100 Days of Superheroes- Day 60: Superman Returns

100 Days of Superheroes- Day 60: Superman Returns 100 Days of Superheroes- Day 60: Superman Returns

Unlike Batman, He's actually returning.

Review Opinion
By ToDandy - Apr 26, 2012 10:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Superman




Trailer:



“There are only three things people like to read. Catastrophe, sex, and Superman!”


Unlike Batman Returns the word “returns” here actually has some significance to the actual film. Director Brian Singer left his X-Men series to pursue the personal dream of directing a Superman film in the likeness of Richard Donner. The unfortunate reality though is that Superman Returns is far more effective as a tribute than it is as a stand alone film.

The movie opens to the classic opening from the original four films. After having not heard or seen it since this summer, I have to admit hearing that iconic score again did bring a kind of smile to my face. From there we see Superman return to earth after having been gone for five years in search of his home world. But nothing is as he remembers it. Lois is married with a child, Lex Luthor has dropped off the radar, and the world has moved on without him.



The film is best within those parameters and it is a great central concept that takes Superman back to his roots from the original film where he feels alone and out of place. That’s not the only thing that feels like the original film, though. In fact so many things are snatched from Richard Donner that it’s borderline thievery.

It has been almost twenty years since the previous film so this loose sequel has no other choice than to replace the original cast with look a-likes and impersonators. First on the list of credits is Brandon Routhe. Now he was far from terrible and did the best he could with the direction given to him, but I never got the sense he was playing HIS version of Superman. No, Routh was just playing Christopher Reeve playing Superman and unfortunately did not have the leeway or naturalism to pull the roll off in as fun of a manner as his predecessor. His Clark Kent is particularly boring and it is never really believable that anyone would have a hard time seeing who he is. He also really doesn't have the build for Superman either, even if his face looks like Reeve's. Routhe unfortunately is kind of a skinny but well toned guy. Not exactly what you think of for Superman.



Meanwhile Margo Kidder is replaced with boring stone face Kate Brosworth. She lacks Kidder’s energy, personality, but most importantly her comedy. Sure she may be way more attractive but couldn’t be duller. But the main problem with the two leads is not so much their performance individually but a lack of chemistry of any kind. Kidder and Reeves were a blast to watch when on screen together. They were funny and romantic at the same time. Here they just kind of stare at one another with blank expressions.

The only real- well I won’t say better- but equal actor to the original was a great casting of Kevin Spacey as Lex Luthor. He plays a much more menacing villain than Gene Hackman’s version of the character. The only time his performance is dragged down is when….again…..he is directed to play the roll comedic like Hackman. These parts just feel a little forced and less natural than when Spacey is just doing his own thing and being one helluva good Lex.



Yet there is no denying that Luthor’s plan in this film is even more ludicrous and ridiculous than the previous films (and that’s saying a lot). Here he wants to use magic crystals he stole from Superman to create a new continent and everyone will have to pay him to live there after the rest of the world floods. I’m sorry but with only three henchmen and a helicopter, what is stopping a nation from blowing him up and just taking the land? When sinking California starts sounding like a more viable option….you know you’ve got a problem.

To make matters all the worst the film builds up to a very lackluster and roundabout conclusion which is so simple, yet so illogical and senseless that I just stop caring around the end. It is just pretty incoherent when you consider what happened minutes before with Superman getting his ass handed to him just from standing on the kryptonite island.



So the film is definitely not without it’s faults when it comes to the plot and characterization. The film also is heavy handed and overly melodramatic at times. One of the things I applauded the Donner film(s) for was not taking Superman too seriously and injecting a lot of comedy into it. This film tries for a little comedy but the majority of what’s there falls flat.

Still the film has some tremendously good scenes in it such as the bittersweet flight with Lois, Lex beating Superman to a pulp, and the return scene that was so extravagant that it made you feel the same way as the people in the film. “He’s Back! (especially after being gone from the big screen for so long)” Unfortunately you then realize all these great scene are crammed between slow, boring conversations that lack any real momentum.



So in the end Superman Returns is a mixed bag. The characters and plot are kind of lackluster but it has an interesting concept at its core. Despite not having a physical foe to fight the effects are still pretty cool and entertaining to watch (though admittedly get a little cartoonish at times). Though at times you do wish Superman had something else to do besides just catching falling objects. It just lacks the power and chemistry of the original leads and the sense of adventure and fun that made the first two so memorable.


FINAL RATING: 5/10- (50%)









Previous DAY 59- X-Men The Last Stand
http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/100superherodays/news/?a=58572







NOTE: Polls used later in ranking so PLEASE VOTE! if you have seen it.
SUPERMAN Star Isabela Merced On Joining The DCU As Hawkgirl: It Sounds Like Hot Girl
Related:

SUPERMAN Star Isabela Merced On Joining The DCU As Hawkgirl: "It Sounds Like Hot Girl"

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Shares New S Logo - But What Could It Mean?
Recommended For You:

SUPERMAN Director James Gunn Shares New "S" Logo - But What Could It Mean?

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

marvel72
marvel72 - 4/26/2012, 10:27 AM
this was the only great scene of the whole movie & it was very early on,i hope the new film is better with more scenes like this.

BlueMex
BlueMex - 4/26/2012, 10:44 AM
the catching the airplane scene , awesome!
JDUKE25
JDUKE25 - 4/26/2012, 11:18 AM
Even the airplane scene was lackluster. It looked so incredibly fake. There was so much CG in that movie. Gave it a 2/10, only because some of the music was good, like the score when he's falling back to earth. Other than that, s#it movie.
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/26/2012, 11:55 AM
news from the year 2095 a.d.:

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from the year 2153 a.d.:

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from the year 6,987 y.o.o.l.o. (year of our lord obama):

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from the europa colony orbiting Juptier in 7,009 y.o.o.l.o. :

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from the sentient energy beings in the delta-quandrant in 8,089 y.o.o.l.o. :

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from the cave paintings of the primate-like creatures evolving on a tiny moon in another galaxy, approximately 10,867 y.o.o.l.o. :

-a NEW article about superman returns sucking.

news from a recently discovered message embedded in the D.N.A. of the sentient plant species of planet X:

guess what? superman returns sucks!
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/26/2012, 11:57 AM
in more RECENT films, cecile b. demille has finished his epic "ten commandments" featuring charlton heston and yul brenner.

looks like "talkies" are here to stay!
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/26/2012, 4:17 PM
lighten up there, Shakespeare.
relax.

by the time "man of steel" is released SR will be seven years old. since even BEFORE it was released the online-nerd community has ripped it to shreds.
can't go a week! w/out someone going on at length about why "it sucks" "underwhelming" "disappointing'' and so on.
it's old news.

moron?
jesus- either grow a sense of humor/humility or switch to decaf.
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/26/2012, 7:44 PM
no.
wrong.
(maybe i should say : "wrrrroooooooonnnnnng")


i DID read your article.
i did. more than once.

save your finger muscles and don;t type a response when you don't like a responce to your article.

i "GET" that it is a series of articles. it is also an article on NOTHING new.
you have every right, and you have exercised the right, to voice an opinion on ANY film or ANY subject at ANY time.
no one says otherwise.

but that you seem to think an expression from YOU means that we all sit back in utter awe is vanity.
YOU say what YOU want.
ANYone ELSE says what THEY want.
THAT is freedom of speech.

YOU can write all the articles you want. doesn't mean the rest of us have to be quiet.
i never even attacked you personally or disagreed with the merit or your article- i simply spoofed the fact that SR is approaching a decade old- and that carving up all it's "flaws" is old hat. simply an observation.

seriously- it's a flawed movie- even fans of it agree. but it's OLD news. i was KIDDING. !!!!!! KIDDING!
god! btw- 50% is a failing grade. that's an "F". so don;t act like i "didn't read" youur article. i DID.

maybe YOU should save finger muscles. criticizing superman returns has been a nerd-cause-celeb for 7 years now. NOTHING in your article is new.
you can say what you want, but that doesn't mean you don't get a rebuttal.

i never called you a petulant "name" (moron)
the fact that SR criticism ITSELF is so pervasive is unintentionally hilarious anyway.

