Cohaagen doesn't possess the malevolent glee that made Ronny Cox’s villain fun.

Click Here To Read The Full Review


MOVIE CITY NEWS
The man can’t keep visual track of the action in an elevator. Literally. In this movie, there is a 4 person fight sequence in an elevator and you never know where anyone out of frame at any moment is or what they are doing. This is in spite of big martial arts moves and guns going off. It’s like Police Squad, with the shoot out between people who turn out to be 3 feet away from one another when you see a wide shot.

The central notion of the film – is Quaid really a spy or is it all a Rekall implanted dream – is answered in the opening sequence… removing any tension or interest in that theme. So the film, by the second act, is reduced to a fairly boring, uninventive chase film. The film is enveloped with a conceit about a world reduced to two countries (not a spoiler… in the opening credits) with the rich and powerful on one side and the rest on the other. But any nod to revolution is as shallow as a toddler pool. This movie, unlike the original bit of psychotic genius by Verhoeven, takes itself insanely seriously, which sucks nearly every ounce of fun out of the thing.

Click Here To Read The Full Review


HITFIX
The new film is undeniably a remake of the 1990 film, and not a new adaptation of "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale" by Philip K. Dick. So much of what was invented for the film has made its way into the new version that trying to deny that it's a direct remake is a sucker's game. In many ways, Len Wiseman and screenwriters Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback seem to know that people will be playing the comparison game the whole time, so they play off of that. They pay things off as jokes that you'll only get if you know the original film, or they make choices that run directly counter to the original, as a way of keeping you off-balance. There's a lovely tribute to the work of Rob Bottin that I laughed at, doubly so once I saw how it played out in the end. This movie is a reaction to the original as much as it's a remake, and because of that, I think it manages to carve out its own identity.

Technically, the new "Total Recall" is handsomely made, and the cast does exactly what they were hired to do. I think Wiseman's gotten better and better at staging large scale high velocity action of a certain type, and younger audiences who go simply for an action film, who have no real expectations based on the older film, are probably going to walk away happiest. I thought Farrell did just enough at suggesting the Quaid that I am interested in for me to enjoy the film superficially. It doesn't stick, though, and a premise like this should stick. It's not enough just to be well-made and noisy… when you've got material this rich, you owe it to the audience to make the smartest possible version and to really have some fun with it.

Click Here To Read The Full Review


FANGORIA
As for anything fresh, don’t believe the rumors that the 2012 version of RECALL might be a drastic overhaul hewing closer to Dick’s short story. It ends up restaging almost all of the previous film’s story beats, although the Mars setting and mutants have been excised (along with any trace of the original’s playful humor). Farrell and Biel adopt the new film’s overserious approach in their straightforward and somewhat bland performances, although a blitheringly basic, point A-to-point-B script by Kurt Wimmer and Mark Bomback offers them zero assistance.

As fun, muscular piffle, Verhoeven’s TOTAL RECALL won’t be enshrined in the Smithsonian anytime soon; still, most action fans look back upon the flick fondly, even with 22 years of dust on it. Sad to report, then, that this well-constructed yet stiff, safe and unnecessary RECALL remake is bound to fade from your memory in a considerably shorter period of time.

Click Here To Read The Full Review


TWITCH FILM
Those first 10 minutes firmly establish that Total Recall exists in the same stylistic realm as Wiseman's Underworld and Underworld: Evolution -- with a tight color palette, mostly confined to dark blues, greys, and inky blacks -- and shares the same lack of affinity for classic action traditions as Live Free or Die Hard. In other words, they are well-nigh incomprehensible, as far as being able to locate and/or recognize the characters within each scene. It's all a blur of motion and speed and bloodless PG-13 violence, which provides as much excitement as watching an electric blender in action. And as the chopped-up bits accumulate, any interest that might have been generated by the potential of the premise is steadily dissipated.

