Speculation Mounts That THUNDERBOLTS* Could End Up Being A DARK AVENGERS Movie

Speculation Mounts That THUNDERBOLTS* Could End Up Being A DARK AVENGERS Movie Speculation Mounts That THUNDERBOLTS* Could End Up Being A DARK AVENGERS Movie

With the asterisk in the Thunderbolts* title generating speculation and wild theories among fans, one intriguing theory suggests the "Thunderbolts" name is a cover for the Dark Avengers. Check it out...

By JoshWilding - Apr 14, 2024 06:04 AM EST
Filed Under: Thunderbolts

Talking at CinemaCon earlier this week, Marvel Studios President Kevin Feige confirmed the asterisk in Thunderbolts*' title is significant but won't be something they'll talk about until after the movie's release. 

Needless to say, speculation has gone into overdrive. We've wondered for a while whether the team is named after President Thaddeus "Thunderbolt" Ross. Many fans have since doubled down on that after Captain America: Brave New World footage showed the General pressuring Sam Wilson into assembling a new team of Avengers. 

Theories range from the "Thunderbolts" name being an ironic nod to the President after he likely transforms into Red Hulk to the team we've seen in concept art not being the real Thunderbolts (instead, they'd be a decoy team or a Task Force X-like group meant to die in battle). 

However, the most compelling theory is that Thunderbolts* ends with the revelation that this team is, in fact, the MCU's Dark Avengers. 

The Sentry's presence may confirm that, and once the likes of Bucky and Yelena Belova are taken out of play, then we could end up with a villainous team of Avengers which counts the likes of U.S. Agent and Ghost among its ranks. Crucially, they'd be controlled by the U.S. Government and Val, a far cry from past iterations. 

Here are some of the most compelling theories we've seen shared online...

Confirmed cast members for Thunderbolts* include Julia Louis-Dreyfus as Valentina Allegra de Fontaine, Florence Pugh as Yelena Boleva, Sebastian Stan as Bucky Barnes, David Harbour as Red Guardian, Wyatt Russell as U.S. Agent, Hannah John-Kamen as Ghost, and Olga Kurylenko as Taskmaster.

Recently, Geraldine Viswanathan replaced Ayo Edebiri in an undisclosed role, while Lewis Pullman has taken over as The Sentry following Steve Yeun's shock departure from the movie. Both he and Edebiri are said to have left due to scheduling issues.

Written by Eric Pearson, Lee Sung Jin, and Joanna Calo, and directed by Jake Schreier, Thunderbolts* is currently set to be released in theaters on May 2, 2025.

THUNDERBOLTS* Star Olga Kurylenko Teases Her Return As Taskmaster With New BTS Photo
Related:

THUNDERBOLTS* Star Olga Kurylenko Teases Her Return As Taskmaster With New BTS Photo

THUNDERBOLTS* Set Photos Reveal A First Look At Ghost's New Costume And Glimpse Of Yelena Belova
Recommended For You:

THUNDERBOLTS* Set Photos Reveal A First Look At Ghost's New Costume And Glimpse Of Yelena Belova

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3 4
Jaspion
Jaspion - 4/14/2024, 6:24 AM
Ok.
DravenCorvis
DravenCorvis - 4/14/2024, 6:34 AM
Needless to say, but I'm guessing this is baseless speculation that'll end up in disappointment for a vocal minority - like Mephisto in WandaVision.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 7:54 AM
@DravenCorvis - Probably but those going with Dark Avengers likely are not those who read any comics and just going off google searches and basing their theoretical name on an anti-Avengers one rather than a source accurate(ish) team which is still an anti-Avengers one like Masters of Evil (that made themselves out to be the new hero team to help protect the world when the Avengers were declared dead in the comics under the name of Thunderbolts).

