ComicBookMovie.com Start A Fansite!
You are not currently logged in. Login

Sony Paying Andrew Garfield $500,000 For Spider-Man Reboot

Deadline is reporting that Sony will pay Garfield an estimated $500,000 to take over the role of Peter Parker in Marc Webb's upcoming reboot of the franchise.
Sure that ain't chicken feed to the average Joe. But in the worlds of big budget Hollywood blockbusters, it's really not a lot, especially when you consider how much Tobey Maguire made from his three portrayals of Parker. But then of course, we always knew Sony were going to bring this one in at a much lower budget. I suppose it's not that surprising.

Tobey Maguire was paid $4 million for the first film. It has been reported that he was paid $17.5 million plus 5% back-end for "Spider-Man 2," and $15 million plus 7.5% back-end for "Spider-Man 3." And he was supposedly offered $20 million plus a small percentage of backend for "Spider-Man 4" which of course was scrapped in favor of this reboot. According to Deadline:

..I'm told Garfield's pay scale on the film is around $500,000 salary on the first film, $1 million for the second one, and $2 million for the third film. All of the finalists were presented with those terms in a deal for one film and two options.]

Director Marc Webb had a lot of critical and commercial success with his debut feature 500 Days Of Summer, although he still wouldn't have been considered a big time player by any means. And of course Garfield is a relative unknown. Appearing in mainly indie fare like Boy A, the Red Riding series, The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus etc. But gaining huge praise and plaudits for his work. So it seems like Sony has managed to nab some big time talent for hardly any cash at all. I think that might be a good thing. Obviously a film like Spider-man needs special effects, but without millions upon millions to splurge, sometimes a movie will focus on story and character more than it might have before--which is never a bad thing. I'm still not in favor of this reboot, but if they can make it the best they can, I'll certainly give it a chance!

But despite rumors(and hopes) that with the casting of the 26 year old Garfield, the movie would change its proposed high school setting for either college, or even have the story take place around the same time period that the third Raimi movie ended(sort of requel style a la The Incredible Hulk) it seems as if it's still going to go the Spidey 90210 route.

The film will begin shooting by year's end for a July 3, 2012 release date from a script by Jamie Vanderbilt.

DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal of copyrighted material, contact us HERE.

72 Comments

Toby may be getting older...but he sure as hell looks smug lol






:P
teabag - 7/5/2010, 8:59 AM
damm to me that's a lot of money
flames809 - 7/5/2010, 9:02 AM
@ flames .. Me too.
TABOO13 - 7/5/2010, 9:04 AM
i'd blow it in a weekend lol :D
teabag - 7/5/2010, 9:11 AM
yeah a lot of money anyway who cares about reboot:

guys check out my cast for Astonishing X-Men when you had time

click on x




how much fox pay chris evans to play cap i don't remember

in our country 500,000 it's like billion of dollar
TANKGIRL - 7/5/2010, 9:14 AM
Haha, a day dude! Pimpin ain't cheap!
RorMachine - 7/5/2010, 9:15 AM
@ tea me too buddy! Whores and drugs! :D
Urban8er - 7/5/2010, 9:15 AM
"Hello Andrew.I've got good news for you. You've got the role! Even better,they're willing to pay you ONE SHINY NICKEL!"-Andrew's agent. LOL
scurvydog - 7/5/2010, 9:18 AM
im worried about this movie because of the writer. James Vanderbilt. He wrote THE LOSERS and that movie had a really bad story and some of the worst dialogues ive seen in the last few years. yes he did do the screenplay for zodiac but that was based on a novel.

majinlogan - 7/5/2010, 9:23 AM
I have an idea.. How about Marvel buys back Spidey rights!
THABATMAN - 7/5/2010, 9:23 AM
Ror@ lol yeah it took twice that to make me look this good....







