"You Can't Make a Bad Movie": Sony CEO Acknowledges That The Bar Has Been Raised For Marvel Adaptations

"You Can't Make a Bad Movie": Sony CEO Acknowledges That The Bar Has Been Raised For Marvel Adaptations

Sony Pictures CEO Ravi Ahuja has admitted that the bar has been raised with its Marvel movies, meaning the studio can no longer deliver mediocre efforts in exchange for guaranteed box office success...

By JoshWilding - Sep 04, 2025 11:09 AM EST
Filed Under: Spider-Man
Source: The Wrap

Despite agreeing to share Spider-Man with Marvel Studios after The Amazing Spider-Man 2 served as an abrupt end to that franchise, Sony Pictures decided to forge ahead with its own slate of Marvel movies. 

It's hard to blame the studio, as the genre had become a guaranteed money-maker. That was apparent from Venom grossing $856 million in 2018 despite largely negative reviews. However, with Avi Arad calling the shots, Sony hasn't exactly delivered quality comic book adaptations. 

Venom: Let There Be Carnage and Venom: The Last Dance were middling efforts in the eyes of many critics and fans, but the likes of Morbius, Madame Web, and Kraven the Hunter were outright disasters (oddly, the animated Spider-Verse movies rank among the best superhero movies ever). 

Sony, along with Warner Bros.' DCEU titles and Marvel Studios' flood of MCU content, has contributed to the "superhero fatigue" issue plaguing Hollywood. Now, Sony Pictures CEO Ravi Ahuja has acknowledged that the bar has been raised when it comes to delivering a successful Marvel blockbuster. 

"There was a period of time where anything superhero was almost guaranteed to do well," he said. "I think [the bar] for superhero movies, it was relatively low. In the mid-2010s, pretty much all of them would do incredible business, but now even superhero movies have to have a degree of originality."

"They have to add something different. They have to have [n] emotional connection. They have to be cultural events that can be marketed that way," Ahuja added, expressing optimism that Spider-Man: Brand New Day will do well for Sony.

Still, he's always aware that "you can’t make a bad movie," suggesting the studio has learned its lesson from the diminishing returns of its previous Marvel output. The fact is, Sony has access to a spectacular roster of characters, and if they're handled well (imagine a movie led by Spider-Man's clone, Ben Reilly), we could be in store for some amazing results. 

Addressing Hollywood's overall struggles, Ahuja later said, "It’s a bit of marketing, but it’s making it an event that people want to go out to theaters and watch together as well. That’s always been the case. I think it’s just even tougher than it used to be."

Sony has put its Marvel movies on hold after Kraven the Hunter flopped, though Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse is on the way, as is a Spider-Noir TV series. Will the studio finally start taking advantage of its spider-themed heroes? 

That's the hope, though whether Sony can be trusted not to tarnish the "Spider-" brand is hard to say. If one thing should be clear to Ahuja, it's that Arad needs to go...

SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY - Come Get Your First  FULL Look At Tom Holland’s Amazing New Suit!
Related:

SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY - Come Get Your First FULL Look At Tom Holland’s Amazing New Suit!

TRON: ARES Delivers A Thrill-A-Minute Trailer, Featurettes, And New Posters As Tickets Go On Sale
Recommended For You:

TRON: ARES Delivers A Thrill-A-Minute Trailer, Featurettes, And New Posters As Tickets Go On Sale

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
gambgel
gambgel - 9/4/2025, 11:43 AM
the fact that sony owns ALL the Spiderman characters, have done A LOT of marvel movies, and yet Holland Spiderman hasnt met any single hero or iconic villain from the comics (not counting Tobey versions)....... yiiiiikes.

Venom, Kraven, Spiderwoman, Spidergwen, Black Cat, Kingpin, Miles Morales, Silk....

what a LAME studio or studios deal.
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 11:55 AM
@gambgel - It would be much easier for them to introduce those characters in the Marvel Spiderman movies and then have them in separate Sony movies.

It's like their deal with Marvel prevents that, but Vulture had a cameo in Venom, so wtf.

Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 12:03 PM
@Usernametaken - or was the vulture cameo in morbius? I don't know and honestly don't care.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 9/4/2025, 1:49 PM
@gambgel - Sony don't actualy own the original Spider-Woman, Drew was never a character in any Spider-man comics, however they control all the spider related hero names (as insisted on a clause so Marvel couldn't just create new Spidermen that were mutants instead of bitten or whatever). Was why they created a new Peter Parker origin type 'Jess' for the Spiderverse as couldn't use the Hydra/AoS related original Jessica cos Marvel still owns her (just can't call her Spider-Woman when suited up).