End of the day the only character we know is in the film that was at one point part of a Dark Aveners team (under that name) is U.S.Agent and the only others in one iteration or another of the DA's who have been sort of introduced somewhere in the MCU has been Skaar in a brief end scene, Bullseye & Luke Cage in Netflix and an alternate universe Osborne who was sent back to his own Earth non of whom have even been rumored to be in the film yet.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/14/2024, 9:40 AM
@Apophis71 - There could be some basis to this though. The * implies a potential name change. And perhaps Marvel Studios is going with the Dark Avengers as the next team. If you look at the current MCU and all the projects, They are all team ups. Daredevil & Punisher, Deadpool & Wolverine, Fantastic 4, and others. So it seems they are pushing for micro teams to have unite for Secret Wars and The Dark Avengers to be a covert Avengers task force full of Anti-Heroes. Wouldn't surprise me if they recruit The Punisher.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 9:48 AM
@SonOfAGif - Also think they will be wanting to setup villain teams, not just hero ones for secret wars, just feel with the character they have on the board and in the movie masters of Evil reveal makes a lot more sense than Dark Avengers would.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/14/2024, 9:52 AM
@Apophis71 - If they do Masters of Evil they definitely need Hela back.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 10:03 AM
@SonOfAGif - Would love Hela back at some point, however don't recall her ever being a member of Masters of Evil, not that I am against adding characters onto teams that never have been before anyway just unaware of that connection.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 4/14/2024, 10:17 AM
@DravenCorvis - yeah these are just theories the writer found on Tumblr or some idiots Patreon
LSHF
LSHF - 4/14/2024, 11:04 AM
@DravenCorvis - Yes, these types of clickbait articles don't help the readers.
Razorface1
Razorface1 - 4/14/2024, 12:52 PM
@SonOfAGif - they really dont.
SonOfAGif
SonOfAGif - 4/14/2024, 12:56 PM
@Apophis71 - To replace Loki since he's holding the Multiverse
dagenspear
dagenspear - 4/14/2024, 1:13 PM
@DravenCorvis - What about the disappointment from them purposefully misleading the audience, like with Pietro from WandaVision?
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 1:41 PM
@SonOfAGif - Fair enough although don't recall Loki being a member either, lol, I know Enchantress was and a Cyborg clone of Thor but then not read all of the comics with Dark Avengers in so... :D The biggest problem is as far as I know Osborn was in charge of every version of them and don't think Disney has any rights to use him outside of Spider-man films without doing additional side deals with Sony.
StSteven
StSteven - 4/14/2024, 4:22 PM
@SonOfAGif @Apophis71 - I agree with you guys that this could be an interesting way for them to go. I mean, rosters aside, the concepts of the Dark Avengers and Thunderbolts are not THAT far apart, and probably not far enough apart that it would make sense for Marvel to differentiate them as 2 separate entities (at least the GA might be like "Didn't we see this already"). So "Thunderbolts*" might serve as an origin story of sorts for the Dark Avengers (which could be the title of a potential sequel to this movie). Not necessarily setting up an evil team, but more like a black ops team kinda like X-Force but controlled by the US government. Basically what Ross has been wanting since "CA:CW".

