SupermanEchols Reviews THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

SupermanEchols Reviews THE DARK KNIGHT RISES

Christopher Nolan has finished his Bat-trilogy, but Is this final installment a worthy conclusion? Click for my take in this spoiler free review of The Dark Knight Rises..

Follow SupermanEchols:
By SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012
Immersive is the best way to describe the world Christopher Nolan has built with his Batman films. No, these are not the most comic-accurate portrayals geeks and nerds worldwide could have hoped for when Batman was re-booted back in 2005, yet the Gotham that Nolan has crafted seems all so real and able to pull the audience in like no other director in recent memory has been capable of. As a fitting end to his Bat-trilogy, The Dark Knight Rises once again captivates the viewer and truly immerses you in the tragedy and triumph that Bruce Wayne endures as Gotham City’s savior.



The latest entry to the series picks up quite a bit of time after the events of The Dark Knight. Repercussions from Harvey Dent’s actions have directly impacted many of the main players. Gordon (Gary Oldman) holds the secret about the truth regarding Dent’s descent into evil, organized crime has all but diminished in the city and Bruce Wayne has retreated to his manor, effectively removing himself from active duty as the watchful protector of Gotham. A new threat however arises in the form of muscle-bound-mercenary Bane (Tom Hardy), and an intriguing cat-burglar (Anne Hathaway) is looking to pick the pockets of Gotham’s elite. After hearing about the devastation Bane is bringing to his city, Bruce is forced to decide if he should again take on the mantle of the Batman to face this foe head-on. Not wanting to see any more harm come to him, Alfred (Michael Caine) warns that going out again would ultimately be a death wish for Bruce. It is this decision that will put to test the limits of sacrifice Batman is willing to make in order to maintain Gotham’s peace.



Going into a lot more detail regarding the plot will ultimately be a disservice, as I believe there is still a lot to be discovered within the film, even for fans who’ve already seen every trailer or TV commercial leading up to its release. The story itself is actually quite simple to summarize, but it’s the characters within the story that make the plot so compelling. One of the standout performances that really hooked me was Joseph Gordon-Levitt as GCPD office John Blake. His idealistic beliefs may sound naïve, however he represents the good in the people of Gotham that Batman ultimately started his war on crime for. For me, both Levitt and Caine are the ones to watch in this installment. There is so much pain behind Alfred’s eyes, yet so much hope behind Blake’s.



Hardy’s Bane is vicious, just as I’d hoped. No, this is not a direct “straight-from-the-page” interpretation of the character, but like Nolan typically does, he’s fit a comic character in a somewhat real-world setting and made it work. Hardy’s size is quite impressive in some scenes, and his voice is unique, actually causing you to have more interest in his lines than if he’d just chosen a behemoth graveled-grunt for his vocal inflections. Hathaway is completely fitting in this role, despite what fans may have feared prior. No, this is not the Catwoman of the Burton-verse, however in the context of the film she is more utilitarian in dress and action than for show. She has a purpose, and her actions are meaningful and not simply storyline filler.



Looking back on the 3 films now, each is a different type of storytelling. Batman Begins was a character piece, driven by the themes of family and fear. The Dark Knight was a tale of chaos unleashed. It was in the vein of Michael Mann’s Heat, except a psychotic clown was thrown in amongst the mob tale. The Dark Knight Rises is a more visceral film. It is brutal in its action and consequences. This is a city under siege film and a bigger scale threat than the prior 2 movies put together. The best part of it all? It works as a fitting bookend to the story of Bruce Wayne’s journey as Batman. True, the individual stories stand on their own as great films, but in hindsight you can see this is a much larger picture encapsulating key points in Batman’s war on crime.



As complimentary as I’m being, no, this is in no way a film without flaws. There are quite a few moments where events that happen are too convenient or details of their occurrence are simply overlooked in order to move the story along at a brisk pace. It can be jarring if you’re looking to pick the film apart, but as a movie-going experience, I think most will find you are able to get past these as you lose yourself in the overall adventure. After all, films are an escapist-medium, one where you allow yourself to completely enter a world someone else has crafted for a few hours, and Nolan’s Gotham is one of the most well-developed cinema-verses in recent history.



Bottom line: This is EXACTLY how this series needed to end, with a bang, not a whimper. Nolan went all out with shooting much of the film in IMAX(how I saw it- breathtaking), giving Batman a truly brutal adversary to face, and bringing Bruce Wayne’s story full circle in a satisfying fashion.



Grade: A+
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
5
LIKE!
111 Comments
1 2 3
Jaywing - 7/19/2012, 9:54 AM
Awesome review... I feel like you grasp (IMO) what movies are about. Every movie has its flaws... Especially every comic book movie. But it's the overall experience and emotional connection that determines whether a movie is good to the individual.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 10:00 AM
This is one of those films where a critic that wanted to pick it apart could probably find something to complain about in every scene if they wanted. I read Harry's review on Aint It Cool News this morning and he bashed the film, but it's completely ridiculous in his reasongings. Ultimately, if you sit back and let yourself enjoy the world that these characters inhabit then you will be able to buy into everything that happens.
ksommer - 7/19/2012, 10:39 AM
@SupermanEchols while I agree with you to an extent, you shouldn't have to "buy into something" in order for a movie to be good. I'm not saying this movie won't be good... Just debating. :)
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 10:46 AM
@ksommer Perhaps "buy into" is a bad way of phrasing it. I mean you need to accept the fact that you're watching a film about a man dressed as a bat fighting crime who employs billions of dollars of technology. It's not that what happens is just ludicrous, but after all we're watching a comic book film, so you have to go into it with a bit of an open mind to fantasy to begin with. I get Nolan's "real-take" on Batman, but some people expect WAY too much realism, even if they are watching a fictional hero onscreen.
ksommer - 7/19/2012, 10:54 AM
@Supermanechols that's fair. :)

@blackandyellow HA! That's funny.
deanwilkins - 7/19/2012, 10:56 AM
There are many justifications in your review. As others have done as well.

When you use the words, "No, this is not a direct “straight-from-the-page” interpretation of the character" I'm officially turned off. I want the comic Batman, not Nolan's version.

I'll avoid further comments for now.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 10:57 AM
@blackandyellow that's understandable. ;0)
kingshnake - 7/19/2012, 10:58 AM
I know u joke blackandyellow the only review aggregator you need is kingshnake's mind ;)
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 10:59 AM
@DoubleD I don't think I've ever seen a "perfect" film. A+ to me is a film that I absolutely loved while watching it, would pick up the day it hit Blu-ray and most likely re-watch on multiple occasions. If I was going by my ability to find ANYTHING wrong with a movie, then I'd never give an A+. I also gave that grade to Avengers, which wasn't perfect, but on the same enjoyment level.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:01 AM
@deanwilkins I don't think Nolan's Batman is in any way a "straight-from-the-page" interpretation of the character to begin with, so if you didn't like it in Begins or TDK then I can see where you'd not be expected to enjoy this either.
kingshnake - 7/19/2012, 11:01 AM
@DooubleD I see your point but where I'm from in school an A+ is 90% or up. I'm not being funny, I'm just saying that for the purposes of this review system, A+ does not necessarily mean 100%
Jaywing - 7/19/2012, 11:02 AM
I don't think there has been a movie in a long time that had this big of a target on its back... After the dark knight I'm surprised this is getting so many positive reviews. I thought for sure every critic would go in ready to pick this thing apart (I'm sure some still did)
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:03 AM
DoubleD- Thinking back, Batman as a character is not prominently featured as much as Bruce and the other supporting cast is. This is much more an ensemble piece, with Bruce and Alfred's relationship taking a forefront, as well as his with Blake.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:04 AM
@kingsnake That's exactly my train of thought here...the school grade. No, it's not a 100, but it's in the top of it's class for sure.

DoubleD I think the general audience will latch on to this moreso than the diehard comic crowd who have massively high expectations for a TDK follow up.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:05 AM
@yossarian ???
marvel72 - 7/19/2012, 11:06 AM
i suppose you gave it a+ because you was worried about death threats. :D
RorMachine - 7/19/2012, 11:07 AM
Double D, that's not how it works. There's no such thing a s perfect film, but a lot of 5 star/A+ reviews out there..care to explain that?
Wolfy1 - 7/19/2012, 11:07 AM
There are many ways this film can end, but everything points to things coming full circle, as many reviewers have stated.

In light of that, I have a STRONG suspicion that this film will end with Bruce Wayne finding out that he's going to be a father, thus having a whole family again.

I could certainly be wrong, but it'll be interesting to see...
elchupanibre5 - 7/19/2012, 11:07 AM
You know, I am a patient man but this little feud between Marvel and DC is becoming quite tiresome, grow the [frick] up you little pussies! All of you who constantly continue to attack each others enjoyments act like little bitches on their first period while attending a damn Bieber concert and it's [frick]ing pathetic. Let it go!
SpideyQuad - 7/19/2012, 11:08 AM
Just read Harry's review over@ ain't it cool. LOL, I knew this movie was going to be a cluster blank. This is your guys “Star Wars prequels” and it couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of retards. Just like then you all be saying how much you love the movie until the crapiness of it sinks in.

I love it because you guys gave this guy the free pass. This is what happens when you worship the golden cow.

so quick with all the hate this past spring, karma surely is a bitch
SpideyQuad - 7/19/2012, 11:09 AM
Saturday will indeed be fun
Sasquatch123 - 7/19/2012, 11:09 AM
Saw the movie in mixed crowd of comic book fans and general public ,great reaction to a very Average movie compared to the DK and a good movie along the lines of Batman Begins I didn't hate it nor did I leave feeling amped at a great film I give it 3 stars out of 5 ... as a fan of Batman I felt that Nolan Wrapped up his story in a Bow , spoiler kinda felt like the first five minutes of birds of pray tv show ,if u have seen it you'll get it.
Wolfy1 - 7/19/2012, 11:11 AM
I don't think having Bruce/Batman die at the end would in any way bring things "full circle".

To me, the only way to bring things "full circle" is to give Bruce back what he lost - a family. This would be in sync with the comics if they make "Miranda Tate" - probably Talia Al Ghul - the mother.

I guess time will tell.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:12 AM
@marvel72 Yes...I have to worry about my family. ;0)

@Wolfy1 The film coming full circle is a big part of why this worked for me. Won't go into confirming or denying your theory, but it makes sense in seeing Wayne's journey mean something.

@DoubleD I think the running time may affect multiple viewings. Just seeing it twice would mean someone watched nearly 6 hours of the film, and that's quite a time(and money for IMAX) investment. Storywise I'd love to see it again, as the inital screening is sometimes hard to overcome the sheer excitement and build up to a film on this scale.
RorMachine - 7/19/2012, 11:12 AM
"Just read Harry's review over@ ain't it cool"

Stopped reading.
Emanuel14 - 7/19/2012, 11:13 AM
coderaven - 7/19/2012, 11:14 AM
so when did a film require a 100% grade to get an A+.

Wouldn't a 95 to 100 be an A+.

Lot of haters.

THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 7/19/2012, 11:15 AM
@DoubleD
A+ = 94-100
A = 90-93
A- = 86-89
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:16 AM
@DoubleD Bane's voice was hard to pick out in a couple different scenes when he's given some back to back dialogue. Most of the time it's very clear and easy to distinguish when he's just doing one sentence line readings. When he has a couple different spots w/extended monologues it's difficult to understand certain words due to the mask muffling the sound.
SpaceRobot - 7/19/2012, 11:17 AM
Movie was amazing ! Review is spot on. No movie is without flaws, TDKR's flaws don't take away form the grand scheme of things and the overall brilliance of the movie. A+ for me too.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:18 AM
@RorMachine I'd seen a link to his review on another site showing the negativty some reviews are bringing out. I thought he was pretty off-base w/most of his arguments.
GoILL - 7/19/2012, 11:19 AM
Nice review dude and as blackandyellow said don't pay attention to some of the folks who will post about your review.
marvel72 - 7/19/2012, 11:20 AM
@ SupermanEchols

just f*ckin with ya,i'm glad you enjoyed it,i think i'll go wednesday next week.
ekrolo2 - 7/19/2012, 11:21 AM
If people are expecting TDK 2 or something, then I suggest you don't even watch this, this film is a very different from its predecessor and I can see it being the subject of much debate for years to come.

I do agree with SupermanEchols when he said that this is not a straight from the page adaptation then thats a good thing for me, this series has never been the comic books and if you start wanting the 3rd one to completely break the realistic foundation of this whole series, then you're stepping into X3 or Spider-Man 3 territory.

Sure some stuff may piss off die hard Batman fans like Bane origin being changed, some of the things the characters do and yes Batman doesn't get too much screen time.

But still, I myself as a comic reader have never seen these as CBMs, TDK was a crime drama featuring Batman, Joker, Gordon,.... This is a war film featuring Batman, Bane, Catwoman,...

Batman Begins was probably the most comic booky out of the 3 films, but it was a character study/origin of Batman so it needed to be like that.

@Emanuel14 Jeremy Jahns word is law, if he says a movie is awesometacular then by god it is awesometacular xD

SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:21 AM
@GoILL Thank you sir...much appreciated.
AsianVersionOfET - 7/19/2012, 11:23 AM
Looks like an awesome review, and I know there probably aren't any spoilers in it, however, I'm not going to read any reviews until I've come out of the movie tomorrow!
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:24 AM
@ekrolo2 You hit the nail on the head and I 100% agree. This series was never meant to be a straight adaptation of the comic. Liberties were always taken to make this particular story feel more "grounded". Anyone thinking this will suddenly feature a character who grows almost double in size onscreen after injesting liquid steroids is highly likely to be disappointed.
sinsear912 - 7/19/2012, 11:27 AM
You people sound like religious zealots... it wasnt that good of a movie. Christopher nolan is not the next messiah. Dark knight was better, and really lets be honest you take the joker outta that and you got a boring movie.
Phlegmbot - 7/19/2012, 11:27 AM
"Hardy’s Bane is vicious, just as I’d hoped. No, this is not a direct “straight-from-the-page” interpretation of the character, but like Nolan typically does, he’s fit a comic character in a somewhat real-world setting and made it work. Hardy’s size is quite impressive in some scenes, and his voice is unique, actually causing you to have more interest in his lines than if he’d just chosen a behemoth graveled-grunt for his vocal inflections. Hathaway is completely fitting in this role, despite what fans may have feared prior. No, this is not the Catwoman of the Burton-verse, however in the context of the film she is more utilitarian in dress and action than for show. She has a purpose, and her actions are meaningful and not simply storyline filler."

This is nothing more than a defense of the director's choices, NOT a review/critique of the film.

If you feel moved to defend the director for his decisions, perhaps your POV is skewed.

Jeez, I just want to read a couple of honest reviews about the movie....
ekrolo2 - 7/19/2012, 11:29 AM
@SupermanEchols

Thanks man :) and heres hoping we can get a Arkham series style of movie so we can finally see characters like Freeze, Clayface, Poison Ivy, Croc,.... Done on the big screen.

And yeah if Bane actually did transform into the Hulk or something, then yeah I would have hated him.
Jaywing - 7/19/2012, 11:32 AM
@doubled There are TONS of reviews with excitement. Some saying its better than the dark knight... Lots saying it puts the avengers to shame... I just think this film has the challenge of being a sequel to the dark knight. People either compare it to that... Or nit pick because of it.
ekrolo2 - 7/19/2012, 11:36 AM
@Jaywing

Yeah people are already taking sides, but atleat the majority says this is a great movie, weather or not its better than Dark Knight or Avengers can be debated until the end of time.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:37 AM
@Pendaghast I would absolutely LOVE if the next Batman series moved totally away from the realism aspect and took on an Arkham Asylum look and feel. I don't know however if mainstream "critics"(since I do NOT consider myself one at all) would take to it as it wouldn't have the gravitas that Nolan took w/the story.

@DoubleD I don't think this film necessarily lends itself to a feeling of "excitement", but it is a solid completion of a story started 7 years ago.
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:39 AM
For the record, I do not think this film was better than TDK. I still feel like that was the strongest entry into the entire series. Heath Ledger's performance aside(as great as it was), I felt the pacing of that movie was pitch-perfect.
Jaywing - 7/19/2012, 11:40 AM
@ekrolo2

Yeah totally... that's all I could ask. I've been waiting for this movie for a loooooong time. I literally can not focus at work right now cause I'm going tonight.

Jaywing - 7/19/2012, 11:41 AM
@SupermanEchols

I think the fact that you gave this movie an A+ and STILL though TDK was better speaks volumes about Nolan's filmmaking and consistency
SHHH - 7/19/2012, 11:42 AM
Good Review...
Nubase - 7/19/2012, 11:43 AM
@DoubleD

you mean 5 to 12 years kids bouncing off the walls with exictement
SupermanEchols - 7/19/2012, 11:44 AM
@Jaywing If we were going by grades I would say BB was a 93, TDK a 98 and TKDR a 95. There's that school grade thing again! ;0)
brewtownpsych - 7/19/2012, 11:44 AM
Double D ... this is also third in the series ... talk to me when there is an Avengers III

*crickets*

Btw, can anybody even name a CBM that was the third in a series that did not completely suck, let alone be so universally acclaimed? I didn't think so.
1 2 3

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.