High-Frame-Rate Version Of THE HOBBIT To Be Released In Limited Number Of Locations

When the 48 frames-per-second version of The Hobbit footage was screened at CinemaCon earlier this year, it was met with a mixed reaction from those in attendance. Regardless, it now appears as if only a few select fans will be able to see it for themselves.

Follow Josh:
By Josh Wilding - 8/7/2012

Showblitz reports that despite Warner Bros.' confidence in high-frame-rate movies, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey will only have a limited release in the format. Despite a mixed reaction at CinemaCon earlier this year, the film now looks much better according to their sources, but the studio are still wary of giving it a wide release. Unfortunately for fans, this means that it may not even make it into all the major cities. Part of the reason for this is that some theatres simply aren't equipped for the HFR projection (although that may be sorted for some with a software upgrade next month). If The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey gets a good reception from moviegoers, it's likely that the studio would increase the release of the second and third instalments in the HFR format.






The adventure follows the journey of title character Bilbo Baggins, who is swept into an epic quest to reclaim the lost Dwarf Kingdom of Erebor from the fearsome dragon Smaug. Approached out of the blue by the wizard Gandalf the Grey, Bilbo finds himself joining a company of thirteen dwarves led by the legendary warrior, Thorin Oakenshield. Their journey will take them into the Wild; through treacherous lands swarming with Goblins and Orcs, deadly Wargs and Giant Spiders, Shapeshifters and Sorcerers.

Although their goal lies to the East and the wastelands of the Lonely Mountain first they must escape the goblin tunnels, where Bilbo meets the creature that will change his life forever…Gollum.

Here, alone with Gollum, on the shores of an underground lake, the unassuming Bilbo Baggins not only discovers depths of guile and courage that surprise even him, he also gains possession of Gollum’s "precious" ring that holds unexpected and useful qualities … A simple, gold ring that is tied to the fate of all Middle-earth in ways Bilbo cannot begin to know.


STARRING:

Martin Freeman as Bilbo Baggins
Ian McKellen as Gandalf the Grey
Richard Armitage as Thorin Oakenshield
Andy Serkis as Gollum
Hugo Weaving as Elrond
Benedict Cumberbatch as Smaug
Luke Evans as Bard the Bowman
Christopher Lee as Saruman the White
Cate Blanchett as Galadriel
Elijah Wood as Frodo Baggins
Orlando Bloom as Legolas

RELEASE DATE: December 14th, 2012.


Source: Showblitz
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
2
LIKE!
42 Comments
UnrealLuigi - 8/7/2012, 6:40 PM
This is probably a good idea to test the market response first, then if it's positive they should implement it in more theaters. I hope it'll be playing somewhere near me though
OnLeatherWings - 8/7/2012, 6:42 PM
GOOD!!!! because i dont wana see it that way
LoudNoises - 8/7/2012, 6:48 PM
Cool banner. I'm very curious to see what this 48fps looks like. I gather it's a bit like watching a blu-ray on an HD screen for the first time. It was a bit jarring the first time I watched a movie like that. There was so much definition it looked weird. But it didn't take long to adjust.
95 - 8/7/2012, 6:53 PM
I'd like to see it in 48fps (dearly hope they don't start charging extra for higher frame-rate films like they do with 3D).
fettastic - 8/7/2012, 7:10 PM
I read an article somewhere that explained how PJ screwed the pooch, not with the framerate, but with the shutter speed.

Apparently he split the difference to make it work for both 2D, 3D, 24 and 48 fps....and that makes it look not very good in any one of those formats. It makes it look stacato and weird. It has a very uneasy effect on the viewer.
PopcornMode - 8/7/2012, 7:19 PM
Since the movie experience is different with a higher frame rate, they will likely charge extra. I wonder how it'll look like. Hmm...
sKeemAn - 8/7/2012, 7:25 PM
Who Fcuking Cares?
JoeMomma29 - 8/7/2012, 7:40 PM
LOL I am more concerned with it being broken apart in three movies! Actually it is the time I have to wait to see all three movies is bugging me to death!
nld3 - 8/7/2012, 7:47 PM
I want to see this in the Higher Frame Rate!
THEDARKKNIGHT1939 - 8/7/2012, 8:13 PM
I just want to see the damn movie.
CampBlood - 8/7/2012, 8:18 PM
I'm just pissed I have to wait for the third movie to see the arkenstone
WatchfulGaurdain - 8/7/2012, 8:19 PM
GOD DAMN YOU, PETER JACKSON! GET YOUR 3D AND 48 FPS AWAY FROM MY LORD OF THE RINGS!
Alvahnomicron - 8/7/2012, 8:29 PM
Don't care about the frame-rate. DO care about how that modest book has turned into 3 movies.
FoxForce5 - 8/7/2012, 8:56 PM
As far as I understand, the 48 fps. Is supposed to make the 3D much smoother so I definitely hope to see it with the higher frame rate. Either way though, I can't freaking wait for this film!
Alvahnomicron - 8/7/2012, 9:12 PM
@Intruder
I get your point; it's a valid one. I meant modest only in number of pages. I'm just wondering how much embellishing will have to be done to pull out three movies, is all.
Respectfully, I don't find it more interesting than LOTR, but, that's just me.
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 9:38 PM
When i watch something in high frame rate it gives a films a strangly artificial look and takes away from the intended lighting and cinematography. Its interesting way to view a movie like Tron. I prefer the slower frame rate.
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 9:41 PM
@intruder- concider...with the splitting of material into three films, do you think their will be extended and regular cuts of the film when they come to Bluray? If so, will the extended cuts be as lengthy as we've come to expect?
UrbanKnight - 8/7/2012, 9:50 PM
I dont really like video shot in a faster frame rate. Looks weird. TOO smooth or stable, robotic. Dont know what it is, just weird. Tried getting use to it but cant.
It might be cool for 3d but then you get a smaller dimmer image.

Maybe an even faster frame rate might make it more natural looking but for now seems like its either too fast or not fast enough. Somewhere in between.

Either way i do want to see this.
Ceejay - 8/7/2012, 10:05 PM
No need, there's plenty of third age stuff to fill 3 movies with the Dwarf based history around Erebor, Moria and the fall of the kings of Gondor and Rohan let alone the rise of Sauron under the disguise as the Necromancer.
Ceejay - 8/7/2012, 10:19 PM
Make that two of us, it's not unfilmable but it take a great many films to tell the entire story of the Silmarillion. Just like the Hobbit, it may just be one book of lesser pagers but it contains more story than the entire three books of LOTR.
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 10:43 PM
Intruder and Ceejay-I guess it's a forgone conclusion that you two will never sleep with a woman.......lol....just kidding
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 10:53 PM
@Intruder- only if you roll a 3 on your 6 sided dice
Ceejay - 8/7/2012, 11:05 PM
@gaikinger - I'm 45 this year and just survived a year long battle with cancer. I intend to sleep with more women now than I have already in the short time you've been around this blessed Earth, Believe me! ;-)
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 11:06 PM
...and the paladin strikes with his mystical sword of light
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 11:18 PM
...oops, you fell into a pit and were eaten by a marsh monster....oooh tough break
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 11:27 PM
how can you strike when your trapped in an enchantment spell by a fourth level mage? huh? huh?
gaikinger - 8/7/2012, 11:29 PM
@Ceejay- glad you cleared the Cancer...very glad. I'm 44 FYI. I was just kidding about the getting laid joke by the by.
Ceejay - 8/7/2012, 11:39 PM
@gaikinger - Thanks ;-)
timmyjingoro - 8/8/2012, 12:13 AM
@Intruder, You will care about frame rates once you see how much 48fps can ruin something.
timotey - 8/8/2012, 12:14 AM
I think it's mostly because only a few cinemas are actually equipped to show 48fps, there's no need to look for some hidden reasons.
fungusmonkey - 8/8/2012, 12:24 AM
As someone who understands the tech, frame rates, and look... not interested at all. Gimme beautiful 2D 24fps any day. The reason we've used that specific frame rate for film for decades is because that's what "looks" like film. No matter what shutter angle tricks you do... 48fps doesn't look right. It'll end up looking like PAL. The only thing 48fps helps with is making 3D a little less blurry (which is why the industry is pushing it - 3D equals moola.
IIIAdamantiumIII - 8/8/2012, 1:39 AM
BRO I WANT 60 fps + OR GET THE [frick] OUT
timmyjingoro - 8/8/2012, 4:08 AM
LOL @Intruder vs.SirWinsalot

Tony Stark and Bruce Wayne engaged in a heated flame war!
ckal - 8/8/2012, 4:18 AM
Intruder-

No need to visit the first age at all since it has virtually no ties to TA outside of Sauron. The white council going to dol goldur is enough in itself.

As a huge tolkien nerd, I would love to see FA on screen though.


Sirwinsalot-

You are embarrassing.
Roscoe182 - 8/8/2012, 4:34 AM
wonder what the point in putting a youtube vid with this article ..... youtube vids are capped at 30 FPS.. so the vid with this article makes no sense.
ralfinader - 8/8/2012, 4:43 AM
Intruder - 8/7/2012, 6:38 PM
Report Comment
I don't give a damn about frame rates.

Just bring it PJ!

Agree 100%
Nomis1800 - 8/8/2012, 5:18 AM
Dammit! I want to see it in 48 FPS!!!
CrimsonReign - 8/8/2012, 6:21 AM
As long as it does not look like a Soap Opera...
fettastic - 8/8/2012, 6:48 AM
I have to agree that once you are used to a higher frame rate, or in my case, refresh rate, it seems completely normal. Pans look a hell of a lot better, that's for sure. It doesn't make anything look cheap or "too real" at all. Yes I understand that is your first impression, but it goes away.
Squish - 8/8/2012, 8:43 AM
@sirwinsalot - You must be pretty pathetic that you have to come to a totally different article to gloat about how you owned intruder. Are mommy and daddy not giving you enough positive reinforcement? You may have owned intruder yesterday but today you sound like a six year old girl begging for attention in the comments section of a comicbook website. You are really doing great things with your life!
GrayMatter - 8/8/2012, 10:35 AM
As a giant Tolkien nerd, I would kill to see all of that stuff Intruder mentioned from the Silmarillion and the First Age on the big screen. Not in the Hobbit movies, mind you, but in their own movies.

Too bad it'll probably never happen. Tolkien's family are pretty adamant about never selling the rights to the Silmarillion or anything else. They can`t do anything about The Hobbit or LOTR, since Tolkien himself sold those movie rights while he was alive, but everything else was published by his son Christopher Tolkien, and he aint sellin.

Which is also why everyone is concerned about the 3rd Hobbit movie. They have the rights to the Appendices in Return of the King, but not to the material in the Silmarillion or Unfinished Tales. So there`s a lot that they`re not gonna be able to use.
gaikinger - 8/8/2012, 3:29 PM
I was placed into the Hall of Shame by somebody called @Stilkenator89 for my postings on the Obama thread. If you look at the comments of concern, the reaction is beyond rediculous. I'm thinking it was @fettastic, but could be @Intruder or even @Godzillafart with an alias. pretty sad, pretty sad.

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.