Keep in mind, we now know that Ross asks Sam to create a new Avengers team in "CA:BNW" and it could happen that when Ross says that he wants a government controlled team to do secret/black ops missions at their behest Sam refuses (like in "CA:CW") so Ross goes to Val to have her put together the team, all of which makes sense (to me at least). If that ends up being the case this could be a considerably more interesting movie than it initially seemed.
StSteven
StSteven - 4/14/2024, 4:27 PM
@SonOfAGif @Apophis71 - Also I'll add that even if this first iteration of the Thunderbolts/Dark Avengers doesn't quite line up with the more traditional roster of the DAs, if they do do a "DA" sequel, then they could add more team members that line up more closely with the Comic DAs because by then they'll have more characters inn the MCU to pull from, such as Bullseye, Red Hulk, etc. So basically, they'll probably kill off a couple of the TBs by the end of the movie, but replace them with a more comic-accurate line-up in "DA".
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 4:42 PM
@StSteven - Wherever this is all going do think this is only the start of it and likely the only film called Thunderbolts we'll get. The reason being this specific roster is perfect for only certain types of things as basicaly a bunch of mostly spies and assassins. To elevate it to any real Avenger level team needs more than just that, you need your Thor types, Iron Man type and Hulk types to become any form of Avengers, new or Dark. If however this is an acquisition team, whilst also maybe testing potential for which could be included on an Avengers type team, retrieving everything from an OP character like Sentry or Vibranium for power armor. THEN it IS a means to an ends of creating one of the three rumored Avengers teams we were getting, and from a wider MCU POV a way to also intro new antagonist group/team to fill the void of not having HYDRA, AIM or OSCORP currently.
StSteven
StSteven - 4/14/2024, 7:37 PM
@Apophis71 - Agreed. As I was saying I think that this is essentially the "origin story" of a team that will run alongside the regular Avengers team (whatever that ends up looking like) doing the type of jobs that the regular Avengers wouldn't do (which is a pretty interesting dynamic if you ask me). I mean, the last real incarnation of the Avengers was led by CA which by that team by default a sort of "Boy Scout" version of that team, not willing to do the government's dirty work. So here we have the opportunity to have a black op (or "dark" if you will) version of that team, which I think a lot of fans will like. Hell, they could even recruit Deadpool and make what would essentially be an R-rated Avengers movie for the grown-ups. If you think about it it all kinda makes sense. I'm sure that the success of "DP&W" will go some way to informing how much Marvel is willing to embrace its "dark" (i.e. R-rated) side, but the TB/DA could be a way for them to set up a franchise that gives Avengers fans what would essentially be a DP version of the Avengers.

Either way, I've VERY interested in seeing where this goes...
The1st
The1st - 4/15/2024, 11:10 AM
@DravenCorvis - I want the Madisynn is Mephisto payoff...

User Comment Image
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 6:39 AM
Well it's certainly not a Thunderbolts movie.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 7:32 AM
@ObserverIO - Every single member of the team has been part of an iteration of a Thunderbolts team in the comics (putting aside stuff like it isn't a comic accurate Tasmaster and the like). The question is more are they are a mostly villains in disguise type of version, a sort of hero team of the suicide squad ilk, full hero team or something else.

STILL think that Zemo will turn up, likely with a Masters of Evil team of some form but we'll see, just too many Super Soldiers in it to not draw him out considering he has been fully setup as being against those.

At minimum the * suggests that maybe it isn't the real official name of the team or it at least has an AKA name, however could suggest that by the end some have switched to being part of a full on villain team (likely Bucky and Yelena surviving but not joining) and the end credit will be the name of Zemo's team (if I am in the correct ballpark) NOT Thunderbolts as would be the norm, that replaces what had been the Thunderbolt one (so in effect the film has two names instead of one).
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 9:06 AM
@Apophis71 - The modern version of the Thunderbolts is basically just a Marvel Suicide Squad. The original concept is all gone.

It's like if Miles Morales was never bit by a Spider, put on a costume and started fighting supervillains, but instead became murderer who leaves stuffed Tarantulas at the scene of the crime. It just wouldn't have anything to do with Stan Lee's original concept.
And the Suicide Squad-esque Thunderbolts has nothing to do with Kurt Busiek's original concept. I think Dark Avengers would be a better title to segue into.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 9:23 AM
@ObserverIO - Cept it is even less like the comic Dark Avengers, any version of, than multiple versions of Thunderbolts are as all that is needed for this to turn into what folk expect the original Thunderbolts concept to be is for Zemo to turn up with a few other characters and it become Masters of Evil cos ultimately that was what the original Thunderbolts was, Masters of Evil in disguise, not a real new team at all but a pseudonym of another pre-existing team, a villainous one, that returned to that original team name.

We can nitpick about original intent and which comic iterations are true to that or not, point is all the characters have been antagonists at various points in MCU history that we know are in it, all adaptions of characters who had been at various points in time in the comics villains, and all have at one point or another been members of an iteration of Thunderbolts.