:D
teabag - 7/5/2010, 9:23 AM
Man Tobey got paid way more for the first movie, then he got a big payday afterwards, but man talk about lowballing someone on this, they really are caring more about the sappy aspect of this than they should
claybo4131 - 7/5/2010, 9:26 AM
Maguire wasn't as unknown. Garfield gets to play Spider-man and be a millionaire in the process. Poor him.
fanboiii - 7/5/2010, 9:26 AM
Interesting.
Destroyer14 - 7/5/2010, 9:28 AM
Ha!!! Sony fill with bunch of greedy mofos. Well he gets to be famous I guess.
starscream4president - 7/5/2010, 9:29 AM
Whatever, I just hope the reboot gets Andrew all the recognition he deserves.
mindform - 7/5/2010, 9:36 AM
excelent... :)
darkvenian - 7/5/2010, 9:39 AM
It must cost a majority of his salary just to keep his hair so bouncy :P
teabag - 7/5/2010, 9:47 AM
im with Flames and Taboo
that's a lot of money n my opinion xD
Gotbatman - 7/5/2010, 9:49 AM
Gobatman@ Not when you look at Fuel prices today..






lol :D
teabag - 7/5/2010, 9:51 AM
@Bag-o-Tea, I can blow alot more in a weekend if you catch my drift ;)
CaptainAmerica - 7/5/2010, 9:58 AM
Damn, I know that's probably more than he's ever been paid before but what a measly sum! (especially when he gets home and converts it into £££'s, lol!) I'm looking forward to when we actually hear Garfield talk about taking the role...is he a fan of Spider-Man I wonder?
JoshW - 7/5/2010, 9:59 AM
$500 000 is cheap for a HOLLYWOOD movie like this, wtf is that why SONY got him?

JOSH @ Lets hope he's a fan man!

TEA @ LMAO!
LEEE777 - 7/5/2010, 10:01 AM
I really like the direction this reboot is going.

1) like Ror said, smaller budget may equal more focus on the story

2) Unknown actor that can act is a +, he has great opportunity to OWN this role.

3) I'm a big fan of Ultimate/Spectacular Spider-Man AND if they do as Ror suggested and reboot like The Incredible Hulk and pick up where Raimi left off we might get to see the Lizard. Finally.

@TankGirl were are you from?
valeriesghost - 7/5/2010, 10:22 AM
Cap@ I get ya and now i want ya lol :D
teabag - 7/5/2010, 10:24 AM
If the Movies does well he better Hike That Price Tag on Sony's Ass for a Sequel!
Kes - 7/5/2010, 10:28 AM
Time, as always, will reveal all.

I think the Lizard would be a great first villain because his motives will be close to Peter and they wont be blowing their deepest story lines right off the bat. It would be cool if both Eddie Brock (not Jr.) and Norman Osbourn are in the first one as semi important characters too, it'll change up the whole notion of these crazy bad guys just coming out of no where, and they wont have to make up rediculous excuses to connect these guys to Peter's past.
Ryguy88 - 7/5/2010, 10:31 AM
Now I see why they picked an unknown. Cheap [fricks]! Still a $hitload of money and he gets to be a superhero, so I don't feel sorry for him. That punk Maguire got paid millions and still did a pretty crappy Parker.


CaptainProg - 7/5/2010, 10:32 AM
@val...but why would they pick up off that SM3 joint...i think they are restarting from ground zero..:)

and they are paying this guy chicken shit...sucks cuz his resume is decent and he has been praised for his roles...but smaller budget? i mean we need proper cgi etc and effects for this film...so i hope it isnt a significantly smaller budget
Anil Rickly - 7/5/2010, 10:34 AM
The Budget will still be in the $150M range, it just wont push $300M like the last one did, largely because of the cast.
Ryguy88 - 7/5/2010, 10:40 AM
@Anil, you're right, 3 was total shit, but i was thinking with how successful TIH was in doing it, maybe the same would be true for Spidey and the reboot haters and the Spec/Ult fans would be happy. That's one of the reasons TIH worked was cause it gave the TV fans something to be happy about without throwing the original under the bus.

I also think Sony, from a business POV is smart, they know that Spidey is a guaranteed winner. All the fan boys are gonna show up and see (hopefully) a well told story with great talent on a MUCH smaller budget, they just increased their profit margin incredibly
valeriesghost - 7/5/2010, 11:01 AM
and my 3 year old just saw the above pick of spidey and pointed out the fact that "Spider-Mans hands are dirty. He needs to wash them" ;0)
valeriesghost - 7/5/2010, 11:03 AM
I'm wondering if they'll use some of the $ they're not paying Garfield and surround him with not only great special effects, but quality actors as well in the supporting cast.

I say Jason Isaacs for Norman Osbourne. This guy just oozes that character for me. Defoe was good in the 1st Spidey movie (not as GG mind you), but almost too recognizable a face to be the role, imo. I can't remember who said it, JoshW. maybe, but I could totally see Helen Mirren as May.