However, yeh it is down to Sony limiting what toys Disney can play with why Holland hasn't face most his iconic villains as wanted to use them themselves, Kingpin they couldn't prevent Marvel using for DD as there are exception clauses specific to him. I'm sure Disney would have used more of them if Sony didn't have the power to prevent them even in Spider-man films.
dragon316
dragon316 - 9/4/2025, 2:14 PM
@gambgel - not like marvel has done goood job some there characters and villians taskmaster , kang , iron man three manderian , silver surfer , modok , and some others
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 9/4/2025, 11:45 AM
You also need to know your target demographic and not make movies with characters no one is interested in. Exceptions certainly apply but in order to cross over into the mainstream, those exceptions need to be even better than an esablished property. Most likely the nerds are going to be your word of mouth so not insulting them would be a good start.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/4/2025, 11:49 AM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - Disney decided to take traditionally “boys” IP’s and market them to females and it didn’t work. It’s like trying to make Barbie a mens brand. Maybe you’ll get a few, but you’ll lose your original audience without gaining a new one
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 9/4/2025, 11:56 AM
@Bucky74 - exactly
dragon316
dragon316 - 9/4/2025, 2:21 PM
@CreateNowSlpL8r - not start fight what’s reason for fantastic four mostly fans are watching it not general audience what they ware with liko and Stitch , how to train your dragon , Superman , who you have in movie is not guaranteed be success make movie goood and entertaining you have fun movie to watch you have thunderbolts and transformers one situation all over again 9 out of 10 fans will like movies but it will mostly be fans see movies if you can’t get NEW fans in see your movie then it will suck or bull luck it make profit.,

Transformers sucked only older fans saw it not new fans and new fans grew up with bay version not g1 older fans hate it I point this out it’s true new fans and new fans are little kids add to list grew up with live action not cartoons g1

?si=H7q6Hq7DDXvJynnD

?si=GO-iDhLITA7BnumN
CreateNowSlpL8r
CreateNowSlpL8r - 9/5/2025, 2:15 PM
@dragon316 - Im not sure what the question is. Are you asking why the GA didn't watch Fantasic Four?
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/4/2025, 11:45 AM
It’s simple really. Make a fun, emotional and entertaining film that remains close to the source material without injecting activism and modern political while respecting your audience no matter what their beliefs. It’s like they intentionally want to lose money and have no idea how to make blockbuster films anymore
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/4/2025, 11:46 AM
@Bucky74 - “politics”
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 9/4/2025, 1:18 PM
@Bucky74 - it does seem intentional at this point. They can't be this obtuse.
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 11:50 AM
Oh boy, did he really say all that? Did the Sony Pictures CEO really said the most obvious f*cking thing about comic book movies?

Can someone tell this dingus that this doens't just apply to CBMs, but any blockbuster, movie franchise or sequels of successful movies?

Did he also admit that Sony didn't give a shit about releasing bad CBMs because they thought the public were dumbasses who would pay for anything with a superhero in it?


ffs. I am amazed that this guy is a CEO...
TheLobster
TheLobster - 9/4/2025, 11:57 AM
@Usernametaken - pretty much! Insane to say on record right? What a [frick]ing clown..
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 9/4/2025, 12:01 PM
@Usernametaken - The most unqualified executives in these studios always fail upwards
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 12:04 PM
@Bucky74 - Backstabbers are the ones who tends to climb the ladder of success.
movieguy18
movieguy18 - 9/4/2025, 12:07 PM
@Usernametaken - PREACH. Is it just me or is PR the worst it’s ever been?
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 9/4/2025, 1:20 PM
@Usernametaken - yep, he said what they all think. We're all just too stupid to know the difference between Infinity War and Morbius.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 9/4/2025, 3:27 PM
@Usernametaken - Plenty of studios admit to the mistakes they've made in the past. I've lost count of how many times a new CEO from WB has admitted to the mistakes made by their predecessors. Even Disney has done it.

This guy actually worked for Fox, then Disney, and now Sony, mostly in the television departments. He only became the CEO of Sony Pictures this year, after the failure of all of Sony's past Spider-Man spin-off movies. So, his calling out the previous movies as bad just to make a quick buck is not necessarily a bad thing.
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 3:30 PM
@JacobsLadder - a $1,880,898,793 difference at the B.O. says we did though.

Man, I need to watch IW/Endgame again. Those movies are so fun.
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 9/4/2025, 3:51 PM
@Usernametaken - oh shut up, a ton of terrible cbm movies are beloved because people give them a pass.
Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 4:22 PM
@Razorface1 -

It's okay to make a bad movie when you at least try to make a good one, those can be loved.

But to say "we didn't care about the quality, because we thought the public didn't", that's something you don't want to hear from a studio.