Thus starting out with, at government direction, a suicide squadesque take on Thunderbolts being formed, in the absence of an Avengers team, and at the end having Master of Evil revealed would be much the same as the original run in many ways even if the starting point differs slightly.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 10:21 AM
@Apophis71 - Black Widow and The Winter Soldier aren't my idea of MCU villains though, even if they were in the comics. Even Red Guardian was always just an anti-hero (even though he mentioned Captain America in passing, he was never villainous). John Walker was antagonistyic but ultimately a hero, an anti-hero at worst. Taskmaster was a villains puppet, freed from his mind control by the end. Ghost was a villain that was redeemed by the end, etc.

None of them are really villains. Some of them are based on villains from the comics. The twist of the Masters of Evil being behind the masks was supposed to be shocking. It's the simplicity of the new heroes secretly being villains. And then they kinda become anti-heroes throughout the course of the story. Or some of them do.

This is not that. Not even if they throw Baron Zemo in there, who in the MCU is already something of an anti-hero.

It should be established MCU villains, as the heroic guises of the original Thunderbolts with Zemo thrown in for good measure. In a world without the Avengers they step up as the new superheroic team, but they're actually villains with ulterior world domination motives, but then by the end of it they're actual heroes (or anti-heroes).

That's the Thunderbolts. Again this is not that.

Just because some of these characters have been Thunderbolts in recent iterations of the comics team (that is now Thunderbolts in name only and more akin to the Suicide Squad) doesn't make this anything less than an extremely poor translation of a brilliant, truly unique and some might even say classic '90s Marvel comic.

This is a team of anti-heroes with no false heroic disguises, put together by the government. It's the Suicide Squad.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 4/14/2024, 10:30 AM
@ObserverIO - bingo! You get it
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 10:38 AM
@ObserverIO - Cept WAY harder to pull of what the comics did directly in an adaption but at points all of them were film or show antagonists regardless of how you precisely label them other than maybe Red Guardian but even he was an enemy agent who was revealed to have had a history fighting on the other side to America (even fighting A Captain America supposedly even if that doesn't realy match up timeline wise).

We can twist it whatever way we want but there has been over a dozen versions of Thunderbolts in the comics and if the film reveals Masters of Evil and some of them join that then much the same basic idea even if obvious differences.

There is no way in a 2hr film you could do exactly what the first story arc in the comics of Thunderbolts did in a live action adaption anyway however but when has the MCU ever lifted things directly, they take aspects from multiple iterations and stories not direct adaptions.

Just because some may with good reason be fixated on ONLY the first version not all the others doesn't negate anything they could do and that all these characters have been members of Thunderbolt teams.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 10:43 AM
@ObserverIO - Also need to keep in mind if they DID do an exact copy of the original story a bunch of the members of Zemo's team would all want to be real hero's by the end and some would go straight back to villains so...

...anyway, it will be what it will be.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 10:56 AM
@Apophis71 - "There is no way in a 2hr film you could do exactly what the first story arc in the comics of Thunderbolts did in a live action adaption anyway however but when has the MCU ever lifted things directly, they take aspects from multiple iterations and stories not direct adaptions."

Of course you could make a 2hr film out of that story. Just like the MCU made films from the story of the origins of Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Doctor Strange, etc.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 11:48 AM
@ObserverIO - You would need to have fully established the Masters of Evil first before the film doing a direct adaption of the Thunderbolts story, they would then have to go on multiple missions to slowly gain the trust and respect, then you would need the presumed dead Avengers to return and the reason why Zemo did all of that (to gain access to SHIELD records) would need to be changed...

Having a handfull of hero origins who then come together as a team, fairly easy to do.

Fully creating a list of multiple well established villains across dozens of stories, then forming a team of villains, then pretending to actualy be a team of heroes and gaining the trust doing full hero stuff on several missions, then revealing they are the villan team, but some grew to like being heroes and/or thought they were supposed to be reforming to be heroes not just pretending for villanious reasons etc etc...

Not as easy, impossible in 2hrs and probably wouldn't attract the GA as would need WAY too much homework or to be a super nerd like us and they wouldn't have a clue who almost anyone was (least all the ones they picked have been in the prior films and/or shows) and less likely to be led to believe they were watching a hero team that turned out not to be a hero team. It is a push for the GA as it is using the known characters they have to be interested, all unknowns bar Zemo no chance.