While they're at it, change the eyes on the mask. They are too triangular and big. I think they should look more like they do in any Alex Ross Spider-Man art.

Sony will be smart too if they include as many characters from the books even in minor roles, just like Spectacular SM did.

Good article ROR!
Eviltwin - 7/5/2010, 11:07 AM
this reboot SUCKS ! since when Parker is BRITISH ???? wow ! and then an older dude playing a teenager ?! Hollywood seems to have everything figured out hahahahaha
PoPcornDude - 7/5/2010, 11:09 AM
YOUR REBOOTING A FORMULA THAT WAS OK TO BEGIN WTH, AND GIVING IT AN ULTIMATES SPIN...............OKAAAAAY.
GUNSMITH - 7/5/2010, 11:25 AM
I think for the after-credits scene, the Venom symboite should be shown. I know it's a little soon, but I think it could work.
Destroyer14 - 7/5/2010, 11:25 AM
PopcornDude:Did you complain when Welsh actor Christian Bale was cast as American Bruce Wayne? If not,why is this any different?
Sweetre15 - 7/5/2010, 11:28 AM
taboo- sup were u been
flames809 - 7/5/2010, 11:29 AM
I would play Spidey for five thousand dollars.
Badmonkey - 7/5/2010, 11:32 AM
If memory serves me right after the success of Spider-Man 1, Tobey renegotiated his contract for more money. If they do Spider-Man 1 type money again with the reboot I bet this guy will redo his contract. Who knows, hope for the best.
Number21 - 7/5/2010, 11:33 AM
PoPcornDude: Wow, are you really complaining about that? Who gives a
shit if Garfield's British? As long as he puts on a convincing American accent, why should it matter? People find the most stupid reasons to bash the reboot.
InTylerWeTrust - 7/5/2010, 11:34 AM
@Destroyer14 It depends on when they get the Venom spin-off out. I would like to see an Eddie Brock cameo right before the Venom movie comes out. After the Venom movie, they could have a Spider-man and Venom movie. Then, Spider-man and Venom could split up into their own separate movies so they'd be like side by side stories. It's too soon though. They should start off with the Lizard and then show Dr. Connor studying the symbiote. They could even write it so Dr. Connor mixes the DNA of the symbiote with reptile DNA to regenerate his arm and mutate into the Lizard.
fanboiii - 7/5/2010, 11:48 AM
VENOM SPIN OFF IS A BAD IDEA ONLY IF YOU STILL USE TOPHER GRACE..

"BLUAHHH BLUAHHH I VONT TO SAUCK YOUR BLUAD...BLUAHHHHH"

GUNSMITH - 7/5/2010, 12:00 PM
yeah you know i like Topher Grace but man that venom shit in spidey3 was god awful. between emo Parker and frail looking Eddie Brock...i say make Brock Lesnar venom lol its just a joke but seriously Brock/venom is a huge bad guy and even stronger then webs is.
fanboy76 - 7/5/2010, 12:09 PM
Less than half the budget of the previous three films. A cast of unknowns. A reboot sending the gang back to high school for possibly another origin story...

Looks like Sony has as much faith in this reboot as most of us do. But the good news is, if it bombs the way I think it might, Sony will have to scrap any plans for a sequel, and in a few years, Spiderman will return to Marvel/Disney, where it belongs!
SkylerMystwood - 7/5/2010, 12:10 PM
Reason why Spider-Man Should Fail

1. An Unknown Actor who looks like an Idiot

2. Two Producers who are not only Senile but have Ruined alot of Marvel Movies (Avi Arad Especially he needs to be removed from the production and any other Marvel Adaptations)

3. The Directors only done ONE film and a list Of Completely stupid music videos

4. Its a REBOOT have we not forgot about PUNISHER war Zone and While the Incredible Hulk was a A Great Film with Norton we have Not yet Seen a Sequel or had any talks about him being in the Avengers

5. Personally i

ArrionShadow - 7/5/2010, 1:44 PM
5. Personally I believe Sam Raimi Could have redeemed himself If given a Chance to do Spiderman 4

6. Have you seen how low there going with the budget? This means less Spider-man and More wasted time

7. The pass of this film already seems rushed enough so the CGI will probably be rushed as well giving us a horrible view of Spiderman

8. SONY owns the rights to Spiderman, If Marvel Owned them we would have an awsome Spiderman and Possibly a cameo roll in the Avengers

9. The Marvel universe on Film Is never going to get any better if Different studios own the rights to these films, I want a film where all the characters have heard of each other this X-Men not knowing anything about the punisher, thor, the hulk, daredevil its all becoming ridiculous Only one studio should hold the rights to all the Marvel properties PERIOD

10. If its not Broke don't Fix it.
ArrionShadow - 7/5/2010, 1:51 PM
His haircut just s-u-c-k-s...
Cyanide - 7/5/2010, 2:30 PM
GUNSMITH @ Put that VENOM away dude!!!

DOMINIC PURCELL is VENOM!



: D
LEEE777 - 7/5/2010, 2:33 PM
they are just covering their asses
Marvelous1 - 7/5/2010, 2:46 PM
If you want Spider-man to return to Marvel I suggest getting on Facebook and any other social networking site and tell everyone, I mean everyone you know, NOT to go to the new Spider-man film. This way, when it crashes and burns, they will probably hand it to Marvel on a silver platter. All I can say is wait for a trailer and decide for yourself.
Timerider84 - 7/5/2010, 3:12 PM
What does back-end mean? Is that like commission for the movie?
deraj36 - 7/5/2010, 3:30 PM
charlee sheen makes four times as much money for a single episode of two and a half men.

[frick] the reboot
grif - 7/5/2010, 3:31 PM
Oh so that's the reason they get rid of the old crew, they became too expensive. Yeah FRICK THE REBOOT!!!!!!!!!
AngelAragiel - 7/5/2010, 3:41 PM

Obi - 7/5/2010, 3:41 PM
Hell to the NO for topher grace as venom. He butchered the role more so then raimi did. 100% agree with Lee that Dominic Purcell is VENOM!!!!
Ven0m - 7/5/2010, 6:13 PM
p.s. You get what you pay for!!! Bunch of young shitty actors! This movie is gonna fail so hard it might end the world before 2012 gets the chance.
Ven0m - 7/5/2010, 6:14 PM
im gonna sit back and wait for more info on this movie. right now it could go either way. purcell could do venom. id like to see william fichtner play jj jameson.maybe give the role more drive and fierceness. can show more hatred toward spidey.jk did good with what he had to work with, jj needs to be less comedic
squirt - 7/5/2010, 6:33 PM
i think they listed the budget to be around 80 million. a lot of that was actors salaries
squirt - 7/5/2010, 6:34 PM
500,000 that not alot for a reboot maybe a million
Marvel Rules - 7/5/2010, 6:35 PM
i'm surprised they'd only give him that.. but ahhh well i guess i don't care that much... although it stupid to have a 26 year old in high school!
otherside - 7/5/2010, 7:07 PM
@SuperKal: There is just no civility in you is there, you little troll?
NERO - 7/5/2010, 7:48 PM
great sony pay him 500,000 so he wpnt return for a sequal... idiots
wade1210 - 7/5/2010, 9:21 PM
hahaha I thought they were going to be tighter on the purse strings with the new Spider-Man film. I specifically remember that being one of the main things people were sayings.
SoulAllFlush - 7/6/2010, 5:15 AM
he's clearly overpaid ...
McLovin - 7/6/2010, 9:31 AM
@ SkylerMystwood - EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!
McLovin - 7/6/2010, 9:36 AM
I support almost all CBMs, but this crap I will not be spending one single dollar on.

I'm not saying I won't eventually watch it, but I won't be spending my money to support it, in hopes that many others will do the same. This way the movie bombs and Sony gives up on the franchise so that Marvel gets Spidey back in time for Avengers 2.
McLovin - 7/6/2010, 9:39 AM
Boycott Spiderman tween reboot! [frick] the reboot!
Ven0m - 7/6/2010, 1:13 PM
sweetre15: I never really like batman, so whoever was playing the character didn't mean anything to me, if I remember the worst part of TDK was bale himself ! he coul've used some ricola hahaha.
of course matters what nationality is the actor !! would you be happier if an foreigner would've played Cap. America ????
sutpid reason to bash the reboot ??? Oh yeah right... I bet you're happy with Andrew just like the rest of us !
PoPcornDude - 7/6/2010, 1:41 PM
@ArrionShadow

Indeed
Overcross - 7/6/2010, 5:47 PM
[INSERT CAPTION HERE]

Spider-Man Reboot Payment Manip By EditNinja
EditNinja - 7/7/2010, 3:52 AM

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.