REPEAT:
i DID read your article.
it IS the SAME review i've read hundreds of times.
you can write whatever you like.
this IS a blog, and people WILL respond.
your observations aren't "wrong".
in ten years people will STILL be rewriting the same article.
in a hundred years....
my comments are NOT a personal attack- just an observation on the "consensus" of popular SR opinion (that won't let it go).

carry on.
Ghostt
Ghostt - 4/26/2012, 9:31 PM
@longcommentguy

revisiting and reviewing old CBMs is one of the things we do on here. I like reading reviews of older CBMs, to see how a movie has aged.

only Brian Singer could be this upset with the article....wait a minute..is that you, Singer
Scooby
Scooby - 4/27/2012, 5:07 AM
wedontdie
wedontdie - 4/27/2012, 6:29 AM
@Jorl5150 this isn't school grading... 50% here means that the one who gives it 50% means he likes at least 50% of it. and if I were to write this article about Superman Returns in a couple years even after Man of Steel comes out I wouldn't just straight out say it sucked. I would state that some how as stupid as most people thought superman returns was... it sure as hell still worked as a movie because it had a great structure. maybe the plot of the movie was not to your liking but you would also be stating that the plot for the first Superman is bad because both plots are almost the same. But Superman Returns followed the structure of story telling from stating the problems of the characters in the beginning, having the rising action, having the turn of events, having a villain that was good at what he does, and having the climax at the end. Somehow Superman Returns did this well.
JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/27/2012, 11:34 AM
oh, for starters i DO like "SR". i really do. it was underwhelming the first time i saw it as i had entirely unrealistic expectations.

in time, i grow to love it for what it is, as opposed to what i thought it was going to be.

i don;t have any problem at all with people reviewing and revisiting vintage topics- it's just that in the case of "SR" there is a pervasive, almost pathological internet campaign against it. on every superhero/sci-fi/comic book site it's always being panned by smallville fans, marvel fans, etc etc.

it's actually weird and kinda funny and i was merely pointing out that out of nowhere- on a section devoted to superman with most of the focus on "MOS" and "new 52" it pops up again.

as a fan of SR (to a degree), sour/negative reviews are like a bad penny. it's always turning up, and always will i guess.

JorL5150
JorL5150 - 4/27/2012, 11:35 AM
@ghost-

LOL!
sorry for the long winded reply. i tend to get "chatty" after a couple beers.
Boogie138
Boogie138 - 4/28/2012, 8:16 AM
I would watch x-men 3 over superman returns any day of the week. and i am a dc fan
cwatts22
cwatts22 - 4/28/2012, 3:41 PM
I loved this film! The only complaint that I had was that the originals were set in the late 70's, early 80's, and then this film picks up five years after that - in the mid 2000s.
AZSuperman
AZSuperman - 5/2/2012, 4:36 PM
I gave it a 10. Why because it's SUPERMAN MOVIE.


It's like pizza and sex, even if it's bad it's still good. Now I'm a loyal CR-Superman fan as I grew up when they all came out, but Brandon did an excellent job at Superman.

The story sucked and there wasn't much "Super" but again it's SUPERMAN movie.

MetropolisMarvel
MetropolisMarvel - 5/8/2012, 4:51 PM
Superman Returns should have starred Tom Welling, Erica Durance, and Michael Rosenbaum.

Man of Steel should have starred Tom Welling, Erica Durance, John Schneider & Annette O'Toole.

They've been practicing/mastering the roles for the past decade.
TexasAvenger
TexasAvenger - 5/8/2012, 10:40 PM
I couldn't even get past the first 20 minutes of this movie. It utterly sucked.
ThunderKat
ThunderKat - 5/14/2012, 5:22 PM
Good write up!
I do agree to an extent that it is unnecessary since (it seems) the majority here dislike this movie.
You could suffice to say that just like "Superman III [and] IV," 'Returns' did nothing for the genre nor the Superman mythos.

I await your next article!
mokf
mokf - 5/22/2012, 7:38 PM
Boring Superman with another extremely boring movie, Reeves at least had charisma. lame lame lame.
View Recorder