Beyond a sprinkling of homages to the 1990 version, the reboot's limited strengths are displayed in the highly-detailed special effects, the strong production design, and some of the futuristic ideas for products that are showcased. (Although even in these areas, the film's debts to Blade Runner and I, Robot are inescapable.) Again, those are things that Len Wiseman knows how to handle, and handle pretty well; but action and story and characters and acting, not so much.

Click Here To Read The Full Review



Total Recall is an action thriller about reality and memory, inspired anew by the famous short story "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale" by Philip K. Dick. Welcome to Rekall, the company that can turn your dreams into real memories. For a factory worker named Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell), even though he's got a beautiful wife (Kate Beckinsale) who he loves, the mind-trip sounds like the perfect vacation from his frustrating life - real memories of life as a super-spy might be just what he needs. But when he procedure goes horribly wrong, Quaid becomes a hunted man. Finding himself on the run from the police -- controlled by Chancellor Cohaagen (Bryan Cranston), the leader of the free world -- Quaid teams up with a rebel fighter (Jessica Biel) to find the head of the underground resistance (Bill Nighy) and stop Cohaagen. The line between fantasy and reality gets blurred and the fate of his world hangs in the balance as Quaid discovers his true identity, his true love, and his true fate.




Total Recall is scheduled to be released August 3, 2012. Starring Colin Farrell as Doug Quaid, Kate Beckinsale as Lori, Bryan Cranston as Vilos Cohaagen, Jessica Biel as Melina, Bill Nighy as Quatto, and John Cho as McClane.

THE RUNNING MAN's Glen Powell On Why He Prefers To Play An Ordinary Guy Over A Superhero
Related:

THE RUNNING MAN's Glen Powell On Why He Prefers To Play An Ordinary Guy Over A Superhero

Vietnam War Combat Meets Lethal Dinosaur Predators In Brutal PRIMITIVE WAR SDCC Trailer
Recommended For You:

Vietnam War Combat Meets Lethal Dinosaur Predators In Brutal PRIMITIVE WAR SDCC Trailer

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

AmazingFantasy
AmazingFantasy - 8/2/2012, 12:35 AM
REMAKES always get hate, always. I'll see this, make my own opinion now take them from snobby fat [frick]s.
SoFresh
SoFresh - 8/2/2012, 12:40 AM
^this
mk
mk - 8/2/2012, 12:47 AM
redbox for me.. LOL
jj2112
jj2112 - 8/2/2012, 1:06 AM
Not going to watch it. It would have been interesting to see a different version of Dick's story, but this confirms what I thought, it's just a rehash of old material.
CoolantTech
CoolantTech - 8/2/2012, 1:12 AM
Well it looks like Judge Dredd will be better
Ceejay
Ceejay - 8/2/2012, 1:16 AM
The fact that Austrian-Arnold isn't in it and the whole film isn't set on Mars with that shot-in-a-studio look is enough for me to buy tickets.

Kate Beckinsale and Jessica Biel in the same flick? ..Can't wait to own it!
pro346
pro346 - 8/2/2012, 1:18 AM
I don't pay any attention to critics...I'm going to see this!
SchoolieD
SchoolieD - 8/2/2012, 1:38 AM
They sound a lot like my comments on the recent Fright Night remake.
lunesta
lunesta - 8/2/2012, 2:01 AM
meh hope the bourne legacy shits all over it
Fless22
Fless22 - 8/2/2012, 2:03 AM
Wow, apparently it's mediocre, and to imagine, they [frick]ed up with such rich source material.

Give me a break, the original was stupid, and this one ain't no different. It was bad then and it's bad now.

