TOTAL RECALL: Costume & Character Design For Three-Breasted Hooker

Baby, you're gonna wish you had three hands. Artists, Christian Cordella and Robert McKinnon, had the pleasure of working on Len Wiseman's Total Recall remake. Come see their costume and character designs for the three-breasted hooker (played by Kaitlyn Leeb).

Follow nailbiter111:
By nailbiter111 - 12/1/2013

Costume Illustrations by Christian Cordella

Click to see uncensored version

Concept Art by Robert McKinnon

Click to see uncensored version

Total Recall is an action thriller about reality and memory, inspired anew by the famous short story “We Can Remember It For You Wholesale” by Philip K. Dick. Welcome to Rekall, the company that can turn your dreams into real memories. For a factory worker named Douglas Quaid (Colin Farrell), even though he's got a beautiful wife (Kate Beckinsale) who he loves, the mind-trip sounds like the perfect vacation from his frustrating life - real memories of life as a super-spy might be just what he needs. But when the procedure goes horribly wrong, Quaid becomes a hunted man. Finding himself on the run from the police – controlled by Chancellor Cohaagen (Bryan Cranston), the leader of the free world – Quaid teams up with a rebel fighter (Jessica Biel) to find the head of the underground resistance (Bill Nighy) and stop Cohaagen. The line between fantasy and reality gets blurred and the fate of his world hangs in the balance as Quaid discovers his true identity, his true love, and his true fate.
JoeMomma29 - 12/1/2013, 6:04 PM
Pasto - 12/1/2013, 6:08 PM
Dat fat guy is totally a lover of mens!
Banner - 12/1/2013, 6:55 PM
I love the movie, better than the original. Colin is bad ass in this movie and the story is logical enough and the triple tit slut is way more beautiful this time unlike unlike the old hag in the original.
SunfireUrA55 - 12/1/2013, 6:57 PM
@ Banner. Agreed. It was a WHOOOOOOLE lot better than the original. I was hoping they'd make a sequel.
Dick - 12/1/2013, 6:58 PM
I cant stand Arnold's funny accent, and yeah the movie is way better than the original.
JoeMomma29 - 12/1/2013, 6:58 PM
@ Banner

I agree 100% with you!
Banner - 12/1/2013, 7:00 PM
@Sunfire... yeah a sequel would be cool.
ForeverPowerful - 12/1/2013, 7:04 PM
Still love the original more.

Only thing that made me kinda like this one was Kate Beckinsale.
thewolveRAYne - 12/1/2013, 7:05 PM
No no no. Arnolds original is way better. Sharon Stone in her prime puts ms. Timberlake and the other broad to shame. Plus anyone can act better than Colin. Even Arnold.
Howlett - 12/1/2013, 7:14 PM
it's funny how people love the original when Arnold's story was so confusing to watch it hurts. go on watch your old Total Recall VHS tapes.
JoeMomma29 - 12/1/2013, 7:18 PM
The only good thing in the original film was the eye popping on mars!

Dick - 12/1/2013, 7:19 PM
@Pokerface FTW!!!

ToxicCap - 12/1/2013, 7:33 PM
I just want a sequel to Dredd…
Banner - 12/1/2013, 7:37 PM
If I'm able to pick a female lead in an action movie I would choose Kate Beckinsale over Sharon Stone any day.
DrDoom - 12/1/2013, 8:50 PM
The original Total Recall is one of the stupidest piece of shit movies I've ever seen.

The remake is awesome.
supermarioworldE - 12/1/2013, 9:26 PM
Yet another example of a remake ripping off ideas from the original, without the same context.
MightyZeus - 12/1/2013, 11:17 PM
I thought this movie was horrible. What an unnecessary remake to an awesome film. Also what a waste to those concept pictures.
jimoakley666 - 12/2/2013, 1:19 AM
"Censored"?! [frick] off CBM.
Bl00dwerK - 12/2/2013, 1:20 AM
@Banner You are correct, sir. Total Recall 2012 was better in every way. The only thing the original had going for it was Ahnold. Colin was a better protagonist, Biel a better partner, and Kate Backinsale was an AWESOME villian. She should play a baddie more often...
Durranto - 12/2/2013, 2:18 AM
Lol, this remake was shockingly bad. Colin was rubbish in it, so was Kate(though she was hot as hell in it!) and everything was simplified so idiots could get their heads around the concept of the movie. The original, though dated quite bad, is still better.

I actually nearly fell asleep watching this and I was bored sh1tless! That hardly ever happens to me.
Nomis1800 - 12/2/2013, 5:40 AM
campblood - 12/2/2013, 5:48 AM
at least the old one had you trying to figure out if its a dream or reality

the new one is a standard action movie nothing more . but I get some of you don't have the brain power to think about something other than the smell of chris Nolan's farts

Durranto - 12/2/2013, 5:55 AM
@CampBlood - agreed!
sameoldthing - 12/2/2013, 7:52 AM
Anyone thinks the remake was better than Arnold's version is a TOTAL idiot.
See what I did there?
Only the 2 hot girls & 3 Tits were worth watching.
fettastic - 12/2/2013, 8:02 AM
I never bothered to see this film, until last night. I picked it up the steel book Blu-ray combo pack for like $7 at Walmart on Black Friday. The film is almost total shit. It's just garbage. Nothing feels connected to anything else. This 3-breasted hooker is a good example. In the original film, Quaid went to Mars which was populated by mutants, made that way by substandard environmental domes. In this film, she just shows up on the street for no apparent reason.

Ultimately there was no reason to make this movie because the new plot is ridiculous, shit just happens out of the blue constantly and seeing the original film is almost required to figure out why certain scenes even exist. Simply as a way to retool the original scene unfortunately.

As the closing credits came up I saw that Kurt Wimmer (Ultraviolet) wrote the script. Well that figures because all the script problems of that film are present here.
fettastic - 12/2/2013, 8:16 AM
Anyone saying this new version is anywhere CLOSE to the quality of the original, let alone PASSING IT, is a complete and utter fool and should be pointed at and laughed at every day of their miserable, [frick]ed up little pathetic lives.

The original film was shot on a budget of $65M and earned over $261M (about $460M today). It has an 84% tomato meter reading.

This new abomination was shot for $125M and had a return of $198M. It has a tomato meter score of 30%.

It's not even close. There is no margin for opinion here, one movie is a fun, exciting classic; the other is a wretched, steaming pile of [frick]ing diarrhea.
Steelgoat - 12/2/2013, 1:51 PM
Three tits. That's awesome.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. is protected from liability under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) and "safe harbor" provisions. CBM will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please contact us for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. You may also learn more about our copyright and trademark policies HERE.