The HIGHLANDER Star Henry Cavill Teases The Amazing Swordplay That Will Be Featured In The Reboot
Related:

The HIGHLANDER Star Henry Cavill Teases The Amazing Swordplay That Will Be Featured In The Reboot

Delroy Lindo And Jack O'Connell Board Ryan Coogler And Michael B. Jordan's Untitled Supernatural Movie
Recommended For You:

Delroy Lindo And Jack O'Connell Board Ryan Coogler And Michael B. Jordan's Untitled Supernatural Movie

DISCLAIMER: ComicBookMovie.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and... [MORE]

ComicBookMovie.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

1 2
Luminus
Luminus - 7/31/2013, 5:07 AM
12 minutes? What a letdown.
HavocPrime
HavocPrime - 7/31/2013, 5:08 AM
Awesome news but how much was actually cut, as the film was already quite long to begin with.
SomTingWong
SomTingWong - 7/31/2013, 5:18 AM
12 minutes? no sale from me
darkimage
darkimage - 7/31/2013, 5:31 AM
for only 12 minutes, I'm glad I waited and just didn't buy the theatrical release. I'll be glad to own the extended cut, but wouldn't have made a second purchase (unless the bonus features are incredible.)
Super12
Super12 - 7/31/2013, 5:32 AM
I love you PJ, but you sure do love taking me for all I'm worth. Will I pony up the dough for this? Eventually yeah, probably. But next film I'm waiting and not buying the regular DVD when it comes out
MCUsDarkKnight
MCUsDarkKnight - 7/31/2013, 5:53 AM
Despite it only having 12 extra minutes i'm for sure buying this and adding to the collection!
TheNameIsBetty
TheNameIsBetty - 7/31/2013, 5:55 AM
12 minutes is a little "eh, meh", but I'll still get this!
BigMikeReviews
BigMikeReviews - 7/31/2013, 5:56 AM
I think 12 minutes more is remarkable given the fact that the actual movie felt like an extended edition to begin with.
SpideyQuad
SpideyQuad - 7/31/2013, 5:58 AM
I'll be buying this since I held off buying the theatrical version this time around.
cswendse
cswendse - 7/31/2013, 5:59 AM
Holy Crap, they made this movie longer!?!?!?!?! What is there another verse to the dinner song?
NoAssemblyReqd
NoAssemblyReqd - 7/31/2013, 6:05 AM
I've shown this movie to friends and family when they visit. 60% fall asleep on the couch within the first 35 minutes.
JoshBerger
JoshBerger - 7/31/2013, 6:17 AM
LMFAO extended? People have taken shits longer than 12 minutes...this IS a letdown. I loved the movie, but this is one of the reasons why The Hobbit shouldn't have been made in first place, people do expect a lot more from this....and making it a trilogy was the most retarded decision ever made.

Here's a female dwarf in case you were wondering what they look like.



Yeah...I know.....
ManDeth
ManDeth - 7/31/2013, 6:25 AM
This scene is the best part of the Hobbit.
Shaggy
Shaggy - 7/31/2013, 6:29 AM
no thanks
Rothwilder
Rothwilder - 7/31/2013, 6:31 AM
12 minutes? No
ManDeth
ManDeth - 7/31/2013, 6:40 AM
@monkeyballs Watch the video I posted and you might enjoy the Hobbit a bit more.
sansClaymore
sansClaymore - 7/31/2013, 6:47 AM
as a huge tolkien fan... i am also incredibly let down... i fear that all we will see is bomburs ass at rivendell shitting into the elven stream and a facefull of establishing shots of mountains and the like.

no, i fear we will not see the eagles eyrie or gandalf actually speaking to the eagles, they seem to have skipped that altogether and were dropped off at the carock, instead. i fear bolg has been stripped from the story altogether and the addition of the white council side story and the rock giant battle was all we got as far as new content.

when the lord of the rings came out... audiences grew accustomed to long epic movies
i am not at all displeased with the length of the film as i am a firm believer in the more the better especially when it comes to tolkien on film.

when word first grew of an extended edition on the horizon i was truly excited
now i feel extremely let down
the sequels had better make up for what could have been , only time will tell. and while i believe only peter jackson could have made these films as good as the lord of the rings trilogy, for the first time ever i am wondering what would have been had guillermo del toro not quit the production.
LucasMend
LucasMend - 7/31/2013, 6:53 AM
For me the theatrical cut was already an extended version. wow.
CapFan79
CapFan79 - 7/31/2013, 7:02 AM
I wanna see a trailer with new footage first because I really felt the theatrical cut was enough.
sansClaymore
sansClaymore - 7/31/2013, 7:12 AM
maybe you havnt seen the extended editions of the lord of the rings trilogy maybe u have regardless the "appendices" is almost guaranteed to be no more than the already publicly available video blogs that he released over the course of production compiled under one roof.

the EE lotr each had over 20 minutes of extra content added directly into the movie, which included many small but important bits from the books that made them feel more accurate and better on the whole.

my only problem with the news of the ee hobbit only being 12 minutes is that it is already fairly obvious what that 12 minutes will be... bombur taking a deuce in rivendell.

all that said... i love the hobbit and cant wait for the sequels
like lucasmend said the theatrical cut was like an extended cut to begin with and that is awesome. the movie was great for only being 1/3 rd of the story.

but after being billed first as two movies, then 3, then they pushed back the third films release from summer 2014 to december, the drastic rewriting of bolg and azogs story and the last minute addition of the CG azog. im cringing at the thought that they only have 12 minutes to add to a film they are billing as an extended cut
Bojac
Bojac - 7/31/2013, 7:15 AM
Boo hoo, only twelve minutes.
I'm here for the Special Features.
Gamera623
Gamera623 - 7/31/2013, 7:16 AM
You know the world is upside down when fettastic is the fan defending the film and everyone else is a hater. :)

And Im with fet. 12 minutes is dissapointing when you compare it to the 30 minutes or so that was added to the LotR movies...but Unexpected Journey is long enough already. And 12 minutes far exceeds what most extended editions have.

And we knew there was deleted scenes because in the trailer you see Bilbo looking at the broken sword in Rivendell.

I will wait for the extended trilogy set. So I wont own these films until 2016. Im surprised that more of you arent waiting for that.
misner89
misner89 - 7/31/2013, 7:46 AM



thanks peter lol
ruadh
ruadh - 7/31/2013, 7:56 AM
I'll still hold out for the box set with all three extended editions. :)

@fettastic, actually agree with you.
ruadh
ruadh - 7/31/2013, 7:57 AM
@Dandy

I think FOTR had closer to a half hour of added footage.
A2ron
A2ron - 7/31/2013, 8:04 AM
Why the hell is everyone complaining about only 12 mins of deleted scenes? Don't they realize that it means Peter only cut that much and we saw practically everything he shot for the first movie in theaters?
Facade
Facade - 7/31/2013, 8:12 AM
Damn! I thought we were getting an aditional 45 min.!
ruadh
ruadh - 7/31/2013, 8:13 AM
I may be one of the few in the audience who found Radagast completely entertaining.
supermarioworldE
supermarioworldE - 7/31/2013, 8:15 AM
The other two movies are the "extensions"
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 7/31/2013, 8:41 AM
I'll defiantly be buying this the first day. And the movie was awesome. One of the best of 2012.
MrCBM56
MrCBM56 - 7/31/2013, 8:44 AM
"12 minutes? What a letdown"

You guys know nothing about movie. 12 minutes is actually pretty high. Considering the movie was about 2 hours and 58 minutes, how many extra [frick]ing minutes do you want?

monkeyballs

LMAO Gollum was not scary in the book. Disturbing? Yes. SCary? No.
1 2
FOLLOW ComicBookMovie.com
View Recorder