RESULTS: Who Should Direct X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST Now?

That's extremely proper. I'm confident that Singer can still handle the X-Men property well - X-Men: First Class was partly his responsibility after all - and say what you want to say about the man, but he makes good movies. Give it to him.

Singer knows how to do x-men movies cause he is a fan but he was never a fan of Superman comics

I don't hate Superman Returns, but I understand how people see it as a bad adaptation of the character...that maybe is true, but as a movie alone, I fail to see how it's THAT bad in any aspect!

So yeah, I still believe in Singer.

@Pux

come on Green Lantern was terrible they should of done better.

@hayyam

they do have OTHER in the poll lol

@jazzman, he never was a fan of ANY comic books. Not X-Men, not Superman, not anything. He's in it for the money. I'm not hatin' on his directorial skills, cuz they're ok, but don't say something that's not true. I have the dvds, i know what he says.

Back to boring black leathers

Giznad, i dont see why these directors, actors have to be fans of the medium beforehand.

@Name, they don't. In fact, it could be better that way. But I heard from Singer that he was never a fan of comics, so I just wanted to set it straight. The best actors in these franchises are usually never fans of the comics, so perhaps being a fan could distort one's efforts and focus.

Both green lantern and captain America were both crap.

Singer may be the most overrated filmmaker in the business.

Superman returns was not a bad film,it's just wasn't the film everyone wanted superman to be in

WTF is up with these choices? Ridley Scott? make the shit realistic at least.

.... singer should quit. Worst director in comic book movies.

Bryan Singer will do great in coming back and helming another Xmen movie. He did give us X2 and it is still one of the best film in the franchise close to Xmen first class, and he was part of that to as a producer and story.

I did like Superman but it wasn't the superman we wanted, we wanted a new take on superman. Also remember he did bring back superman from what Tim burtons original idea was. Know some backgrounds and facts before saying anything about his take on superman.

Tim burtons superman?
J.J abrams Superman Flyby (Which Lex is a kryptonian and Krypton is still around.)
McG's Superman? seriously McG? the corporate director? WB's tool?
Brett Ratner? Okay that guys a hack of director. Only good movie he made is Family Man, Rush Hour 1 & 2. That's it.

It's funny how a majority of users on this site used to bitch about Bryan Singer and his X-Men films, yet suddenly everyone wants him to return to the franchise.

I liked his two X-Men films, but I'm not sure I want him back for this one. It seems he works better in helping develop the story rather than directing, and I think if he returned it might seem like a step backward.

If you all hate Fox so much the answer is simple. Just stop watching the their movies. Don't like their Marvel movies? You're all the ones that payed to watch the X-franchise and made it a success. If they personally offend you that much just read the comics or watch the animated series.

"It's funny how a majority of users on this site used to bitch about Bryan Singer and his X-Men films, yet suddenly everyone wants him to return to the franchise."

Not me I didn't vote for him. X1 was ok for its time but now showing its age. X2 was only good in Whitehouse scene but that's it. Wasted Rogue, wasted Cyclops, wasted Colussus, wasted Riptide, wasted Havock?? They put him in the First Class film and the character is wasted. Angel Salvatore wasted. She can't possibly come back in a sequel.

Hated Superman Returns - Singer left X3 to do a remake of Superman 1 and disguise it as sequel with a bit Dragonball Z added to the mix. Wasted Lex Luthor henchmen. Did any of them say anything in the film? He could be putting characters to good use but insteads wastes them on stupid longwinded shots or excessive periods of no dialogue - use the time develop characters!!!

The fact that Vaughn has walked out a second time shows that producers can't get their s*** together when it comes to XMen films. A script with no director - wait a minute! Is there a script??

any of these will do.....

-josh trank
-rupert wyatt
-jj abrams
-byran singer

@ maximus101

if captain america the first avenger is crap how would you rate the 90s movie of captain america?

crap comic book movies

-captain america
-daredevil
-elektra
-howard the duck
-hulk
-ghost rider
-ghost rider spirit of vengeance
-the punisher(89)
-the punisher
-the punisher war zone(guilty pleasure)
-fantastic four
-fantastic four rise of the silver surfer
-x-men origins wolverine
-batman forever
-batman & robin
-superman 3
-superman 4
-superman returns
-supergirl
-green lantern
-jonah hex
-catwoman
-steel
-swamp thing
-return of the swamp thing

now captain america the first avenger is better then all of those movies,so please you really need to learn the meaning of the word crap.

Here we go again thinking that only marvel can respect the source material. I guess its easy to respect the source material when you can change the source matrial to match your MCU. Black leather, I guess, works for Hawkeye and shield agents. Why not the same hate for Hawkeye, and black widow being founding members of avengers, but not Hank and janet.

I just wonder sometimes how was singer ever disrepectfull to the xmen.Because he didnt put them in their 1970s costume. Because he didnt tell the same story you've read already a hundred times. So I guess yall hate every artist who changes a costume, or every writer to tell their own story. I wonder how you felt about Old Man Logan, or Len Wein for that matter.

Why not? Not like there's a whole lot more they can do to screw up this franchise.

Just keep Singer doing X-Men films. It's obvious that without him they suck (Origins, X3). And all other CBMs suck WITH him (Superman Returns).

He directed X1 and X2 (my favorite film), and produced First Class (second favorite).

He's one of those rare directors that knows how to handle a team/ensemble cast. The Usual Suspects being a prime example.

@Halloween

You're missing my a couple of my points. It's not about who is more disrepectfull. Its the term disrespectfull in itself. When a new writer/artist takes over a book stuff changes. Was it disrepectfull when Len Wein Gave us all new xmen. Is it disrepectfull when every artist in every different x-book drew Hope to look any where between a preteen to grown woman. What you call direspectfull I call artist interpetation. You dont have to like that interpetation but its not direspect.

How can you say one is disrespectfull and the others arent. Point being if singers xmen is shit because they dont follow the source material, you shouldnt like any cbm besides sin city. Avengers, tdk trilogy,or most other cbm change alot from there source material. It doesnt make them bad movies. The Godfather was not 100% faithfull to Mario Puzo's book does that make that movie bad too.

You wouldnt want to get get into that debate, because as much as I like the avengers its not any more faithfull to the comics as the first Xmen. I dont remember seeing the Chitari, black widow, hawkeye, or countless others in avengers #1. I wonder what version of Ironmans armor was stark using When the Avengers formed. I wonder what Nick Fury had to do with forming the avengers. Oh i forgot marvel can change the source material to fit their MCU(New Avengers#10).I could go on and on but I wont because I dont expect the movies to be just like the books.

Hey you dont have to like any movie, but saying "its disrespectfull to the source material" is a played out excuse. If you're a hater just admit it, there's nothing wrong with that. Hey I dislike TDK trilogy, because I cant stand bale. See its easy. You just dont see me on every batman article screaming how much nolan disrespected batman by making him "grounded in reality".

I would want Singer, Trank, or Slade

I don't want Bryan Singer to direct any Xmen movies.