...can't do all that in a 2hr film, would need to all basicaly be unknown characters OR do a loose adaption where they have been previously used antagonists are in the shades of grey area and could go full villain OR full hero. However your kinda overlooking the point that Thunderbolts was only EVER a name only thing as they were not Thunderbolts with that first team they were Master of Evil with a fake name.

What works in comics after decades laying the path, takes place over dozens of comics then has decades of the aftermath cannot always be directly translated.
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 12:27 PM
@Apophis71 - The best thing to do would be to set them up from Phase 1, but since they didn't they could still adapt the story of the Thunderbolts using different villains. MCU villains.

So Abomination, Justin Hammer, Ultron, Mordo, Vulture, Bullseye, Wanda, Xu Xialing, Namor, throw some Zemo in there as Citizen V. Have them all take on the identities of the original Thunderbolts team. Tell the same story but with the MCU equivalent of the Masters of Evil.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 12:54 PM
@ObserverIO - Which is sorta what they are doing by using characters who were villains at one point or another cos Hammer, Mordo and Xu Xialing were less villains than any of these we are getting have been, Bullseye hasn't even been in the MCU properly yet, Wanda to be dead, Namor isn't going to be working for any humans yet and Ultron too OP to be under Zemo...

...however the whole fakeout of making them look like Avengers then reveal doesn't work for adaption anywhere near as well as it did in the comics cos spoilers ruin it so all or nothing for OW and STILL need to make HUGE shortcuts and changes so wouldn't come close to being the same story anyway.

At least with the way they are going, picking all the ones in the shades of grey area, it is less predictable who could go full villain by the end, who could go hero as no time to do what they did in the comics to sell full villains ending up staying as a hero team...

...but then after that there was multiple other times in differing ways when the team was again full villains including the first time Yelena was supposed to be on it but then revealed to be Nat disguised as Yelena to infiltrate them they can pull from if wanting it be villains in disguise storyline. As I say twelve versions of a small team plus the Thunderbolts army iteration they can pull aspects from. Till we know precisely how it will all play out wrong for any of us to assume they are going with a full hero one or a suicided squad type iteration as we don't even know with certainty if the person in charge is a good guy or villain yet.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 4/14/2024, 1:17 PM
@Apophis71 - I think it's weak because none of them are villains and thus the drama of their characters are lacking to me. Along with cheap like 3 super soldiers in it to me.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 1:55 PM
@dagenspear - I do get that but Ghost and Taskmaster haven't REALY had a redemption arc at all yet to speak of, the latter of which is a total unknown with her having been mind controlled when she was a full villain and the former only opted to play nice due to needing the stuff from the QR so wouldn't take much to go full villain again (and A Goliath has STRONG ties to Zemo, even if not the same one).

Why I am hoping some additional full villains do appear alongside Zemo as the main antagonists and can easily have Ghost and Taskmaster join his side, Red Guardian likely snuffs it and Bucky isn't even supposed to be in the team at first according to recent rumors. At least they didn't go with the heroic age version led by Luke Cage anyway which would be daft as the first MCU iteration :D
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 4/14/2024, 2:03 PM
@Apophis71 - If they could pull off the same twist as Thunderbolts #1 without spoilers it would be an awesome feat.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/14/2024, 2:07 PM
@ObserverIO - For sure, fingers crossed it is at least a decent movie, pref a great one oviously however they play it and hope they manage to cont to keep most of it under wraps (or at least enough mud in the water we aren't sure what is true or not).
dagenspear
dagenspear - 4/14/2024, 7:30 PM
@Apophis71 - Ghost may not have changed from being a villain, but she did stop being a villain in the story she was introduced in and Taskmaster never was a villain as used in the movie she was in.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/15/2024, 6:16 AM
@dagenspear - Your just nitpicking, both were used as antagonists up until the very end of the films, precise definitions are kinda meaningless and did state Taskmaster is a blank slate as she was brainwashed so could be anything without that on the spectrum from devil to saint but more likely to end up never a true hero to my mind, antihero maybe and easily could turn out is full villain. Also needs to be pointed out that in MCU timeline both haven't actualy been seen with Ghost and Taskmaster for about a decade (both were antagonists pre or around the same time as IW, 5yr gap, then time elapsed since Endgame).

Taskmasters is NOT like Hawkeye who started out hero, did villain stuff under Loki's control, then hero again as all we got was Taskmaster fighting the protagonists throughout Black Widow and basicaly nothing after released from that control.

This is the whole point however, trickier to do the first comic iteration where they were all full, well established villains pretending to be hero's as if they had been set up as 100% evil villains we would know from the get go by cast list even if in disguise. There would be no surprise reveal and I'd argue almost impossible to convincingly do the some choosing to stay heroes at the end and sell it to the GA after only one or two missions not dozens of comics worth of them.

Thus going with ones that are less defined, grey areas and relative blank slates that have been antagonists who could go either way works better and also includes characters we could easily see being killed thus raising the stakes. The other way they could have gone is make it blatantly the Thunderbolts army version that were all in jail that was undeniably a suicide squad affair.

This way they can go from something similar in general theme to Thunderbolts I where it turns out Valentina has villainous intent creating a group of supposed hero's even if obvious differences. That could lead to some forming their own actual hero team at the end whilst others join a full villain one which COULD lead into a loose adaption of the second comic Thunderbolts team arc where they are hero's then assisted when needed by having captured villains the option to help or go to jail thing as part of the Thunderbolt army.

However it isn't entirely clear and the uncertainty means we are guessing which way it all will go and if they could be more heros or more toward the villain side with each member, don't know if they are being made to do good things or bad ones, lot of shades of grey making it less easy to know how it will all pan out which in some ways makes it more interesting.
dagenspear
dagenspear - 4/15/2024, 6:42 AM
@Apophis71 - Precise definitions may be what equals what the characters are and their placements in the story may be to some. The ideas of what they could do are "ifs", and may be seen that what we have are what they've done with them. Either way, TM doesn't have any real personal character stake as a drive. And Ghost had a single focus in her villainy in her appearance and that wasn't altered at the end in theory.
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 4/15/2024, 8:36 AM
@dagenspear - If's, who were antagonists regardless specifics of how or why, work well however for a character presented as part of a hero team that turns out to actualy be a villain fitting the mold of the original concept, why I say your nitpicking, lol.

We don't know what paths those two went down in the decade on the timeline since they last featured thus can readily be sold as possibly Bucky like (red in the ledger but reformed) but easily could also be believable they have actualy descended into full villains in the interim offscreen if that is where they go with them.

When they are fully known as undeniable evil villains near impossible in live action adaption to ever convince they are heroes as the cast list alone would give it away. In a comic just keep them in costume and no clue present to tip off the reader unless the writer chooses to reveal their real identity. The if's and grey zones work better if keeping anywhere close to the original iteration of used for villanious purposes to do what is percieved to be heroic then revealed to be villain (with some opting to stay/become heroes).

As I stated elsewhere the other option would be to have almost all unknown characters, but harder to sell that to the GA (and for the execs to be open to risk spending money doing so) than a collection of known supporting characters and/or antagonists in the grey zone. Likely why Bucky, due to HOW well known and could believe these other characters history is similar (have been on the wrong side but reformed or never were bad but corrupted into doing bad things) has been included in the cast list of team members even if isn't actualy on the team at the start at all and only has a supporting role in the film. It helps sell it otherwise would be too much on Yelena and the Marvel brand to sell it and maybe to a lesser extent Red Guardian whilst also aiding a perception these are all good guys all be it with murky pasts (even if they are NOT good guys).
jonathanstrange
jonathanstrange - 4/14/2024, 6:39 AM
I think they will be introduced by the government as the new avengers, with David Harbour in a "Iron Man" suit, a Black Widow, a Wasp, a "Captain America..." I think they will turn to be Thunderbolts after something goes wrong. That's why the Winter Soldier is not in the movie... he's not an avenger.
CerealKiller1
CerealKiller1 - 4/14/2024, 7:55 AM
@jonathanstrange - But Bucky IS in the movie. He’s been in it from the beginning..?
1 2 3 4

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder