Creepy HUNGER GAMES Concept Art Of Dead Tributes As Muttations

This is a must see for any fan of The Hunger Games. Concept artist Ian Joyner posted some fantastic concept art of bizarre creatures that were not used in the blockbuster hit.

Follow nailbiter111:
By nailbiter111 - 4/11/2012
I haven't read any of the books, so I was not familiar with the term, "Muttation." Which in the books is a genetically altered creature created by the Capital. These creatures come in many forms, and were created to do different tasks like spying on other districts, or being a weapon during the games. One such version of the Muttations is a wolf like creature that we did see in the movie, but was missing a significantly creepy element that was in the book:

Each of the mutts resembled one of the tributes who had died previously in the Games, had a collar marked with the district number of the tribute it was based off of, and had eyes that looked remarkably human. It became apparent that the dead tributes' DNA was mixed with a form of wolf. This made them look so much like their Tribute that Katniss wondered if they had been made using the tributes' real eyes. - thehungergames.wikia.com


What you see below is concept art for the Muttations with the faces of the tributes that died in the film. After glancing over them I'm glad this wasn't added to the film as one of my bigger complaints with the film was the dodgy CGI and I can't imagine this translating well on the screen.

Director Gary Ross even explained to ScreenRant why he didn't stay true to the book in this instance.

“We made the decision that they not be specific tributes, because if we did it, we would have been a massive digression at a moment in the movie where I didn’t think it could have afforded that. You’re hurdling toward the end and that would have taken a tremendous amount of room at a time when we didn’t have it. However, I will say that all the mutts, if you really look at them, they’re really half-human and half-dog. If you put a mutt’s face next to a dog’s face, and next to a human face, you really will see that they’re a hybrid of the two. And so we were specific about that.

The important thing about the mutts to me was, not specifically that they were tributes, but that they were a creation of the Capitol designed for this particular instrument at this particular moment in the games. And because we had the games and were actually able to show their creation, we were actually able to show them being birthed in that game center and then revealed in the games.

We had the ability to do something by cutting away that a novel isn’t when it’s constantly maintaining Katniss’s point of view."


































The Hunger Games hits theaters on March 23rd, 2012. The film stars: Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson, Liam Hemsworth, Woody Harrelson, Elizabeth Banks, Lenny Kravitz, Wes Bentley, Toby Jones, Alexander Ludwig, Isabelle Fuhrman, Amandla Stenberg, Stanley Tucci, and Donald Sutherland

Source: filmsketchr
DISCLAIMER: This article was submitted by a volunteer contributor who has agreed to our code of conduct. ComicBookMovie.com is protected from liability under "safe harbor" provisions and will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. For expeditious removal, contact us HERE.
2
LIKE!
26 Comments
Benjamitesandwich - 4/11/2012, 7:32 PM
Worst part of the book.
Tainted87 - 4/11/2012, 7:52 PM
Well I think it's good that they were at least planning on putting it into the movie. It wouldn't have worked, however. The mutated dogs were confusing for people enough, but those bearing the faces of the tributes... it'd blow their mind. Also, although it is later suggested in Catching Fire that the muttations weren't the actual tributes, but designs accelerated and artificially matured bearing a resemblance to the dead tributes to screw with the survivors' heads. They aren't reanimated.
ralfinader - 4/11/2012, 8:02 PM
It's really spelled 'Muttations' and not Mutations? I thought a headline on the main page had a glaring mispelling. Kinda looks like the typical CGI werewolfie type, with a big dash of the dogs from Ghostbusters.
DarthTesla - 4/11/2012, 8:04 PM
Cool find. That's pretty close to how I envisioned them while reading the book.
Spidey91 - 4/11/2012, 8:06 PM
I finally watched this movie,today.
f*cking awesome movie!
TheRaven20 - 4/11/2012, 8:06 PM
I disagree. I think it would have been really cool and creepy while showing how sadistic the capitol was by having them represent the dead tributes regardless of whether the audience knew if they were the tributes themselves or just meant to look like them or not. Missed opportunity in my opinion. One of the many reasons the movie felt underwhelming to me.
DEATHbyEXILE - 4/11/2012, 8:06 PM
CrimsonComedian - 4/11/2012, 8:10 PM
Those look ridiculous. In the book, they are mutts, but Katniss notices the resemblances in hair color, eyes, and build, not the fact that they look like ridiculous hybrids. Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the movie the mutts looked more dog like monsters right?
tweeeeenkies3 - 4/11/2012, 8:12 PM
It COULD have POSSIBLY worked...It would be awesome, actually.
I liked that part of the book. It showed how far the Capital was willing to push it. They are sadistic people. It's what they do...it worked.

Some of these I recognize...
The orange, fox-like one, is DEFINITELY Foxface, my favorite character. Her concept art ROCKS, by far my favorite.

Glimmer's is obvious as well. Blonde, emerald eyes, and HUGE bumps from the Tracker Jacker stings.

Awesome art!
SuspenseSmith - 4/11/2012, 8:35 PM
I liked how they handled this in the movie. It was a huge WTF moment in the book.
avengingson - 4/11/2012, 9:06 PM
It *was* kind of a WTF moment in the book... But if you look at the scheme of things, it really helped reinforce the fact that there's a high level of technology going on there.... Something that's not really that clear until later in the series....
Ryguy88 - 4/11/2012, 9:06 PM
It would have been cool if they went with that but I guess it would have added even more to the running time to explain it in an organic way.
NeoBaggins - 4/11/2012, 9:07 PM
That would have been even more confusing and stupid than it already is in the movie. They are the worst part of the film mainly because of the terrible looking CGI.
Redleader - 4/11/2012, 9:13 PM
@Tweeeeenkies I keep hearing people say they like fox face but she was barely in the book at all. I can't remember if she had any dialogue but I don't think she did. She was just there. From my point of view she was a pretty insignificant character. I don't mean to critique you in a bad way, I'm just wondering what made her your favorite character.
SuspenseSmith - 4/11/2012, 9:25 PM
@Redleader

Well, she was the only one that didn't help anyone die really. Even Rue pointed out the wasps to Katniss. It was a fun idea of having a clever girl running around. I don't know, I don't really get it.

My favorite was Rue. Her death in both the book and the movie was probably the greatest part of the story. I got shivers seeing district 11 going crazy over it. Brilliant writing.
SuspenseSmith - 4/11/2012, 9:29 PM
@Gambit89

I told my dad about the ending in the book. He was like "OMG. Glad they didn't do that in the movie. It was intense enough for a younger audience."

This was made for kids after all... right?
TheSoulEater - 4/11/2012, 9:35 PM
Photobucket.
pro346 - 4/11/2012, 9:54 PM
So the book rips off the island of dr moreau...what hasn't the movie/book ripped off.
Tainted87 - 4/11/2012, 9:55 PM
@SuspenseSmith
Errrrrrrr.... no, not for kids. Especially Mockingjay (and I don't know how they'll manage that with a PG-13 rating), where children (not teenagers) are rounded up and used as shields around a certain bad guy's mansion. Suffice it to say that these children do not stop the resistance from bombing the area...
abuleban - 4/11/2012, 10:01 PM
Very glad they skipped this part of the book
Tainted87 - 4/11/2012, 10:02 PM
Oh and yes "muttations" is how it is spelled. They are mutts. Neither human nor canine.
nailbiter111 - 4/11/2012, 10:06 PM
Enjoy these while you can because Lionsgate will be yanking them from our site very soon. They had the artist remove them.
Tainted87 - 4/11/2012, 10:18 PM
That should be a lesson to those who in any way believe Alan Moore owns the rights to Watchmen.
Maia87 - 4/12/2012, 12:47 AM
tweeeeenkies3 - 4/12/2012, 3:11 AM
@RedLeader...She did not have any dialogue, no....What made her my favorite was her character descrption. She was smart. She did not have to kill to survive, she used her brain instead of brawn to survive. She knew how to get by with stealing, hiding and creeping without getting caught.
I am sure if she did not eat the Nighlocks, she would've won the games, just for being smart, over being strong.
vinnie8519 - 4/12/2012, 6:49 AM
i agree worst part of the book...

Please log in to post comments.

Don't have an account?
Please Register.

.