I will reserve complete judgement though due to having seen it, but I strongly get the impression that just like the original, I will not be fond of it.
TheWebSlinger
TheWebSlinger - 8/2/2012, 2:38 AM
Not going to listen to these reviews, will see myself then judge. Remakes always get questionable hate.
BillyBatson1000
BillyBatson1000 - 8/2/2012, 2:51 AM
If we stop going to see these lame, cash-in reboots, they'll stop making them. Make a stand.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 8/2/2012, 4:04 AM
Well, no big surprises there.
orpheus
orpheus - 8/2/2012, 4:18 AM
I love the animosity towards critics being shown here, even though there is absolutely nothing snobbish about what the critics are saying here. Critics serve to warn you about what you might spend money on as well as engage and highlight deeper themes of a film where necessary. What's most ironic is half of the complainers of critics attempt to become critics themselves, writing flat, uninspired reviews and commentary without and real sense of taste, all while assuming that anyone cares about their dull opinion.
ralfinader
ralfinader - 8/2/2012, 4:27 AM
Sounded like a shit idea from the get go. Regardless about what the critics say, the little I have seen makes the movie look like a watered down remake of Arnold's movie. No thanks, not interested in this except to hate the fact it got made.
MarkCassidy
MarkCassidy - 8/2/2012, 4:42 AM
Orpheus x 10000. It's laughable. "[frick] critics! Nobody's gonna tell ME which shitty movies I can't go see!" If you didn't already know that a Len Wiseman movie was going to be sub par, what else is there to talk about anyway? Run along, enjoy the movie if that's your bag..but don't talk shit about professional critics who are just calling a spade a spade at the end of the day.
Woodsy
Woodsy - 8/2/2012, 4:57 AM
@NinjaJesus how the [frick] havent you seen the original?
Woodsy
Woodsy - 8/2/2012, 4:58 AM
what the [frick], why did it change [frick] to frick?
Woodsy
Woodsy - 8/2/2012, 4:58 AM
holy shit its done it again :s
Unionjack
Unionjack - 8/2/2012, 5:21 AM
@Grif - agree with you about Total Recall, don't see the point in remaking films with such a twist!!

Robocop on the other hand is a totally different kettle of fish and needs a reboot. If done correctly!!
CrowPirate1
CrowPirate1 - 8/2/2012, 5:37 AM
Neither Total Recall or Robocop needed reboots. The Brady Bunch movie really needs the reboot! I mean.. Marcia Marcia Marcia? Needs def more gore and zombies... and the explosions was almost nonexistent...

I counted a very low death count.

I'm ready for the reboot. anyone else?
DaenerysTargaryen
DaenerysTargaryen - 8/2/2012, 6:45 AM
Knew it would suck
Coloso
Coloso - 8/2/2012, 8:07 AM
Exactly Orpheus! I knew from the get-go that this film would not hold a candle to Arnie's and that was without a critic telling me I was right. Critics serve their purpose and I don't conveniently dismiss them when I have a bias (i.e. a move I've been looking forward to) towards a film. Their reviews along with my gut feeling on what I see and hear about a new film has saved me money and time over and over again.
devil
devil - 8/2/2012, 9:44 AM
i dont like when there remake movie under 15 years there sould do it after 40 years remake movies
BIGBMH
BIGBMH - 8/2/2012, 10:13 AM
I don't really get why people are criticizing a remake for being a remake. I think it's more about bringing the story to a new audience than redefining it.
SteveBosell
SteveBosell - 8/2/2012, 11:42 AM
I agree with BIGGMH. The film doesn't need to be drastically different. From the looks of the trailers, the visuals look amazing and Farrell and Beckinsale seem to have some really cool Taken-esque fight scenes. I'm also looking forward to the Director's Cut which I hope is released in the Blu-Ray. I heard the Director's Cut really plays on the psychology of the film's story and that the studio cut a lot of that out for the finished film.
vtopa
vtopa - 8/2/2012, 11:51 AM
Wasted opportunity...
musashi
musashi - 8/2/2012, 3:09 PM
The best part of this could have been the "is it real?" or "is it recall?" but it says that that's answered in the opening sequence. That is definitely a wasted opportunity.

By the end of the movie, fans should have been debating about whether it actually happened or if he was still in the recall chair. It should have been ambiguous dammit!

Oh well, grif called it again.

View Recorder