Usernametaken
Usernametaken - 9/4/2025, 4:26 PM
@SpiderParker - Usually they things like "we rushed production, we started too many projects, the studio heads interfered too much, or not enough etc".

But "we didn't care about the quality of the product because anything with a superhero in it was making money" is a crazy thing to say.
SpiderParker
SpiderParker - 9/4/2025, 5:27 PM
@Usernametaken - They did rush production, and the studio did interfere. He wasn't working on those movies, and no one sets out to make bad movies. DC and Fox, and even Sony, expected superhero movies to make money after Marvel catapulted the genre. They, like others and even Marvel on occasion recently, didn't put enough effort into quality. He is simply saying what we all think.

His comment isn't just about Sony but about the entire genre. The fact that it also pertains to his own company doesn't make it any less true. For him, it's not a matter of 'we' but of 'they,' as he never worked on those movies and only became the CEO this year. Calling out the mistakes of a past regime is nothing new. I mean, Trump does it almost every day, even when the claims aren't valid or the mistakes were his own. Water is wet.
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 9/5/2025, 7:07 AM
@Usernametaken - and yet, people give them a pass for not trying.
TheLobster
TheLobster - 9/4/2025, 11:56 AM
LOL this dumb POS literally said the quiet part out loud haha

I want Sony to continue flopping with anything that’s not Spider-Man MCU related so they eventually give up and sell the rights back at a somewhat reasonable price because [frick] THESE IDIOTS. They struck gold by taking advantage of Marvel’s financial weakness back in the 90’s and they’ve been printing money from it since. Absolute capitalist bastards that have no creativity or love for film and that goes the most to those two assholes known as Avi Arad and Amy Pascal.
Ironbot
Ironbot - 9/4/2025, 11:57 AM
Big words coming from the people who are currently holding Spider Man hostage at this point and make shitty villain centered movies.
AnthonyVonGeek
AnthonyVonGeek - 9/4/2025, 11:59 AM
"you can’t make a bad movie,"?
User Comment Image

User Comment Image
User Comment Image
User Comment Image

MGSSnake1988
MGSSnake1988 - 9/4/2025, 11:59 AM
What if Sony didn't interfere with Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 3 and the next trilogy starting with Spider-Man 4 all become box-office juggernauts?

Or X-Men 3 with Keanu Reeves as Gambit becomes a successful thing?

The 2000's comic book film lineup is really something special and nostalgic.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 9/4/2025, 11:59 AM
Sooo not one person in that board room had the EASIEST idea which is to use them in the next Spider-Man trilogy! Venom had diminishing returns, everything else was a flop. Those characters deserved to be in Spider-Man movies. And I bet you a million dollars who came up with these ideas. [frick] AVI ARAD!


Thank you.
TheVisionary25
TheVisionary25 - 9/4/2025, 12:04 PM
Well to be fair , no one sets out to make a bad film because it would be a waste of time & resources for everyone involved , it just is something that happens which can suck but that’s life.

Anyway he is right though in that you do need to market these films as events again because it’s either those movies or ones that appeal to kids/families that are doing well right now at the B.O…

There’s no shortage of content right now out there so your movie needs to stand out in some way I feel to be “worthy” of peoples time & money because if it doesn’t then you could sooner then later just check it out on streaming on your own time.

In regards to Sony , I do hope if Spider-Noir is well received and does good that they can perhaps do other spider themed heroes as live action films and just leave the villains to Marvel Studios so they could use them for the Holland films!!.
Laridian
Laridian - 9/4/2025, 12:06 PM
"From now on... we're only making movies that don't suck." Well... congratulations for pulling your head out of your ass, I guess. lol
massdeath
massdeath - 9/4/2025, 12:08 PM
It turns out you can’t make a bad movie.

Just remember this clown is getting paid millions of dollars as a studio head to come to this brilliant realization.
asherman93
asherman93 - 9/4/2025, 3:29 PM
@massdeath - "It turns out you can't make a bad movie."
*laughs in Venom 2018 and most of Bayformers*
grif
grif - 9/4/2025, 12:10 PM
"There was a period of time where anything superhero was almost guaranteed to do well,"

throw anything out there and they will pay for it.

what a shitty company

MisterBones
MisterBones - 9/4/2025, 12:31 PM
What a MORRON
blackandyellow
blackandyellow - 9/4/2025, 12:46 PM
@MisterBones -

User Comment Image
MisterBones
MisterBones - 9/4/2025, 1:55 PM
@blackandyellow -

User Comment Image
thedrudo
thedrudo - 9/4/2025, 1:00 PM
Tells you everything you need to know when they openly admit it didn’t matter what they created before because business was good.
1 2

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder