PEACEMAKER Creator James Gunn Explains Why He's No Fan Of The "Perfect Female Badass" Trope

PEACEMAKER Creator James Gunn Explains Why He's No Fan Of The "Perfect Female Badass" Trope

Peacemaker creator and DC Studios co-CEO James Gunn has explained why he's never been a fan of the "perfect female badass" trope we see so often in movies and TV shows...

By MarkCassidy - Aug 29, 2025 07:08 AM EST
Filed Under: Peacemaker

DC Studios co-head and Peacemaker creator James Gunn is known for writing strong female characters, but the filmmaker has now explained why he's never been a fan of the "perfect female badass" trope we see so often in comic book/action movies and shows.

While Peacemaker's Emilia Harcourt is obviously a formidable fighter and a powerful female presence, the show - season 2, especially - makes it very clear that the former A.R.G.U.S. agent is a flawed person who is dealing (so far, unsuccessfully) with some major issues.

"As a female, you don't always get to play very three-dimensional, complicated characters," Jennifer Holland said on the latest episode of Peacemaker: The Official Podcast. "Either women are really mean and terrible or they're really nice, sweet and lovely. You [Gunn] add a lot of dimension to your characters."

"They're all people," Gunn responded. "There are differences between the sexes, obviously, but we're way more alike than different. When I came into [Hollywood], the female characters were always just perfect for the most part. As time went on, the quote-unquote 'female badass' started to occur. I also didn't necessarily like that because they weren't badasses like Star-Lord's a badass or Deadpool's a badass. They didn't have personalities. They were still perfect badasses. So, being able to allow flaws in those characters was, to me, the coolest thing you could do."

What do you make of Gunn's comments? Do you think characters like Emilia Harcourt have enough depth to avoid the usual "female badass" stereotypes?

Season 2, episode 2 of Peacemaker is now streaming.

Critics were only provided with the first five episodes for review purposes, and Gunn recently explained why.

"I am the one who's keeping the three episodes away from everybody because there are too many surprises in those last three episodes," he revealed. "Especially 6 and 8, they are just crazy, my favourite things I've ever done of anything." 

Will David Corenswet's Superman make a cameo? That's the prevailing theory, but there's a chance Gunn will take the opportunity to reintroduce some characters from The Suicide Squad.

"The new season follows Christopher 'Chris' Smith, aka Peacemaker, the vigilante Super Hero as he struggles to reconcile his past with his newfound sense of purpose while continuing to kick righteous evil-doer butt in his misguided quest for peace at any cost.

In season 2, Peacemaker discovers an alternate world where life is everything he wishes it could be. But this discovery also forces him to face his traumatic past and take the future into his own hands.”

PEACEMAKER Episode 3 Title May Hint At A Major DCEU Return - Possible SPOILERS
Related:

PEACEMAKER Episode 3 Title May Hint At A Major DCEU Return - Possible SPOILERS

Chris Hemsworth Opens Up On Whether AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY Sets The Stage For Rumored THOR 5 Movie
Recommended For You:

Chris Hemsworth Opens Up On Whether AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY Sets The Stage For Rumored THOR 5 Movie

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. ComicBookMovie.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2 3
ClungeOfSteel
ClungeOfSteel - 8/29/2025, 7:22 AM
So many dimensions 👀😅

User Comment Image
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2025, 10:51 AM
@ClungeOfSteel - I’m not complaining about a little old fashioned cheesecake in these films, but Gunn is on the right track with that. All great characters have flaws and fail before they learn a lesson and finally succeed. That’s character writing 101. No Mary Sue’s. Give us flawed believable female badasses without shoving some feminist anti male agenda down our throats (turning the guys into bafoons). You can’t tell us we should like a character it has to be earned
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 8/29/2025, 7:26 AM
he's so full of shit and his show is terrible.
SteviesRightFoo
SteviesRightFoo - 8/29/2025, 7:31 AM
@JacobsLadder - remember he said the flash was one of the greatest superhero movies ever? This guy is a professional liar and almost a complete charlatan
Scarilian
Scarilian - 8/29/2025, 7:31 AM
@JacobsLadder -
He just wanted to make a show with a tiny cock during an orgy so he can flaunt his hobby of [frick]ing young boys.

His cinematic universe dreams are likely dead and he knows he won't be given a chance to make much more. Superman ($606.7m) grossed less than Man Of Steel ($670m) and with Superman having a minimum of a $225m budget that's not enough profit to justify future installments. Supergirl will likely flop and DC already seem to be prepping to move back towards the Reevesverse.
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 8/29/2025, 7:36 AM
@Scarilian - the dude is sick and people keep making excuses for his shit.
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 8/29/2025, 7:37 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - agree
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2025, 7:45 AM
@Scarilian -

Target 500m
Over 600m
Post covid
Quazi-sequel moving to production
Snyder moving on

Yeah. DCU is here to stay. Like it or not.
DS616
DS616 - 8/29/2025, 8:13 AM
@JacobsLadder - You're so full of cope and your taste is terrible.

Enjoy another "epic" year in the basement.
DS616
DS616 - 8/29/2025, 8:14 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - And you're a professional terminally-online, triggered man-child.

Mummy upstairs in the kitchen must be so proud XD XD XD XD XD XD
DS616
DS616 - 8/29/2025, 8:15 AM
@Scarilian - LOL Keep coping and failing you scary-dumb man-baby
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/29/2025, 8:49 AM
@JacobsLadder - cope [frick] heads
regularmovieguy
regularmovieguy - 8/29/2025, 8:55 AM
A thread of Snyderbots coping. Grab the popcorn.

User Comment Image
ObserverIO
ObserverIO - 8/29/2025, 9:48 AM
@UltimaRex - I'm all in on Gunn's DCU, but shouldn't the target have been to break even?
JacobsLadder
JacobsLadder - 8/29/2025, 10:00 AM
@bobevanz - lol. well said
DianaGohan
DianaGohan - 8/29/2025, 10:51 AM
@Scarilian - Uh how can you move BACK towards the Reevesverse when all the principal lead actors and even directors of those movies are dead or retired dumbass? And before you go "oh they can just recast those actors and directors and make more movies in that universe" they already tried that and it was called Superman Returns, an ACTUAL Box office bomb that didn't even do well critically that made them totally reboot Superman in the total OPPOSITE direction with Man of Steel.

Look you can like or dislike the new Superman movie all you want but due to high critical praise and the fact it DID make a profit means it's a hit that WB is going to continue running with. And quite honestly the reason that the box office for this film is lower then Man of Steel has to do with foreign markets specifically China not really pumping up Superhero films for the most part like they used to thus getting much softer figures. So yeah like it or not this DCU is still continuing so continue being a whiny bitch about that just know it won't change anything.
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2025, 10:54 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - That will stay with him. They also threw away an opportunity to unite Cavil’s Superman with Keaton’s Batman and wasted it on a character no one will remember. Then they made Barry a weirdo and basically wiped Keaton’s Bats from existence
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 8/29/2025, 10:57 AM
@SteviesRightFoo - I don't think he was lying about how he felt about The Flash. He was obviously wrong, but he was upfront about his feelings.
Scarilian
Scarilian - 8/29/2025, 11:00 AM
@UltimaRex -
$225m 'official' budget. Even if we believe the budget is accurate, which it probably is not as studios under-report, that'd be a break-even of $550m and a profit of around $50m... which is not good. Studios generally want enough profit to turn around another movie to warrant full steam ahead.

Supergirl is likely a similar budget of around $200m and it doesn't have the level of interest that Superman had.

Meanwhile Peacemaker Season 2 is performing worse than the first season did, opening to lower viewership than the first season.

Snyderverse is dead
Gunnverse will die
Reevesverse will take over next with Clayface as a transition movie going into Batman Part 2.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2025, 5:15 PM
@ObserverIO - apparently $500m WAS break even. Unsure how exactly that works because no ones going to pay me to find out...
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2025, 5:18 PM
@Scarilian - as I said, $500m WAS break even. You want me to break it down, someone is going to have to pay me. I'm not doing that kind of maths for free.
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 8/29/2025, 7:37 AM
Maybe if the woman looked the part we would be able to suspend our disbelief.

Regardless of how you feel about Gina Carano, she looked the part and we know she can kick ass. I'm sorry, but Viola Davis is a 5'5" 60 yr old out of shape woman, and they've tried to sell her as an action star on more than one occasion. It's just goofy.
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2025, 7:50 AM
@DarthOmega - as much as I don't buy Viola Davis as an action star (and half the time that's the point so...), all Waller does is glower, growl and flip switches. That's right up Davis' alley...
DarthOmega
DarthOmega - 8/29/2025, 7:57 AM
@UltimaRex - I'm talking about the Woman King and G20
UltimaRex
UltimaRex - 8/29/2025, 8:13 AM
@DarthOmega - Woman King I don't know but I did sit through G20. Her character was set up to be out of practice killing fools as part of being the president. How well that worked? It almost did for me but... well... "almost" only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades...
Bucky74
Bucky74 - 8/29/2025, 10:56 AM
@DarthOmega - Agreed. Even fiction has to have some semblance of believability
n1ghtw1ng2832
n1ghtw1ng2832 - 8/29/2025, 7:52 AM
Of course now all of a sudden she's this badass who knows how to fight when in The Suicide Squad she was just some chick behind a computer and all of a sudden she's doing all this. It's so stupid and that's one of the main reasons I'm not watching season 2, as much as I loved season 1.
UncleHarm1
UncleHarm1 - 8/29/2025, 11:08 AM
@n1ghtw1ng2832 - Oh my gosh,she has 2 skills, computer and punching? What a Mary Sue
Laridian
Laridian - 8/29/2025, 1:19 PM
@n1ghtw1ng2832 - Good for you. Nobody cares.
elgaz
elgaz - 8/29/2025, 7:55 AM
I don't really get what he means.

"I also didn't necessarily like that because they weren't badasses like Star-Lord's a badass or Deadpool's a badass. They didn't have personalities"

So what, they have to be sarcastic douchebags? It's not like there's been a shortage of female badass characters who are hugely memorable without having to resort to Gunn's trademark humour.

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image

User Comment Image









DS616
DS616 - 8/29/2025, 8:20 AM
@elgaz - Literally every single one of those characters would be called "unlikeable woke feminists" if their movies released in the modern era (the last two are from the modern era and get that exact hate for zero logical reason whatsoever), so point proven.
bobevanz
bobevanz - 8/29/2025, 8:50 AM
@DS616 - that's because there are too many dumb asses today that cry woke about everything. Insecure man babies
Radders
Radders - 8/29/2025, 9:10 AM
@DS616 - Well neither Sarah Connor or Trinity were the main star of the movies- there was a reason Sarah Connor was like she was, and an explanation for Trinity's badassery (as do several others) and Ripley was an established character - but also most of these had character, depth, flaws etc.

If they were made today, they would be made the same way as all the other girl boss movies - so probably would rightly be called "woke" and even if they weren't people wouldn't go and see them because of all the failed and terrible girl boss movies to date - that's pattern recognition.

And what hate are you talking about? People wanted a BW movie but it was too late and bad and I don't remember anyone hating Daenerys until the writers did a sharp turn with her character

No point proven
Apophis71
Apophis71 - 8/29/2025, 9:11 AM
@DS616 - If they would or wouldn't have had backlash aside (I tend to agree with you) it is hard to say there wasn't a lack of them as for every female badass there were dozens of male ones and the vast majority of leading females surface level in terms of character more there for eye candy than anything else.

We always get the same list of great female characters of decades past and to me that kinda proves, not disqualifies, how rare we got great well written female characters in movies.

Also all characters in Alien were written as non-gender specific anyway, Ripley specificaly started out as a male character in all scripts for it, very late in development they switched to casting Sigourney Weaver rather than a man, but as I say those scripts had notes attached that they could interchange male for female or vice versa without issue when it came to casting which was why she was almost always referred to by surname not first name.

However the main point being made by Gunn was the characters were almost always 'perfect' be that perfect bad-ass who was better at the fork lift thing than any of the men on a spaceship, or perfectly 'nice', rare they delved much into character flaws in major mainstream female characters within the SciFi, CBM and action genres. Another they throw up is always Terminator, the first film Sarah Conner was perfectly nice sans much depth, second film she'd switched to perfectly bad-ass ditching almost everything that was 'nice' or feminine about her prior to the events of the first and what she did between movies thus a realy BAD mother, lol.

There are good examples of three dimensional female characters within those genres, but not many that did great number at the BO or viewing numbers for TV realy. I'd say one of the best to delve into character flaws a LOT AND Kickass was Katie Sackhoff's Starbuck in the 00's TV adaption of Battlestar Galactica who DID get a LOT of backlash due to being a change from the prior male version and a less idealistic version of the character at that but even then they kinda did so by making her a very male stereotype that happened to be female thus devoid much if any femininity at all.
WalletsClosed
WalletsClosed - 8/29/2025, 9:13 AM
@Radders - They were woke girlbosses then and they're definitely woke girlbosses now. There's no defending it. Ripley sucked and so did Sarah and i'm tired of pretending otherwise. Ripley in particular, was gender swapped from the script. Their movies are good in spite of them, not because of them. Arnold carried terminator
DS616
DS616 - 8/29/2025, 9:20 AM
@Radders - So much stupid in a single comment. Brava.

Keep coping over basic common sense and objectively inarguable historical facts.
Ikusa
Ikusa - 8/29/2025, 10:30 AM
@MaxPaint - Back then strong female characters like those were organic and not ideology and agenda driven.
lazlodaytona
lazlodaytona - 8/29/2025, 11:00 AM
@elgaz - I'd also add Jodie Comer's Villanelle from the series Killing Eve.
Laridian
Laridian - 8/29/2025, 1:22 PM
@elgaz - Uhhhhh... you really put Buffy on that list when her dialogue was written by Joss Whedon? lol
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

View Recorder